Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 77, Issue 4, pp 422–433 | Cite as

The effect of state anxiety on the online and offline control of fast target-directed movements

  • Gavin P. Lawrence
  • Michael A. Khan
  • Lew Hardy
Original Article

Abstract

In target-directed aiming, afferent information is used to adjust limb trajectories during movement execution (i.e. online) and to enhance the programming of subsequent trials (i.e. offline). The objective of the present study was to determine the influence of state anxiety on both online and offline afferent information processing for the first time. Participants practiced either a directional aiming task (Experiment 1) or an amplitude aiming task (Experiment 2) without anxiety before being transferred to a high anxiety condition. In both experiments, results revealed that anxiety resulted in a decrement in performance. Furthermore, use of afferent information to adjust movement trajectories online was disrupted when movements were performed with anxiety, whereas there were no differences in the offline processing of afferent information between the low anxiety and high anxiety conditions.

Keywords

Movement Time Constant Error Movement Execution Home Position Afferent Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abahnini, K., & Proteau, L. (1999). The role of peripheral and central visual information for the directional control of manual movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 160–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abahnini, K., Proteau, L., & Temprado, J. J. (1997). Evidence supporting the importance of peripheral visual information for the directional control of aiming movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 230–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bard, C., Paillard, J., Fleury, M., Hay, L., & Larue, J. (1990). Positional versus directional control loops in visuomotor pointing. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 39, 151–161.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure—self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skilful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 610–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2003). On the role of peripheral visual afferent information for the control of rapid video-aiming movements. Acta Psychologica, 113, 99–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2004). On-line vs. off-line utilisation of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology—General, 130(4), 701–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beilock, S. L., Jellison, W. A., Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Carr, T. H. (2006). On the causal mechanisms of stereotype threat: can skills that don’t rely heavily on working memory still be threatened? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1059–1071.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Briere, J., & Proteau, L. (2011). Automatic movement error detection and correction processes in reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 208(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlton, L. G. (1992). Visual processing time and the control of movement. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 3–31). North-Holland: Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coombes, S. A., Higgins, T., Gamble, K. M., Cauraugh, J. H., & Janelle, C. M. (2009). Attentional control theory: anxiety, emotion, and motor planning. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(8), 1072–1079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on the utilization and organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66(3), 183–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance—the processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6(6), 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franklin, D. W., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008). Specificity of reflex adaptation for task-relevant variability. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(52), 14165–14175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glover, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(1), 3–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray, R. (2004). Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: expertise differences, choking, and slumps. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 10(1), 42–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardy, L., Beattie, S., & Woodman, T. (2007). Anxiety-induced performance catastrophes: investigating effort required as an asymmetry factor. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 15–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardy, L., Mullen, R., & Martin, N. (2001). Effect of task-relevant cues and state anxiety on motor performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92(3), 943–946.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janelle, C. M., Singer, R. N., & Williams, A. M. (1999). External distraction and attentional narrowing: visual search evidence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21(1), 70–91.Google Scholar
  21. Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., Lawrence, G. P., Chua, R., Bernier, P. M., et al. (2006). Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(8), 1106–1121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., & Goodman, D. (1998). The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: evidence for an interdependency between programming and feedback processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan, M. A., & Franks, I. M. (2003). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the production of component submovements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(3), 285–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G., Fourkas, A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., & Pembroke, S. (2003a). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. Acta Psychologica, 113(1), 83–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G. P., Franks, I. M., & Elliott, D. (2003b). The utilization of visual feedback in the control of movement direction: evidence from a video aiming task. Motor Control, 7(3), 290–303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G. P., Franks, I. M., & Buckloz, E. (2004). The utilization of visual feedback from peripheral and central vision in the control of direction. Experimental Brain Research, 158(2):241–251.Google Scholar
  27. Krane, V. (1994). The mental readiness form as a measure of competitive state anxiety. Sport Psychologist, 8(2), 189–202.Google Scholar
  28. Lawrence, G. P., Khan, M. A., Buckolz, E., & Oldham, A. R. H. (2006). The contribution of peripheral and central vision in the control of movement amplitude. Human Movement Science, 25(3), 326–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawrence, G. P., Khan, M. A., Mourton, S., & Bernier, P.-M. (2011). The reliance on visual feedback for online and offline processing. Motor Control, 15(2), 232–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis, B. P., & Linder, D. E. (1997). Thinking about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(9), 937–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how—the role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2008). The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 160–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mullen, R., Hardy, L., & Tattersall, A. (2005). The effects of anxiety on motor performance: a test of the conscious processing hypothesis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27(2), 212–225.Google Scholar
  34. Murray, N. P., & Janelle, C. M. (2003). Anxiety and performance: a visual search examination of the processing efficiency theory. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(2), 171–187.Google Scholar
  35. Paillard, J., & Amblard, B. (1985). Static versus kinetic visual cues for the processing of spatial relationships. In D. J. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, & D. N. Lee (Eds.), Brain mechanism in spatial vision (pp. 367–385). La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  36. Parfitt, G., & Hardy, L. (1993). The effects of competitive anxiety on memory span and rebound shooting tasks in basketball players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 11(6), 517–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., Girouard, Y., & Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science, 6(2), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Proteau, L., Roujoula, A., & Messier, J. (2009). Evidence for continuous processing of visual information in a manual video-aiming task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(3), 219–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T. (1979). Motor-output variability—theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86(5), 415–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Temprado, J. J., Vieilledent, S., & Proteau, L. (1996). Afferent information for motor control: the role of visual information in different portions of the movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28(3), 280–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson, M. (2008). From processing efficiency to attentional control: a mechanistic account of the anxiety-performance relationship. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 92–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zijlstra, F. R. H. (1993) Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools. Delft: Delft University Press (Doctoral dissertation, Technical University Delft).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin P. Lawrence
    • 1
  • Michael A. Khan
    • 2
  • Lew Hardy
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, Institute for the Psychology of Elite PerformanceBangor UniversityBangorUK
  2. 2.Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Human KineticsUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations