Psychological Research

, Volume 72, Issue 5, pp 580–586

On the interplay between familiarity and emotional expression in face perception

  • Christian Dobel
  • Lena Geiger
  • Maximilian Bruchmann
  • Christian Putsche
  • Stefan R. Schweinberger
  • Markus Junghöfer
Original Article

Abstract

Traditional models of face perception (e.g. Bruce and Young 1986) stress independent routes for processing identity and emotional expression. We investigated the interplay between familiarity and emotional expression by systematically varying both factors. In contrast to earlier studies which used binary forced-choice decisions, participants had to judge the familiarity of the presented face and the emotional hedonic valence and emotional arousal of its expressed emotion (angry, happy or neutral), using rating scales. The results demonstrated symmetric, strong interactions between familiarity and expressed emotion. Thus, this study supports more recent models of face perception (Haxby et al. 2000) that were mostly based on brain imaging data. These data together with our behavioural results emphasize the interaction of emotional expression and personal identity and support approaches that propose a relative segregation of these processes, rather than completely independent coding (Calder and Young 2005).

References

  1. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature, 393, 470–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11, 3829–3834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudouin, J. Y., Gilibert, D., Sansone, S., & Tiberghien, G. (2000). When the smile is a cue to familiarity. Memory, 8, 285–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baudouin, J. Y., Martin, F., Tiberghien, G., Verlut, I., & Franck, N. (2002). Selective attention to facial emotion and identity in schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia, 40, 503–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. Journal of Behavioural Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britton, J. C., Taylor, S. F., Sudheimer, K. D., & Liberzon, I. (2006). Facial expressions and complex IAPS pictures: common and differential networks. Neuroimage, 31(2):906–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breen, N., Caine, D., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Models of face recognition and delusional misidentification: a critical review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Johnston, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81 ,361–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Caharel, S., Courtay, N., Bernard, C., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2005). Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: An electrophysiological study. Brain and Cognition, 59, 96–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calder, A.W., & Young, A.W. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews, 6, 641–651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capgras, J. M. J., & Reboul-Lachaux, J. (1923). L’illusion des “sosies” dans un délire systematise chronique. Bulletin in Society and Clinical Medicine Mental, 11, 6–16.Google Scholar
  13. Dubois, S., Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., Bodart, J. M., Michel, C., Bruyer, R., et al. (1999). Effect of familiarity on the processing of human faces. Neuroimage, 9, 278–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ellis, H. D., & Young, A.W. (1990). Accounting for delusional misidentifications. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 239–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, H. D., & Lewis, M. B. (2001). Capgras delusion: a window on face recognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis, H. D., Young, A. W., Quayle, A. H., & De Pauw, K. W. (1997). Reduced autonomic responses to faces in Capgras delusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 264, 1085–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallegos, D. R., & Tranel, D. (2005). Positive facial affect facilitates the identification of famous faces. Brain and Language, 93, 338–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 32–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gobbini, M. I., Leibenluft, E., Santiago, N., & Haxby, J. V. (2004). Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces. Neuroimage, 22, 1628–1635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hasselmo, M. E., Rolls, E. T., Baylis, G. C. (1989). The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey. Behavioural Brain Research, 32(3), 203–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirstein, W., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1997). Capgras’ syndrome: a novel probe for understanding the neural representation of the identity and familiarity of persons. Proceedings of the Royal society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 264, 437–444.Google Scholar
  24. Kaufmann, J. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2004). Expression influences the recognition of familiar faces. Perception, 33, 399–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kloth, N., Dobel, C., Schweinberger, S., Bölte, J., Zwitserlood, P., Junghöfer, M. (2006). Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 3317–3321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klüver, H., & Bucy, P. S. (1938). An analysis of certain effects of bilateral temporal lobectomy in the rhesus monkey with special reference to ‘psychic blindness’. Journal of Psychology, 5, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lander, K., Chuang, L., & Wickham, L. (2006). Recognizing face identity from natural and morphed smiles. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 801–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons, & M. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and emotion: sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97–135). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Leibenluft, E., Gobbini, M. I., Harrison, T., & Haxby, J. V. (2004). Mothers’ neural activation in response to pictures of their children and other children. Biological Psychiatry, 56, 225–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannengaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pourtois, G., & Vuilleumier, P. (2006). Chapter 4 dynamics of emotional effects on spatial attention in the human visual cortex. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 67–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Russel, J. A. (1979). Affective space is bipolar. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 37, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schupp, H. T., Ohman, A., Junghofer, M., Weike, A. I., Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A.O. (2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. Emotion, 4, 189–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwaninger, A., Wallraven, C., Cunningham, D.W., & Chiller-Glaus, S. (2006). Processing of facial identity and emotion in faces: A psychophysical, physiological and computational perspective. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 321–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwartz, C. E., Wright, C. I., Shin, L. M., Kagan, J., Wahlen, P. J., McMullin, K. G., et al. (2003). Differential amygdalar response to novel versus newly familiar neutral faces: a functional MRI probe developed for studying inhibited temperament. Biological Psychiatry, 53, 854–862.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schweinberger, S. R., & Soukup, G. R. (1998). Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance, 24, 1748–1765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schweinberger, S. R., Burton, A. M., & Kelly, S. W. (1999). Asymmetric relationship between identity and emotion perception: experiments with morphed faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1102–1115.Google Scholar
  39. Sergent, J., Ohta, S., MacDonald, B., & Zuck, E. (1994). Segregated processing of facial identity and emotion in the human brain: a PET-scan study. Visual Cognition, 1, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Young, A. W., Newcombe, F., de Haan, E. H. F., Small, M., & Hay, D. C. (1993). Face perception after brain injury: selective impairments affecting identity and expression. Brain, 116, 941–959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D. J., Van De Wal, C., & Johnson, M. (1996). Facial expression processing after amygdalotomy. Neuropsychologia, 34, 31–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Dobel
    • 1
  • Lena Geiger
    • 1
  • Maximilian Bruchmann
    • 1
  • Christian Putsche
    • 1
  • Stefan R. Schweinberger
    • 2
  • Markus Junghöfer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Biomagnetism and BiosignalanalysisWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyFriedrich Schiller Universität JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations