A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis
- 806 Downloads
The term “cultural recycling” derives from the neuronal recycling hypothesis, which suggests that representations of cultural inventions like written words, Arabic numbers, or tools can occupy brain areas dedicated to other functions. In the present selective review article, we propose a recycling hypothesis for the ideomotor mechanism. The ideomotor approach assumes that motor actions are controlled by the anticipation of the expected perceptual consequences that they aim to generate in the environment. Arguably, such action–perception mechanisms contribute to motor behaviour for human and non-human animals since millions of years. However, recent empirical studies suggest that the ideomotor mechanism can also contribute to word processing, number representation, and arithmetic. For instance, it has been shown that the anticipatory simulation of abstract semantics, like the numerical quantitative value of three items can prime processing of the associated Arabic number “3”. Arabic numbers, words, or tools represent cultural inventions, so that, from a theoretical perspective, we suggest an ideomotor recycling hypothesis for the interaction with such artefacts. In this view, the ideomotor mechanism spreads its influence to other functions beyond motor control, and is recycled to flexibly adapt different human behaviours towards dealing with more abstract concepts.
KeywordsCompatibility Effect Colour Word Arabic Number Incompatible Condition Cultural Invention
- Baroody, A. J. (1987). Children’s mathematical thinking: a developmental framework for preschool, primary and special education teachers. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
- Beck, B. B. (1980). Animal tool use behavior: The use and manufacture of tools by animals. New York: Garland STPM Press.Google Scholar
- Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Dehaene, S. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The ‘‘neuronal recycling’’ hypothesis. In S. Dehaene, J. R. Duhamel, M. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkey brain to human brain (pp. 133–157). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dehaene, S. (2007). Les neurones de la lecture. Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
- Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain. Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
- Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555–556. doi: 10.1038/nn1066.
- Gibson, K. R. (1993). Generative interplay between technical capacities, social relations, imitation and cognition. In K. R. Gibson & T. Ingold (Eds.), Tools, language and cognition in human evolution (pp. 251–269). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2001). A common framework for language comprehension and language production? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 887–888.Google Scholar
- Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and brain sciences, 36, 329-347. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495.
- Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., & Koch, I. (2009). Cognition and action. In E. Morsella, J. Bargh, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), The Psychology of Action (Vol. 2, pp. 35–71)., Mechanisms of Human Action Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wood, G., Nuerk, H. C., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489–525.Google Scholar