Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 79, Issue 6, pp 1064–1076 | Cite as

When the going gets tough…: Self-motivation is associated with invigoration and fun

  • Miguel KazénEmail author
  • Julius Kuhl
  • Eva-Maria Leicht
Original Article

Abstract

Personality systems interaction (PSI) theory postulates two executive control modes in volitional action: Self-control and self-regulation (self-motivation). Self-control should deplete energy whereas self-motivation should maintain energy and result in invigoration. There were three groups of participants: Self-control, self-motivation, and pretend, who performed a resource-demanding Stroop-Shift and an anagram task. Performance and energy expenditure were examined in each task. Compared to the other groups, the self-motivation group showed increments in blood glucose throughout the experiment, indicating invigoration, and had better performance on the difficult Stroop-Shift task than the self-control group. Additionally, for the self-motivation group anagram performance correlated with less effort and ease of concentration and was moderated by fun in the task. These results are consonant with the predictions of PSI and self-determination theories. It is concluded that self-control depletes resources whereas self-motivation is associated with invigoration in carrying resource-demanding tasks.

Keywords

Blood Glucose Level Color Word Concentration Problem Letter Task Solution Word 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2005). How to resist temptation: the effects of external control versus autonomy support on self-regulatory dynamics. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 443–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00315.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Self-control depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M. T., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: strength-boosting interventions and trait moderators of ego depletion. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego depletion: a resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition, 18, 130–150. doi: 10.1521/soco.2000.18.2.130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckmann, J., & Kuhl, J. (1984). Altering information to gain action control: functional aspects of human information processing in decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18(2), 224–237. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(84)90031-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beedie, C. J., & Lane, A. M. (2012). The role of glucose in self-control: another look at the evidence and an alternative conceptualization. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 143–153. doi: 10.1177/1088868311419817.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blunt, A., & Pychyl, T. A. (1998). Volitional action and inaction in the lives of undergraduate students: state orientation, procrastination and proneness to boredom. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(6), 837–846. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00018-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bossong, B. (1994). Scholastic stressors and achievement-related anxiety. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: action versus state orientation (pp. 397–406). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M. T., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1653–1662. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323981.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dieffendorf, J. M., Hall, R. J., Lord, R. G., & Strean, M. L. (2000). Action-state orientation: construct validity of a revised measure and its relationship to work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuhrmann, A., & Kuhl, J. (1998). Maintaining a healthy diet: effects of personality and self-reward versus self-punishment on commitment to and enactment of self-chosen and assigned goals. Psychology and Health, 13, 651–686. doi: 10.1080/08870449808407423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gailliot, M. T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). The physiology of willpower: linking blood glucose to self-control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(4), 303–327. doi: 10.1177/1088868307303030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1211–1226. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1211.Google Scholar
  16. Gröpel, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Beckmann, J. (2014). Action versus state orientation and self-control performance after depletion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(4), 476–487. doi: 10.1177/0146167213516636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525. doi: 10.1037/a0019486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heatherton, T. F., & Wagner, D. D. (2011). Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.005.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Heckhausen, H., & Strang, H. (1988). Efficiency under record performance demands: exertion control—an individual difference variable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 489–498. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 450–463. doi: 10.1177/1745691612454134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonides, J., Schumacher, E. H., Smith, E. E., Lauber, E. J., Awh, E., Minoshima, S., & Koeppe, R. A. (1997). Verbal working memory load affects regional brain activation as measured by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(4), 462–475. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.4.462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2007). On the regulation of cognitive control: action orientation moderates the impact of high demands in Stroop interference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 593–609. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kazén, M., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2008). Individual differences in intention initiation under demanding conditions: interactive effects of state vs. action orientation and enactment difficulty. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 693–715. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kehr, H. M. (2004). Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 315–327. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256967.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Koole, S. L., & Fockenberg, D. A. (2011). Implicit emotion regulation under demanding conditions: the moderating role of action versus state orientation. Cognition and Emotion, 25(3), 440–452. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.544891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Koole, S. L., & Jostmann, N. B. (2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 974–990. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.974.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuhl, J. (2000a). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems and interactions. In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111–169). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhl, J. (2000b). The volitional basis of Personality Systems Interaction Theory: applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(7–8), 665–703. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00045-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit: Interaktionen psychischer Systeme [Motivation and personality: Interactions of mental systems]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  30. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Volition and personality: action versus state orientation. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  31. Kuhl, J., & Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The volitional components checklist. In J. Heckhausen & C. Dweck (Eds.), Life span perspectives on motivation and control (pp. 15–49). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1994). Self-discrimination and memory: state orientation and false self-ascription of assigned activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1103–1115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moller, A. C., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). Choice and ego-depletion: the moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1024–1036. doi: 10.1177/0146167206288008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Muraven, M. (2008). Autonomous self-control is less depleting. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(3), 763–770. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.08.002.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Muraven, M., Gagné, M., & Rosman, H. (2008). Helpful self-control: autonomy support, vitality, and depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 573–585. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.008.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Niendam, T. A., Laird, A. R., Ray, K. L., Dean, Y. M., Glahn, D. C., & Carter, C. S. (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(2), 241–268. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0083-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruigendijk, H., & Koole, S. L. (2014). When focusing on a goal interferes with action control: action versus state orientation and over-maintenance of intentions. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 659–672. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9415-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2008). From ego depletion to vitality: theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 702–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: when free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15(3), 185–205. doi: 10.1007/BF00995170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279. doi: 10.1177/01461672962212007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Human Sciences, Institute of PsychologyUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations