The cost of serially chaining two cognitive operations
- 273 Downloads
As Turing (1936, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society) noted, a fundamental process in human cognition is to effect chained sequential operations in which the second operation requires an input from the preceding one. Although a great deal is known about the costs associated with ‘independent’ (unrelated) operations, e.g., from the classic psychological refractory period paradigm, far less is known about those operations to which Turing referred. We present the results of two behavioural experiments, where participants were required to perform two speeded sequential tasks that were either chained or independent. Both experiments reveal the reaction time cost of chaining, over and above classical dual-task serial costs. Moreover, the chaining operation significantly altered the distribution of reaction times relative to the Independent condition in terms of an increased mean and variance. These results are discussed in terms of the cognitive architecture underlying the serial chaining of cognitive operations.
KeywordsAttentional Blink Independent Condition Practice Block Psychological Refractory Period Central Fixation Point
This study was funded by a grant from the Human Frontier Science Program to S. Dehaene, K. Shapiro, P. Roelfsema, M. Sigman and W. Vanduffel.
- Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., & Bherer, L. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1262–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65.Google Scholar
- Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1999). Precis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from computational modeling of human multiple-task performance. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII (pp. 15–88). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Dynamics of the central bottleneck: Dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biology, 4(7), e220. doi:210.1371/journal.pbio.0040220.
- Turing, A. M. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42.Google Scholar