Dimension- and space-based intertrial effects in visual pop-out search: modulation by task demands for focal-attentional processing
- 150 Downloads
Two experiments compared reaction times (RTs) in visual search for singleton feature targets defined, variably across trials, in either the color or the orientation dimension. Experiment 1 required observers to simply discern target presence versus absence (simple-detection task); Experiment 2 required them to respond to a detection-irrelevant form attribute of the target (compound-search task). Experiment 1 revealed a marked dimensional intertrial effect of 34 ms for an target defined in a changed versus a repeated dimension, and an intertrial target distance effect, with an 4-ms increase in RTs (per unit of distance) as the separation of the current relative to the preceding target increased. Conversely, in Experiment 2, the dimension change effect was markedly reduced (11 ms), while the intertrial target distance effect was markedly increased (11 ms per unit of distance). The results suggest that dimension change/repetition effects are modulated by the amount of attentional focusing required by the task, with space-based attention altering the integration of dimension-specific feature contrast signals at the level of the overall-saliency map.
KeywordsSearch Display Change Trial Dimension Repetition Singleton Feature Compound Task
The present study was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) grant PP001-110543/1 (J. Krummenacher) and German National Science Foundation (DFG) grant FOR480 (J. Krummenacher, H. J. Müller, and T. Geyer).
- Chan, L. K. H., & Hayward, W. G. (2008). Feature integration theory revisited: Dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance (in press).Google Scholar
- Geyer, T., & Müller, H. J. (2008a). Distinct, but top–down modulable color and positional priming mechanisms in visual pop-out search. Psychological Research (this issue).Google Scholar
- Geyer, T., & Müller, H. J. (2008b). Positional priming of pop-out: A relational-encoding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance (submitted).Google Scholar
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.Google Scholar
- Kingstone, A. (1992). Combining expectancies. Quarterly Journal Experimental Psychology, 44A, 69–104.Google Scholar
- Nissen, M. J. (1985). Accessing features and objects: Is location special? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 205–219). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lectures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201–237.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202–238.Google Scholar
- Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. J. (2008). A mathematical model of the dimension weighting account. Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (unpublished manuscript). Google Scholar