Subjective criteria and illusions in visual testing: some methodological limitations
It is argued that illusions cannot generally be investigated with criterion-independent methods. This limits the value of the data obtained from them. This is particularly important when the results are compared between groups of subjects, for example, between dyslexic readers and controls, since it is possible that the differences between the groups reflect differences with regard to criteria rather than real perceptual differences.
- Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1974). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington: Krieger.Google Scholar
- Lallier, M., Thierry, G., Tainturier, M.-J., Donnadieu, S., Peyrin, C., Billard, C., et al. (2009). Auditory and visual stream segregation in children and adults: An assessment of the amodality assumption of the ‘sluggish attentional shifting’ theory of dyslexia. Brain Research, 1302, 132–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Macmillan, N. A., & Creeman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory—a user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Swets, J. A., Tanner, W. P., & Birdsall, T. G. (1964). Decision processes in perception. In J. A. Swets (Ed.), Signal detection and recognition by human observers (pp. 3–57). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ternus, J. (1926). Experimentelle Untersuchungen uber phanomenale Identitat. Psychologishe Forschung, 7, 81–135. (English translation: (1938). The problem of phenomenal identity. In: Ellis, W.D., (Ed.), A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 149–160) London: Routledge Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar