How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing
- 856 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to investigate how attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing. To address this issue, sixteen young healthy adults were asked to stand upright as immobile as possible on a force platform in both Control and Attention conditions. In the latter condition, participants were instructed to deliberately focus their attention on their body sways and to increase their active intervention into postural control. The critical analysis was focused on elementary motions computed from the centre of pressure (CoP) trajectories: (1) the vertical projection of the centre of gravity (CoGv) and (2) the difference between CoP and CoGv (CoP–CoGv). The former is recognised as an index of performance in this postural task, whilst the latter constitutes a fair expression of the ankle joint stiffness and is linked to the level of neuromuscular activity of the lower limb muscles required for controlling posture. A frequency-domain analysis showed increased amplitudes and frequencies of CoP–CoGv motions in the Attention relative to the Control condition, whereas non-significant changes were observed for the CoGv motions. Altogether, the present findings suggest that attentional focus on body sway, induced by the instructions, promoted the use of less automatic control process and hampered the efficiency for controlling posture during quiet standing.
KeywordsPostural Control Attentional Focus Attention Condition Postural Task Quiet Standing
The authors would like to thank R. A. Bianchi for technical assistance and A. Schmied and Ch. Rossi-Durand for helpful comments and suggestions. Special thanks also are extended to Jeff B. and Christelle B. for various contributions.
- Abernethy, B. (1988). Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: Some methodological constraints. Journal of Human Movement Studies 14, 101–132.Google Scholar
- Capaday, C., & Stein, R. B. (1987). Difference in the amplitude of the human soleus H reflex during walking and running. Journal of Physiology (London) 392, 513–522.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Magill, R. A. (2001). Motor learning: Concepts and applications. (6th edn.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Requin, J., & Paillard, J. (1971). Depression of monosynaptic reflexes as a specific aspect of preparatory motor set in visual reaction time. In Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (ed) Visual information processing and control of motor activity (pp. 391–396). Sofia.Google Scholar
- Rossignol, S., Lund, J. P., & Drew, T. (1988). The role of sensory inputs in regulating patterns of rhythmical movements in higher vertebrates. In A. H. Cohen, S. Rossignol, S. Grillner (eds). Neural control of rhythmic movement in vertebrates (pp. 201–283). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
- Singer, R. N., Lidor, R., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1993). To be aware or not aware: What to think about while learning and performing a motor skill. The Sport Psychologist 7, 19–30.Google Scholar
- Wulf, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 648–660.Google Scholar
- Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Park, J. -H. (2001). Attention in motor learning: Preferences of and advantages of an external focus. Reseach Quaterly for Exercise and Sport 72, 335–344.Google Scholar