Memory for surface features of unfamiliar melodies: independent effects of changes in pitch and tempo
- 464 Downloads
A melody’s identity is determined by relations between consecutive tones in terms of pitch and duration, whereas surface features (i.e., pitch level or key, tempo, and timbre) are irrelevant. Although surface features of highly familiar recordings are encoded into memory, little is known about listeners’ mental representations of melodies heard once or twice. It is also unknown whether musical pitch is represented additively or interactively with temporal information. In two experiments, listeners heard unfamiliar melodies twice in an initial exposure phase. In a subsequent test phase, they heard the same (old) melodies interspersed with new melodies. Some of the old melodies were shifted in key, tempo, or key and tempo. Listeners’ task was to rate how well they recognized each melody from the exposure phase while ignoring changes in key and tempo. Recognition ratings were higher for old melodies that stayed the same compared to those that were shifted in key or tempo, and detrimental effects of key and tempo changes were additive in between-subjects (Experiment 1) and within-subjects (Experiment 2) designs. The results confirm that surface features are remembered for melodies heard only twice. They also imply that key and tempo are processed and stored independently.
KeywordsMusic Training Exposure Phase Absolute Pitch Pitch Change Pitch Accent
This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Andrew Griffith, Monika Mankarious, and Elizabeth Sharma assisted in recruiting and testing participants. Rogério Lira helped in producing the figures.
- Halpern, A. R. (1984). Perception of structure in novel music. Memory & Cognition, 12, 163–170.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
- Jones, M. R. (1993). Dynamics of musical patterns: How do melody and rhythm fit together? In T. J. Tighe & W. J. Dowling (Eds.), Psychology and music: The understanding of melody and rhythm (pp. 67–92). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Slavin, S. (2010). PsyScript (Version 2.3.0) [software]. Available from https://open.psych.lancs.ac.uk/software/PsyScript.html.