Bimanual force control: cooperation and interference?
- 289 Downloads
Three experiments were designed to determine the level of cooperation or interference observed from the forces generated in one limb on the forces exhibited by the contralateral limb when one or both limbs were producing a constant force (Experiment 1), one limb was producing a dynamic force while the other limb was producing a constant force (Experiment 2), and both limbs were producing dynamic force patterns (Experiment 3). The results for both Experiments 1 and 2 showed relatively strong positive time series cross correlations between the left and right limb forces indicating increases or decreases in the forces generated by one limb resulted in corresponding changes in the forces produced by the homologous muscles of the contralateral limb. Experiment 3 required participants to coordinate 1:1 and 1:2 rhythmical bimanual force production tasks when provided Lissajous feedback. The results indicated very effective performance of both bimanual coordination patterns. However, identifiable influences of right limb forces on the left limb force time series were observed in the 1:2 coordination pattern but not in the 1:1 pattern. The results of all three experiments support the notion that neural crosstalk is partially responsible for the stabilities and instabilities associated with bimanual coordination.
KeywordsCoordination Pattern Contralateral Limb Bimanual Coordination Left Limb Bimanual Task
This work was supported by student research grants from the Huffines Institute and College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University to D. M. Kennedy.
- Beets, I. A. M, Gooijers, J., Boisgontier, M. P., Pauwels, L., Coxon, J. P., Wittenberg, G., & Swinnen, S. P. (2014). Reduced neural differentiation between feedback conditions after bimanual coordination with and without augmented feedback. Cerebral Cortex. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu005
- Hill, A. V. (1970). First and last experiments in muscle mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of the brain and behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, D. M., Boyle, J. B., Rhee, J., & Shea, C. H. (2014). Rhythmical bimanual force production: homologous and non-homologous muscles. Experimental Brain Research. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4102-y
- Krishnan, V., & Jaric, S. (2010). Effects of task complexity on coordination of inter-limb and within-limb forces in static bimanual manipulation. Motor Control, 230, 528–544.Google Scholar
- Riek, S., Carson, R. G., & Byblow, W. D. (1992). Spatial and muscular dependencies in bimanual coordination. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 23, 251–265.Google Scholar
- Sainburg, R. L. (2010). Lateralization of goal-directed movement. Vision and goal-directed movement (pp. 219–288). Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Swinnen, S. P., Dounskaia, N., Walter, C. B., & Serrien, D. J. (1997). Preferred and induced coordination modes during the acquisition of bimanual movements with a 2:1 frequency ratio. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1087–1110.Google Scholar
- Temprado, J. J., Zanone, P. G., Monno, A., & Laurent, M. (1999). Attentional load associated with performing and stabilizing preferred bimanual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1579–1594.Google Scholar
- Treffner, P. J., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Resonance constraints on rhythmic movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1221–1237.Google Scholar