Psychological Research

, Volume 77, Issue 6, pp 738–747 | Cite as

Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting

Original Article

Abstract

Evidence suggests that religious systems have specific effects on attentional and action control processes. The present study investigated whether religions also modulate choices that involve higher-order knowledge and the delay of gratification in particular. We tested Dutch Calvinists, Italian Catholics, and Atheists from both countries/cultures using an intertemporal choice task where participants could choose between a small immediate and a larger delayed monetary reward. Based on the Calvinist theory of predestination and the Catholic concept of a cycle of sin–confession–expiation, we predicted a reduced delay tolerance, i.e., higher discount rate, for Italian Catholics than for Dutch Calvinists, and intermediate rates for the two atheist groups. Analyses of discount rates support our hypotheses. We also found a magnitude effect on temporal discounting and faster responses for large than for small rewards across religions and countries/cultures. We conclude that temporal discounting is specifically modulated by religious upbringing rather than by generic cultural differences.

Supplementary material

426_2012_473_MOESM1_ESM.doc (63 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 63 kb)

References

  1. Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berns, G., Laibson, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Intertemporal choice—toward an integrative framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 482–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In I. Brocas & J. Carrillo (Eds.), The psychology of economic decisions (Vol. 1, pp. 105–126)., Rationality and well-being Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, H., Ng, S., & Rao, A. (2005). Cultural differences in consumer impatience. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colzato, L., van Beest, I., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Scorolli, C., Dorchin, S., Meiran, N., et al. (2010). God, do I have your attention? Cognition, 117, 87–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W., & Hommel, B. (2008). Losing the big picture: how religion controls visual attention. PLoS ONE, 3(11), e3679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curry, O., Price, M. E., & Price, J. G. (2008). Patience is a virtue: cooperative people have lower discount rates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 780–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Record, 52, 479–492.Google Scholar
  9. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J., & Soutter, C. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, L., Fry, A., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting. In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 67–92). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 418–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris, A., & Madden, G. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychological Record, 52, 429–440.Google Scholar
  15. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 simple societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2010). Religion as a control guide: on the impact of religion on cognition. Zygon. Journal of Religion & Science, 45, 596–604.Google Scholar
  18. Hommel, B., Colzato, L., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2011). Action control and religion: faith-specific modulation of the Simon effect but not stop-signal performance. Cognition, 120, 177–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ito, M., Saeki, D., & Green, L. (2011). Sharing, discounting and selfishness: a Japanese–American comparison. The Psychological Record, 60, 59–76.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2009). Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 61–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kacen, J., & Lee, J. (2002). The influence of culture on consumer impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, B., Sung, Y. S., & McClure, S. (2012). The neural basis of cultural differences in delay discounting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 650–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirby, K. (1997). Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirby, K. (2009). One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirby, K., & Marakovic, N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirby, K., & Petry, N. (2004). Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. Addiction, 99, 461–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: a cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lagorio, C. H., & Madden, G. J. (2005). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioral Processes, 69, 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levine, R., Norenzayan, A., & Philbrick, K. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 543–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 139–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Madden, G., & Johnson, P. (2010). A delay-discounting primer. In G. Madden & W. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 11–37). Washington: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A., Mueller, A., Hehli, D., et al. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards. Part II: between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 251–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahajna, A., Ben-Zion, U., Bogaire, R., & Shavit, T. (2007). Subjective discount rates among Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews. Working Papers 07–10, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  38. Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCullough, M., & Willoughby, B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H., & Fehr, E. (2010). Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 1858–1863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moyer, R., & Bayer, R. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect. Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nisbett, R., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11163–11170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nisbett, R., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in Ultimatum Game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paglieri, F. (in press). The costs of delay. Waiting vs. postponing in intertemporal choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  46. Petry, N. (2001). Pathological gamblers, with and without substance abuse disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 482–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rachlin, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. (2008). Social discounting and delay discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rachlin, H., & Raineri, A. (1992). Irrationality, impulsiveness, and selfishness as discount reversal effects. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 93–118). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  50. Rosati, A. G., Stevens, J. R., Hare, B., & Hauser, M. D. (2007). The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults. Current Biology, 17, 1663–1668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sozou, P. (1998). On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 2015–2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stevens, J., & Hauser, M. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strotz, R. (1956). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time-perception. Medical Hypotheses, 65, 691–693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Takahashi, T., Hadzibeganovic, T., Cannas, S., Makino, T., Fukui, H., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Cultural neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 30(2), 185–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tan, C., & Johnson, R. (1996). To wait or not to wait: the influence of culture on discounting behavior. In W. Loke (Ed.), Perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 297–305). Maryland: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  57. Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. (2003). Religion: an overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsukayama, T., & Duckworth, A. L. (2010). Domain-specific temporal discounting and temptation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 72–82.Google Scholar
  59. Weber, M. (1958/2003). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Zauberman, G., Kim, B., Malkoc, S., & Bettman, J. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goal-Oriented Agents Lab (GOAL), Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della CognizioneCNRRomeItaly
  2. 2.Embodied Cognition Lab (EMCO), Dipartimento di PsicologiaUniversità degli Studi di BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della CognizioneRomeItaly
  4. 4.Cognitive Psychology Unit and Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations