Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 75–82 | Cite as

Dog owners show experience-based viewing behaviour in judging dog face approachability

  • Carla Jade Gavin
  • Sarah Houghton
  • Kun GuoEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Our prior visual experience plays a critical role in face perception. We show superior perceptual performance for differentiating conspecific (vs non-conspecific), own-race (vs other-race) and familiar (vs unfamiliar) faces. However, it remains unclear whether our experience with faces of other species would influence our gaze allocation for extracting salient facial information. In this eye-tracking study, we asked both dog owners and non-owners to judge the approachability of human, monkey and dog faces, and systematically compared their behavioural performance and gaze pattern associated with the task. Compared to non-owners, dog owners assessed dog faces with shorter time and fewer fixations, but gave higher approachability ratings. The gaze allocation within local facial features was also modulated by the ownership. The averaged proportion of the fixations and viewing time directed at the dog mouth region were significantly less for the dog owners, and more experienced dog owners tended to look more at the dog eyes, suggesting the adoption of a prior experience-based viewing behaviour for assessing dog approachability. No differences in behavioural performance and gaze pattern were observed between dog owners and non-owners when judging human and monkey faces, implying that the dog owner’s experience-based gaze strategy for viewing dog faces was not transferable across faces of other species.

Keywords

Mouth Region Approachability Rating Facial Information Monkey Face Facial Trait 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bar, M., & Biederman, I. (1998). Subliminal visual priming. Psychological Science, 9, 464–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, J. J. S., Radcliffe, N., Cherkasova, M. V., Edelman, J., & Intriligator, J. M. (2006). Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception, 35, 1089–1105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48, 763–773.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. The British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchan, J. N., Pare, M., & Munhall, K. G. (2000). Spatial statistics of gaze fixations during dynamic face processing. Social Neuroscience, 2, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmel, D., & Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crespi, S., Robino, C., Silva, O., & de’Sperati, C. (2012). Spotting expertise in the eyes: Billiards knowledge as revealed by gaze shifts in a dynamic visual prediction task. Journal of Vision, 12(11), 30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dehon, H., & Brédart, S. (2001). An other-race effect in age estimation from faces. Perception, 30, 1107–1113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Donovan, T., & Manning, D. J. (2007). The radiology task: bayesian theory and perception. British Journal of Radiology, 80, 389–391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo, K. (2012). Holistic gaze strategy to categorize facial expression of varying intensities. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo, K. (2013). Size-invariant facial expression categorization and associated gaze allocation within social interaction space. Perception, 42, 1027–1042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo, K., Mahmoodi, S., Robertson, R. G., & Young, M. P. (2006). Longer fixation duration while viewing face images. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 91–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo, K., Tunnicliffe, D., & Roebuck, H. (2010). Human spontaneous gaze patterns in viewing of faces of different species. Perception, 39, 533–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo, K., & Shaw, H. (2015). Face in profile view reduces perceived facial expression intensity: an eye-tracking study. Acta Psychologica, 155, 19–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Heisz, J. J., & Shore, D. I. (2008). More efficient scanning for familiar faces. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2011). Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses preceding the lower half of a face. Visual Cognition, 19, 313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Humphrey, K., & Underwood, G. (2009). Domain knowledge moderates the influence of visual saliency in scene recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 377–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kestenbaum, R. (1992). Feeling happy versus feeling good: the processing of discrete and global categories of emotional expressions by children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1132–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kundel, H. L., Nodine, C. F., Krupinski, E. A., & Mello-Thomas, C. (2008). Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Academic Radiology, 15, 881–886.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malcolm, G. L., Lanyon, L. J., Fugard, A. J. B., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: an exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. Journal of Vision, 8(8), 2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsumoto, H., Terao, Y., Yugeta, A., Fukuda, H., Emoto, M., et al. (2011). Where do neurologists look when viewing brain ct images? an eye-tracking study involving stroke cases. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e28928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. McKone, E., Kanwisher, N., & Duchaine, B. C. (2006). Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 8–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nabatilan, L. B., Aghazadeh, F., Nimbarte, A. D., Harvey, C. C., & Chowdhury, S. K. (2012). Effect of driving experience on visual behaviour and driving performance under different driving conditions. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nodine, C. F., Kundel, H. L., Lauver, S. C., & Toto, L. C. (1996). Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses. Academic Radiology, 3, 1000–1006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory and Cognition, 22, 208–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pascalis, O., & Bachevalier, J. (1998). Face recognition in primates: a cross species study. Behavioural Processes, 43, 87–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pihko, E., Virtanen, A., Saarinen, V. M., Pannasch, S., Hirvenkari, L., Tossavainen, T., … Hari, R. (2011). Experiencing art: the influence of expertise and painting abstraction level. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 94. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00094.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: evidence from eye movements. Psychological Science, 12, 48–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rousselet, G. A., Mace, M. J. M., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2004). Animal and human faces in natural scenes: how specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? Journal of Vision, 4, 13–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schyns, P. G., Petro, L. S., & Smith, M. L. (2007). Dynamics of visual information integration in the brain for categorizing facial expressions. Current Biology, 17, 1580–1585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Underwood, G. (1998). Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  34. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 161–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 44, 671–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van Belle, G., Ramon, M., Lefèvre, P., & Rossion, B. (2010). Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 20. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00020.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Vernon, R. J. W., Sutherland, C. A. M., Young, A. W., & Hartley, T. (2014). Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 3353–3361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vogt, S., & Magnussen, S. (2007). Expertise in pictorial perception: eye-movement patterns and visual memory in artists and laymen. Perception, 36, 91–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wan, M., Bolger, N., & Champagne, F. A. (2012). Human perception of fear in dogs varies according to experience with dogs. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51775.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Waters, A. J., Underwood, G., & Findlay, J. M. (1997). Studying expertise in music reading: use of a pattern-matching paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 477–488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Willis, M. L., Palermo, R., & Burke, D. (2011). Judging approachability on the face of it: the influence of face and body expressions on the perception of approachability. Emotion, 11, 514–523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood, G., Batt, J., Appelboam, A., Harris, A., & Wilson, M. R. (2014). Exploring the impact of expertise, clinical history, and visual search on electrocardiogram interpretation. Medical Decision Making, 34, 75–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747–759.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zangemeister, W. H., Sherman, K., & Stark, L. (1995). Evidence for a global scanpath strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1009–1025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK

Personalised recommendations