Psychological Research PRPF

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 59–70 | Cite as

In hindsight, life flows from left to right

  • Julio Santiago
  • Antonio Román
  • Marc Ouellet
  • Nieves Rodríguez
  • Pilar Pérez-Azor
Original Article

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the mental representation of meaningful event sequences. Experiment 1 used extended (5 min long) naturalistic scenes excerpted from commercial movies. Experiments 2 and 3 presented everyday activities by means of sequences of six photographs. All experiments found both left–right and distance effects in an order decision task, suggesting that when contemplated in hindsight, experienced events unfold along a left-to-right analogical mental line. Present results are discussed in the context of the mental representation of other kinds of ordinal sequences, and other left–right effects reported in non-ordinal domains.

References

  1. Altmann, L. J. P., Saleem, A., Kendall, D., Heilman, K. M., & Rothi, L. J. G. (2006). Orthographic directionality and thematic role illustration in English and Arabic. Brain and Language, 97, 306–316.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, A. M., Kim, M., Crucian, G. P., & Heilman, K. M. (2002). Spatial bias: Effects of early reading direction on Korean subjects. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1003–1012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Kerzel, D. (2004). A Simon Effect With Stationary Moving Stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 39–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bush, L. K., Hess, U., & Wolford, G. (1993). Transformations for within-subject designs: A Monte-Carlo investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 566–579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterworth, B. (2003). Pointing is the royal road to language for babies. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 9–34). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Cappelletti, M., Freeman, E. D., & Cipolotti, L. (2007). The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical number lines in neglect. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2989–3000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2007). Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition, 102, 101–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chatterjee, A. (2001). Language and space: Some interactions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 55–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatterjee, A., Maher, L. M., Gonzalez-Rothi, L., & Heilman, K. M. (1995). Asyntactic thematic role assignment: The use of a temporal-spatial strategy. Brain and Language, 49, 125–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee, A., Southwood, M. H., & Basilico, D. (1999). Verbs, events and spatial representations. Neuropsychologia, 37, 395–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doricci, F., Guariglia, P., Gasparini, M., & Tomaiuolo, F. (2005). Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1663–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fias, W., & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial Representation of Numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (pp. 43–54). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87–B95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2004). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organised: Evidence from days of the week. Cortex, 40, 171–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Longo, M. R., & Lourenço, S. F. (2007). Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1400–1407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maas, A., & Russo, A. (2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture? Psychological Science, 14, 296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maher, L. M., Chatterjee, A., Gonzalez-Rothi, L., & Heilman, K. M. (1995). Agrammatic sentence production: The use of a temporal-spatial strategy. Brain and Language, 49, 105–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: convergent evidence from aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cogn Sci, 30, 1–49.Google Scholar
  28. Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Funes, M. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2008) Thinking about time makes attention move to the sides (submitted)Google Scholar
  29. Price, M. C., & Mentzoni, R. A. (2008). Where is January? The month-SNARC effect in sequence-form synaesthetes. Cortex, 44, 890–907.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Priftis, K., Zorzi, M., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Explicit vs. implicit processing of representational space in neglect: Dissociations in accessing the mental number line. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 680–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Proctor, R., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: a general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rinaldi, M. C., & Pizzamiglio, L. (2006). When space merges into language. Neuropsychologia, 44, 556–565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 512–516.Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
  35. Stoianov, I., Kramer, P., Umiltá, C., & Zorzi, M. (2008). Visuospatial priming of the mental number line. Cognition, 106, 770–779.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Funes, M. J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tversky, B. (2004). Narratives of space, time, and life. Mind and Language, 19, 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vallesi, A., Binns, M. A. & Shallice, T. (in press) An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: Understanding the cognitive representations of time. Cognition.Google Scholar
  40. Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Weger, U. & Pratt, J. (in press) Time flies like an arrow: Shifting spatial attention in response to adverbs of time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.Google Scholar
  42. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSED SNARC effect in English, Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1061–1067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julio Santiago
    • 1
  • Antonio Román
    • 1
  • Marc Ouellet
    • 1
  • Nieves Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Pilar Pérez-Azor
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. de Psicología Experimental y Fisiología del ComportamientoUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations