Psychological Research

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 321–338 | Cite as

The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review

  • Fabrice B. R. ParmentierEmail author


Numerous studies have demonstrated that rare and unexpected changes in an otherwise repetitive or structured sound sequence ineluctably break through selective attention and impact negatively on performance in an unrelated task. While the electrophysiological responses to unexpected sounds have been extensively studied, behavioral distraction has received relatively less attention until recently. In this paper, I review work examining the cognitive underpinnings of behavioral distraction by deviant sounds and highlight some of its key determinants. Evidence indicates that deviance distraction (1) derives from the time penalty associated with the involuntary orientation of attention to and away from the deviant sound and from resulting effects such as the reactivation of the relevant task set upon the presentation of the target stimulus; and (2) is mediated by a number of factors (some increasing distraction, such as aging or induced emotions; some decreasing it, such as a memory load or cognitive control). Contrary to the received view that deviants ineluctably elicit distraction, recent work demonstrates that it is contingent upon auditory distractors acting as unspecific warning signals in the service of goal-oriented behavior, and that deviants do not elicit distraction because they are rare but because they violate the cognitive system’s predictions (which can be manipulated through implicit rule learning or explicit cueing). Evidence is also presented indicating that the capture of attention by spoken deviant sounds is followed by an involuntary evaluation of their semantic properties, the outcome of which can be robust enough to linger in working memory and interfere with subsequent behavior. Finally, I review studies suggesting that behavioral deviance distraction is not the mere byproduct of the mismatch negativity, P3a and re-orientation negativity electrophysiological responses and highlight a number of outstanding questions for future research.


Auditory Stimulus Event Information Deviant Stimulus Oddball Task Irrelevant Sound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by a research grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PSI-2009-08427) and Plan E, as well as a Ramon y Cajal Fellowship (RYC-2007-00701) awarded to Fabrice Parmentier.


  1. Ahveninen, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Pekkonen, E., Hallberg, A., Hietanen, M., Näätänen, R., et al. (2000). Increased distractibility by task-irrelevant sound changes in abstinent alcoholics. Clinical Experimental Research, 24, 1850–1854.Google Scholar
  2. Andrés, P., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Escera, C. (2006). The effect of age on the involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: A test of the frontal hypothesis of aging. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2564–2568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Deouell, L. Y., Wetzel, N., Mädebach, A., & Schröger, E. (2010). The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2131–2139.Google Scholar
  4. Bendixen, A., Prinz, W., Horváth, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Schröger, E. (2008). Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Neuroimage, 41, 1111–1119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendixen, A., SanMiguel, I., & Schröger, E. (2013). Early electrophysiological indicators of predictive processing in audition: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 120–131.Google Scholar
  7. Bendixen, A., & Schröger, E. (2008). Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attention contexts. Biological Psychology, 78, 231–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bendixen, A., Schröger, E., Ritter, W., & Winkler, I. (2012). Regularity extraction from non-adjacent sounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00143.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bendixen, A., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8447–8451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berti, S. (2008a). Cognitive control after distraction: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45, 608–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Berti, S. (2008b). Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 434, 200–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Berti, S. (2012). Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection. NeuroReport, 23, 441–446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Berti, S. (2013). The role of auditory transient and deviance processing in distraction of task performance: A combined behavioral and event-related brain potential study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 352. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00352.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Berti, S., Grunwald, M., & Schröger, E. (2013). Age dependent changes of distractibility and reorienting of attention revisited: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1491, 156–166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Berti, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51, 249–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction: Behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 265–273. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00044-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: Evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119–1122. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02527.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction effects in vision: Behavioral and event-related potential indices. NeuroReport, 15, 665–669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bodenhausen, G. V., Gabriel, S., & Lineberger, M. (2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11, 320–323.Google Scholar
  20. Boll, S., & Berti, S. (2009). Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 46, 645–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Boulter, L. R. (1977). Attention and reaction times to signals of uncertain modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 379–388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bubic, A., von Cramon, D. Y., Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., & Schubotz, R. I. (2008). Violation of expectation: Neural correlate reflect bases of prediction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 155–168.Google Scholar
  24. Buchner, A., Zabal, A., & Mayr, S. (2003). Auditory, visual, and cross-modal negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 917–923.Google Scholar
  25. Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Toth, J. P. (2008). Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory& Cognition, 36, 1484–1494.Google Scholar
  26. Bush, G., Whalen, P. J., Rosen, B. R., Jenike, M. A., McInerney, S. C., & Rauch, S. L. (1998). The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 270–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cashdollar, N., Fukuda, K., Bocklage, A., Aurtenetxe, S., Vogel, E. K., & Gazzaley, A. (2013). Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 28, 77–86.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cheal, M., & Gregory, M. (1997). Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 51–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chiu, Y.-C., Aron, A. R., & Verbruggen, F. (2012). Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus–stop association: Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1908–1918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Costa-Faidella, J., Grimm, S., Slabu, L., Díaz-Santaella, F., & Escera, C. (2011). Multiple time scales of adaptation in the auditory system as revealed by human evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 48, 774–783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Czigler, I., Cox, T. J., Gyimesi, K., & Horváth, J. (2007). Event-related potential study to aversive auditory stimuli. Neuroscience Letters, 420, 251–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Czigler, I., & Winkler, I. (2012). Evidence from auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of deviance detection (MMN and vMMN) linking predictive coding theories and perceptual object representations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 132–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Domínguez-Borràs, J., Garcia-Garcia, M., & Escera, C. (2008). Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 1199–1206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Drazin, D. H. (1961). Effects of foreperiod, variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 43–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Elliott, E. M., & Cowan, N. (2001). Habituation to auditory distracters in a cross-modal, color–word interference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 654–667.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Elliott, E. M., Cowan, N., & Valle-Inclan, F. (1998). The nature of cross-modal color–word interference effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 761–767.Google Scholar
  37. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Escera, C., Yago, E., & Alho, K. (2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 877–883.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Escera, C., Yago, E., Corral, M. J., Corbera, S., & Nuñez, M. I. (2003). Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: Semantic analysis follows attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2408–2412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Fan, J., Flombaum, J. J., McCandliss, B. D., Thomas, K. M., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage, 18, 42–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Fan, J., Kolster, R., Ghajar, J., Suh, M., Knight, R. T., Sarkar, R., et al. (2007). Response anticipation and response conflict: An event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2272–2282.Google Scholar
  42. Frangos, J., Ritter, W., & Friedman, D. (2005). Brain potentials to sexually suggestive whistles show meaning modulates the mismatch negativity. NeuroReport, 16, 1313–1317.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Dziobek, I. (2003). Cross-form conceptual relations between sounds and words: Effects on the novelty P3. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 58–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Getzmann, S., Gajewski, P. D., & Falkenstein, M. (2013). Does age increase auditory distraction? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in seniors. Neurobiology of Aging, 34, 1952–1962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Grillon, C., Courchesne, E., Ameli, R., Geyer, M., & Braff, D. L. (1990). Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 171–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Grimm, S., Bendixen, A., Deouell, L. Y., & Schröger, S. (2009). Distraction in a visual multi-deviant paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 260–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Grimm, S., Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Bäß, P., Roye, A., & Deouell, L. Y. (2008). Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 934–947.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237.Google Scholar
  50. Haenschel, C., Vernon, D. J., Dwivedi, P., Gruzelier, J. H., & Baldeweg, T. (2005). Event-related brain potential correlates of human auditory sensory memory-trace formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 10494–10501.Google Scholar
  51. Hanauer, J. B., & Brooks, P. J. (2003). Developmental change in the cross-modal Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 359–366.Google Scholar
  52. Harvey, N. (1980). Non-informative effects of stimuli functioning as cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 413–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ho, C., & Spence, C. (2006). Verbal interface design: Do verbal directional cues automatically orient visual spatial attention? Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 733–748.Google Scholar
  54. Hölig, C., & Berti, S. (2010). To switch of not to switch: Brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features. Brain Research, 1345, 164–175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Horváth, J., & Bendixen, A. (2012). Preventing distraction by probabilistic cueing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 342–347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Horváth, J., & Burgyán, A. (2011). Distraction and the auditory attentional blink. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 695–701.Google Scholar
  57. Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Birkás, E., Winkler, I., & Gervai, J. (2009). Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 1157–1172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Horváth, J., Roeber, U., Bendixen, A., & Schröger, E. (2008a). Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events. Brain Research, 1229, 193–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Horváth, J., Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2011). Preventing distraction: Assessing stimulus-specific and general effects of the predictive cueing of deviant auditory events. Biological Psychology, 87, 35–48.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Horváth, J., & Winkler, I. (2010). Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task. Biological Psychology, 83, 229–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Horváth, J., Winkler, I., & Bendixen, A. (2008b). Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction? Biological Psychology, 79, 139–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hughes, R. W., Hurlstone, M. J., Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2013). Cognitive control of auditory distraction: Impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 539–553.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall—violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds—support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Itti, L., & Baldi, P. (2009). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research, 49, 1295–1306.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Jääskeläinen, I. P., Alho, K., Escera, C., Winkler, I., Sillanaukee, P., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Effects of ethanol and auditory distraction on forced choice reaction time. Alcohol, 13, 153–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Jankowiak, S., & Berti, S. (2007). Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. Psychophysiology, 44, 79–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Jentzsch, I., & Dudschig, C. (2009). Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of post-error slowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 209–218.Google Scholar
  69. Kähkönen, S., Ahveninen, J., Pekkonen, E., Kaakkola, S., Huttunen, R. J., & Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2002). Dopamine modulates involuntary shifting and reorienting: An electromagnetic study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1894–1902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.Google Scholar
  71. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffman, J. (2006). Evidence of task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800–806.Google Scholar
  72. Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). Task switching—maturation of a paradigm. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 1–4.Google Scholar
  73. Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Schröger, E. (2007). The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Biological Psychology, 74, 1–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus–response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198–205.Google Scholar
  75. Laming, D. R. J. (1979). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43, 199–224.Google Scholar
  76. Lawo, V., Philipp, A. M., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2012). The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1130–1137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Li, C.-S. R., Huang, C., Yan, P., Paliwal, P., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R. (2008). Neural correlates of post-error slowing during a stop signal task—a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1021–1029.Google Scholar
  79. Li, B., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Zhang, M. (2013). Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound’s informational value: Evidence from an auditory discrimination task. Experimental Psychology, 60, 260–268.Google Scholar
  80. Ljungberg, J. K., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2012a). The impact of intonation and valence on objective and subjective attention capture by auditory alarms. Human Factors, 54, 826–837.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Ljungberg, J. K., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2012b). Cross-modal distraction by deviance: Functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities. Experimental Psychology, 59, 355–363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Ljungberg, J. K., Parmentier, F. B. R., Hughes, R. W., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2012a). Listen out! Behavioral and subjective responses to verbal warnings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 451–461.Google Scholar
  83. Ljungberg, J. K., Parmentier, F. B. R., Leiva, A., & Vega, N. (2012b). The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: The role of event information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1461–1468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., & Hawkins, H. L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 725–737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Macdonald, A. W., I. I. I., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Mager, R., Falkenstein, M., Störmer, R., Brand, S., Müller-Spahn, F., & Bullinger, A. (2004). Auditory distraction in young and middle-aged adults: A behavioural and event-related potential study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 112, 1165–1176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Zacks, R. T. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Melara, R. D., Wang, H., Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Attentional origins of the Simon effect: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Brain Research, 1215, 147–159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Melcher, T., & Gruber, O. (2009). Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: An event-related fMRI study. Cortex, 45, 189–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–288.Google Scholar
  94. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  95. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826–859.Google Scholar
  97. Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.Google Scholar
  98. Nordby, H., Roth, W. T., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1988). Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. Psychophysiology, 25, 262–268.Google Scholar
  99. Nöstl, A., Marsh, J., & Sörqvist, P. (2012). Expectations modulate the magnitude of attentional capture by auditory events. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e48569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048569.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111, 275–279.Google Scholar
  101. Núñez Castellar, E., Küin, S., Fias, W., & Notebaert, W. (2010). Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP Support. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 270–278.Google Scholar
  102. Paavilainen, P., Arajärvi, P., & Takegata, R. (2007). Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features. Neuroreport, 18, 159–163.Google Scholar
  103. Paavilainen, P., Simola, J., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., Winkler, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology, 38, 359–365.Google Scholar
  104. Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2013). Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli. Emotion. doi: 10.1037/a0034289 (Advance online publication).
  105. Parmentier, F. B. R. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Parmentier, F. B. R., & Andrés, P. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: Novelty and post-novelty distraction in young and older adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 68–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., Escera, C., Andrés, P., & San Miguel, I. (2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011a). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2010a). Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: The role of the distracter’s informational value. Cognition, 115, 504–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J., & Maybery, M. T. (2010b). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: A study of voice–location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 279–284.Google Scholar
  111. Parmentier, F. B. R., & Hebrero, M. (2013). Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1635–1641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Parmentier, F. B. R., Ljungberg, J. K., Elsley, J. V., & Lindkvist, M. (2011b). A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1134–1139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Elsley, J. V. (2011c). Distraction by auditory novelty: The course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects. Experimental Psychology, 58, 92–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Perez, L. (2013). A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi: 10.1037/a0031550 (Advance online publication).
  115. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Reiche, M., Hartwigsen, G., Widmann, A., Saur, D., Schröger, E., & Bendixen, A. (2013). Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: A combined behavioral—event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1490, 153–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Rinne, T., Särkkä, A., Dergerman, A., Schröger, E., & Alho, K. (2006). Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention. Brain Research, 1077, 135–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Roeber, U., Berti, S., Müller, D., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2009). Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus–response sequence. Psychophysiology, 46, 425–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 451–456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Roeber, U., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2003). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 347–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Roelofs, A. (2005). The visual–auditory color–word Stroop asymmetry and its time course. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1325–1336.Google Scholar
  122. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.Google Scholar
  123. Roye, A., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2007). Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: An event-related potential study with ringtones. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 784–790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. SanMiguel, I., Corral, M. J., & Escera, C. (2008). When loading working memory reduces distraction: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory–visual distraction paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1131–1145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. SanMiguel, I., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010a). Attention capture by novel sounds: Distraction versus facilitation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 481–515.Google Scholar
  126. SanMiguel, I., Morgan, H. M., Klein, C., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010b). On the functional significance of Novelty-P3: Facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biological Psychology, 83, 143–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Santens, S., & Verguts, T. (2011). The size congruity effect: Is bigger always more? Cognition, 118, 94–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 527–539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Schröger, E. (2005). The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 91, 490–501.Google Scholar
  131. Schröger, E. (2007). Mismatch negativity: A microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 138–146.Google Scholar
  132. Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Roeber, U. (2007). Processing of abstract rule violations in audition. PLoS ONE, 2, e1131.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Schröger, E., Giard, M.-H., & Wolff, Ch. (2000). Auditory distraction: Event-related potential and behavioral indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1450–1460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998a). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355–3358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998b). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2010). Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution. Acta Psychologica, 135, 302–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1037–1054.Google Scholar
  138. Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1083–1092.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2003). Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 630–637.Google Scholar
  140. Tilman, C. M., & Wiens, S. (2011). Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks. Psychophysiology, 48, 1405–1411.Google Scholar
  141. Turatto, M., Benso, F., Galfano, G., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 628–639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Ullsperger, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Subprocesses of performance monitoring: A dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. Neuroimage, 14, 1387–1401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Van Mourik, R., Oosterlaan, J., Heslenfeld, D. J., Konig, C. E., & Sergeant, J. A. (2007). When distraction is not distracting: A behavioral and ERP study on distraction in ADHD. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 1855–1865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 27, 497–504.Google Scholar
  145. van Zuijen, T. L., Simoens, V. L., Paavilainen, P., Näätänen, R. & Tervaniemi, M. (2006) Implicit, intuitive and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1292–1303.Google Scholar
  146. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649–672.Google Scholar
  147. Wacongne, C., Changeux, J. P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3665–3678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Wessel, J.R., Danielmeier, C., Morton, B., & Ullsperger, M. (2012). Surprise and error: Common neuronalarchitecture for the processing of errors and novelty. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7528–7537.Google Scholar
  149. Wetzel, N., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction and reorientation in children: A behavioral and ERP study. NeuroReport, 15, 1355–1358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Wetzel, N., & Schröger, E. (2007). Cognitive control of involuntary attention and distraction in children and adolescents. Brain Research, 1155, 134–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Wetzel, N., Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (2013). The dissociation between the P3a event-related potential and behavioral distraction. Psychophysiology (in press).Google Scholar
  152. Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2009). The cognitive control of distraction by novelty in children aged 7–8 and adults. Psychophysiology, 46, 607–616.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2012). Distraction and facilitation—two faces of the same coin? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 664–674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147–163.Google Scholar
  155. Winkler, I., & Czigler, I. (1998). Mismatch negativity: deviance detection or the maintenance of the “standard”. NeuroReport, 9, 3809–3813.Google Scholar
  156. Woods, D. L. (1992). Auditory selective attention in middleaged and elderly subjects: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 456–468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Yeung, N., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 939–959.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Research Institute of Health Sciences, Neuropsychology and Cognition GroupUniversity of the Balearic IslandsPalma de Mallorca, Balearic IslandsSpain
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations