Psychological Research

, Volume 69, Issue 5–6, pp 412–419 | Cite as

Working memory and flexibility in awareness and attention

Original Article

Abstract

We argue that attention and awareness form the basis of one type of working-memory storage. In contrast to models of working memory in which storage and retrieval occur effortlessly, we document that an attention-demanding goal conflict within a retrieval cue impairs recall from working memory. In a conceptual span task, semantic and color-name cues prompted recall of four consecutive words from a twelve-word list. The first-four, middle-four, and final-four words belonged to different semantic categories (e.g., body parts, animals, and tools) and were shown in different colors (e.g., red, blue, and green). In Experiment 1, the color of the cue matched that of cued items 75% of the time, and the rare mismatch impaired recall. In Experiment 2, though, the color of the cue matched that of the cued items only 25% of the time, and the now-more-frequent mismatches no longer mattered. These results are difficult to explain with passive storage alone and indicate that a processing difficulty impedes recall from working memory, presumably by distracting attention away from its storage function.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grant R01 HD-21338 awarded to Nelson Cowan from the National Institutes of Health. Michael Bunting was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Missouri from the Missouri Rehabilitation Research Training Program (Kristofer Hagglund, P.I.), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the National Institutes of Health (Grant 2 T32 HD07460-09).

References

  1. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory: Vol. 2 (pp. 89–195). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baars, B. J. (2001). A biocognitive approach to the conscious core of immediate memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 115–116.Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. D. (2001). The magic number and the episodic buffer. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 117–118.Google Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford Psychology Series No. 11. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.Google Scholar
  7. Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., & Camos, V. (2004). Time constraints and resource sharing in adults’ working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 83–100.Google Scholar
  9. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  10. Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.Google Scholar
  11. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 331–335.Google Scholar
  12. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191.Google Scholar
  13. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford Psychology Series No. 26. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.Google Scholar
  16. Cowan, N. (2005). Working-memory capacity limits in a theoretical context. In C. Izawa, & N. Ohta (Eds.), Human learning and memory: Advances in theory and application. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Craik, F. I. M., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Ishaik, G., & Anderson, N. D. (2000). Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: Differential control effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1744–1749.Google Scholar
  18. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
  19. Duff, S. C., & Logie, R. H. (2001). Processing and storage in working memory span. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 31–48.Google Scholar
  20. Haarmann, H. J., Davelaar, E. J., & Usher, M. (2003). Individual differences in semantic short-term memory capacity and reading comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 320–345.Google Scholar
  21. Hulme, C., Stuart, G., Brown G. D. A., & Morin, C. (2003). High—and low—frequency words are recalled equally well in alternating lists: Evidence for associative effects in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 500–518.Google Scholar
  22. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  23. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.Google Scholar
  24. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A, & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.Google Scholar
  25. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Long, D. L., & Prat, C. S. (2002). Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 30, 294–301.Google Scholar
  27. McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 817–835.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.Google Scholar
  29. Norman, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75, 522–536.Google Scholar
  30. Postle, B. R. (2003). Context in verbal short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1198–1207.Google Scholar
  31. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.Google Scholar
  32. Verhaeghen, P., Cerella, J., & Basak, C. (2005). A working memory workout: How to expand the focus of serial attention from one to four items, in ten hours or less. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1322–1337.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations