Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 371–379 | Cite as

Two is better than one: bilingual education promotes the flexible mind

  • Ingrid K. Christoffels
  • Annelies M. de Haan
  • Laura Steenbergen
  • Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
  • Lorenza S. Colzato
Original Article

Abstract

The interest in the influence of bilingualism on our daily life is constantly growing. Speaking two languages (or more) requires people to develop a flexible mindset to rapidly switch back and forth between languages. This study investigated whether and to what extent attending bilingual education benefits cognitive control. We tested two groups of Dutch high-school students who either followed regular classes in Dutch or were taught in both English and Dutch. They performed on a global–local switching paradigm that provides well-established measures of cognitive flexibility and attentional processing style. As predicted, the bilingually educated group showed smaller switching costs (i.e., greater cognitive flexibility) and a decreased global precedence effect than the regular group. Our findings support the idea that bilingual education promotes cognitive flexibility and a bias towards a more focused “scope” of attention.

Keywords

Cognitive Control Switch Cost Digit Span Cognitive Flexibility Incongruent Trial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Alfrink College, Zoetermeer, and in particular Dhr. Oudenaarden for their help facilitating this study and the students for their participation. We further thank NWO for the financial support of this study.

References

  1. Bialystok, E. (2006). Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 68–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bialystok, E. (2010). Global–local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 93–105.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 859–873.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified anti-saccade task: effects on aging and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1341–1354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Christoffels, I. K., de Groot, A., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters: the role of expertise and language proficiency. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colzato, L. S., Bajo, M. T., van Den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Paolieri, D., Nieuwenhuis, S. T., La Heij, W., et al. (2008a). How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 302–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Colzato, L. S., van Den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Hommel, B. (2008b). Losing the big picture: how religion may control visual attention. PLoS One, 3, e3679.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Colzato, L. S., van Leeuwen, P. J., van Den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Hommel, B. (2010). DOOM’d to switch: superior cognitive flexibility in players of first person shooter games. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 8.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition, 113, 135–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 59–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Groot, A. M., & Christoffels, I. K. (2006). Language control in bilinguals: monolingual tasks and simultaneous interpreting. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 9(2), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3/.
  14. Garbin, G., Sanjuan, A., Forn, C., Bustamante, J. C., Rodriguez-Pujadas, A., Belloch, V., et al. (2010). Bridging language and attention: brain basis of the impact of bilingualism on cognitive control. Neuroimage, 53(4), 1272–1278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, D.W. (2011). Language control in different contexts: the behavioral ecology of bilingual speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2.Google Scholar
  16. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-sematic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar
  17. Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: the adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: life and reality. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hilchey, M. D., & Klein, R. M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 625–658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Fischer, R., & Christoffels, I. K. (2011). Bilingualism and creativity: benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology,. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273.Google Scholar
  21. Huizinga, M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2006). Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variables analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2017–2036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Khare, V., Verma, A., Kar, B., Srinivasan, N., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Bilingualism and the increased attentional blink effect: evidence that the difference between bilinguals and monolinguals generalizes to different levels of second language proficiency. Psychological Research, 77(6), 728–737.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kovács, A. M., & Mehler, J. (2009). Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(16), 6556–6560.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(02), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: a quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.Google Scholar
  27. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees. The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 232–258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Poarch, G. J., & van Hell, J. G. (2012). Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: evidence from second-language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 535–551.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2011). Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: evidence from Spanish-English and Mandarin-English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(4), 682–691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(02), 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Krämer, U. M., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Festman, J., & Münte, T. F. (2011). Self-assessment of individual differences in language switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00388
  36. Rodríguez-Pujadas, A., Sanjuán, A., Ventura-Campos, N., Román, P., Martin, C., Barceló, F., & Ávila, C. (2013). Bilinguals use language-control brain areas more than monolinguals to perform non-linguistic switching tasks. PLoS One, 8(9), e73028.Google Scholar
  37. Special Eurobarometer 243, Europeans and their languages, February 2006. (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_243_en.pdf. pagina 13).
  38. Tao, L., Marzecová, A., Taft, M., Asanowicz, D., & Wodniecka, Z. (2011). The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: the role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology,. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00123.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(30), 12530–12535.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wechsler, D. (1987). Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid K. Christoffels
    • 1
  • Annelies M. de Haan
    • 1
  • Laura Steenbergen
    • 1
  • Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
    • 2
  • Lorenza S. Colzato
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Psychological Research and Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Psychology Department, Amsterdam Center for the Study of Adaptive Control in Brain and Behaviour (Acacia)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations