Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 82–93 | Cite as

Human place and response learning: navigation strategy selection, pupil size and gaze behavior

  • Olivier de Condappa
  • Jan M. Wiener
Original Article

Abstract

In this study, we examined the cognitive processes and ocular behavior associated with on-going navigation strategy choice using a route learning paradigm that distinguishes between three different wayfinding strategies: an allocentric place strategy, and the egocentric associative cue and beacon response strategies. Participants approached intersections of a known route from a variety of directions, and were asked to indicate the direction in which the original route continued. Their responses in a subset of these test trials allowed the assessment of strategy choice over the course of six experimental blocks. The behavioral data revealed an initial maladaptive bias for a beacon response strategy, with shifts in favor of the optimal configuration place strategy occurring over the course of the experiment. Response time analysis suggests that the configuration strategy relied on spatial transformations applied to a viewpoint-dependent spatial representation, rather than direct access to an allocentric representation. Furthermore, pupillary measures reflected the employment of place and response strategies throughout the experiment, with increasing use of the more cognitively demanding configuration strategy associated with increases in pupil dilation. During test trials in which known intersections were approached from different directions, visual attention was directed to the landmark encoded during learning as well as the intended movement direction. Interestingly, the encoded landmark did not differ between the three navigation strategies, which is discussed in the context of initial strategy choice and the parallel acquisition of place and response knowledge.

Keywords

Test Trial Experimental Block Pupil Dilation Response Strategy Pupil Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersen, N. E., Dahmani, L., Konishi, K., & Bohbot, V. D. (2012). Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 97(1), 81–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boksem, M. A., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M. (2005). Effects of mental fatigue on attention: an ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 107–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassel, R., Kelche, C., Lecourtier, L., & Cassel, J.-C. (2012). The match/mismatch of visuo-spatial cues between acquisition and retrieval contexts influences the expression of response vs. place memory in rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 230(2), 333–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8(4), 302–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grasso, R., Prévost, P., Ivanenko, Y. P., & Berthoz, A. (1998). Eye-head coordination for the steering of locomotion in humans: an anticipatory synergy. Neuroscience Letters, 253(2), 115–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton, D. A., Driscoll, I., & Sutherland, R. J. (2002). Human place learning in a virtual Morris water task: some important constraints on the flexibility of place navigation. Behavioural Brain Research, 129, 159–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartley, T., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J., & Burgess, N. (2003). The well-worn route and the path less travelled: distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron, 37(5), 877–888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science, 143, 1190–1192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iaria, G., Petrides, M., Dagher, A., Pike, B., & Bohbot, V. D. (2003). Cognitive strategies dependent on the hippocampus and caudate nucleus in human navigation: variability and change with practice. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(13), 5945–5952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Iglói, K., Zaoui, M., Berthoz, A., & Rondi-Reig, L. (2009). Sequential egocentric strategy is acquired as early as allocentric strategy: Parallel acquisition of these two navigation strategies. Hippocampus, 19(12), 1199–1211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1993). The intensity dimension of thought: pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 310–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154(3756), 1583–1585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King, J. A., Burgess, N., Hartley, T., Vargha-Khadem, F., & O’Keefe, J. (2002). Human hippocampus and viewpoint dependence in spatial memory. Hippocampus, 12(6), 811–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., Rasch, B., & Blajenkova, O. (2006). Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Livingstone-Lee, S. A., Murchison, S., Zeman, P. M., Ghandi, M., van Gerven, D., Stewart, L., et al. (2011). Simple gaze analysis and special design of a virtual Morris water maze provides a new method for differentiating egocentric and allocentric navigation strategy choice. Behavioural Brain Research, 225(1), 117–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lowenstein, O., Feinberg, R., & Loewenfeld, I. E. (1963). Pupillary movements during acute and chronic fatigue. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2(2), 138–157.Google Scholar
  19. Manor, B. R., & Gordon, E. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128(1), 85–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marchette, S. A., Bakker, A., & Shelton, A. L. (2011). Cognitive mappers to creatures of habit: differential engagement of place and response learning mechanisms predicts human navigational behavior. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(43), 15264–15268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marshall, S. P., Pleydell-Pearce, C. W., & Dickson, B. T. (2003). Integrating psychophysiological measures of cognitive workload and eye movements to detect strategy shifts. In Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on System Sciences. Hawaii: IEEE.Google Scholar
  22. Matthews, G., & Desmond, P. A. (2002). Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55(2), 659–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mueller, S. C., Jackson, C. P. T., & Skelton, R. W. (2008). Sex differences in a virtual water maze: an eye tracking and pupillometry study. Behavioural Brain Research, 193(2), 209–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nishiyama, J., Tanida, K., Kusumi, M., & Hirata, Y. (2007). The pupil as a possible premonitor of drowsiness. In Proceedings of the 29th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Lyon: IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Packard, M. G., & McGaugh, J. L. (1996). Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 65(1), 65–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmitzer-Torbert, N. (2007). Place and response learning in human virtual navigation: Behavioral measures and gender differences. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121(2), 277–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43(4), 274–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sibley, C., Coyne, J., & Baldwin, C. (2011). Pupil dilation as an index of learning. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting. Las Vegas: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behaviour (Vol. 10, pp. 9–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tlauka, M., & Wilson, P. N. (1994). The effect of landmarks on route-learning in a computer-simulated environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(4), 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waller, D., & Lippa, Y. (2007). Landmarks as beacons and associative cues: their role in route learning. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 910–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 376–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiener, J. M., de Condappa, O., Harris, M. A., & Wolbers, T. (2013). Maladaptive bias for extrahippocampal navigation strategies in aging humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(14), 6012–6017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wiener, J. M., de Condappa, O., & Höelscher, C. (2011). Do you have to look where you go? Gaze behaviour during spatial decision making. In L. Carlson, C. Höelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  37. Wiener, J. M., Höelscher, C., Büchner, S., & Konieczny, L. (2012). Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making. Psychological Research, 76(6), 713–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and TechnologyBournemouth UniversityPooleUK

Personalised recommendations