Psychological Research

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 59–67

Eye direction aftereffect

Original Article

Abstract

Three experiments using computer-generated human figures showed that after a prolonged observation of eyes looking to the left (or right), eyes looking directly toward the viewer appeared directed to the right (or left). Observation of an arrow pointing left or right did not induce this aftereffect on the perceived eye direction. Happy faces produced the aftereffect more effectively than surprised faces, even though the image features of the eyes were identical for both the happy and the surprised faces. These results suggest that the eye direction aftereffect may reflect the adaptation of relatively higher-level mechanisms analyzing the other’s eye direction.

References

  1. Ando, S. (2002). Luminance-induced shift in the apparent direction of gaze. Perception, 31, 657–674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995a). The eye direction detector (EDD) and the shared attention mechanism (SAM): Two cases for evolutionary psychology. In C. Moor & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: its origins and role in development (pp. 41–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995b). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S., & Cross, P. (1992). Reading the eyes: Evidence for the role of perception in the development of a theory of mind. Mind & Language, 7, 172–186.Google Scholar
  5. Coltheart, M. (1971). Visual feature-analyzers and aftereffects of tilt and curvature. Psychological Review, 78, 114–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Downing, P. E., Dodds, C. M., & Bray, D. (2004). Why does the gaze of others direct visual attention? Visual Cognition, 11, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 509–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1004–1013.Google Scholar
  9. Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490–495.Google Scholar
  11. Frisby, J. (1979). Seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hietanen, J. K. (1999). Does your gaze direction and head orientation shift my visual attention? Neuroreport, 10, 3443–3447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hietanen, J. K. (2002). Social attention orienting integrates visual information from head and body orientation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 66, 174–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hietanen, J. K., & Leppänen, J. M. (2003). Does facial expression affect attention orienting by gaze direction cues? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1228–1243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research, 33, 1219–1240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hooker, C. I., Paller, K. A., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Mesulam, M.-M., & Reber, P. J. (2003). Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 406–418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkins, J., & Langton, S. R. H. (2003). Configural processing in the perception of eye-gaze direction. Perception, 32, 1181–1188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitazaki, M., & Sato, T. (2003). Attentional modulation of self-motion perception. Perception, 32, 475–484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Köhler, W., & Emery, D. A. (1947). Figural after-effects in the third dimension of visual space. American Journal of Psychology, 60, 159–201.Google Scholar
  20. Langton, S. R. H. (2000). The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 825–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langton, S. R. H., & Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6, 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langton, S. R. H., Watt, R. J., & Bruce, V. (2000). Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 50–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mathews, A., Fox, E., Yiend, J., & Calder, A. (2003). The face of fear: Effects of eye gaze and emotion on visual attention. Visual Cognition, 10, 823–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Leary, A., & McMahon, M. (1991). Adaptation to form distortion of a familiar shape. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 328–332.Google Scholar
  27. Perrett, D. I., & Emery, N. J. (1994). Understanding the intentions of others from visual signals: Neurophysiological evidence. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 13, 683–694.Google Scholar
  28. Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W., & Benson, P. J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 335, 23–30.Google Scholar
  29. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558–566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ricciardelli, P., Baylis, G., & Driver, J. (2000). The positive and negative of human expertise in gaze perception. Cognition, 77, B1–B14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (2002). Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 507–513.Google Scholar
  32. Seyama, J., & Nagayama, R. S. (2002). Perceived eye size is larger in happy faces than in surprised faces. Perception, 31, 1153–1155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Seyama, J., & Nagayama, R. S. (in press). The effect of torso direction on the judgment of eye direction. Visual Cognition.Google Scholar
  34. Sinha, P. (2000). Here’s looking at you, kid. Perception, 29, 1005–1008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Spivey, M. J., & Spirn, M. J. (2000). Selective visual attention modulates the direct tilt aftereffect. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1525–1533.Google Scholar
  36. Tomonaga, M., Kumada, T., & Yoshikawa, S. (2002). Visual cognition from the standpoint of comparative cognitive science. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 20, 193–208.Google Scholar
  37. Troje, N. F., & Siebeck, U. (1998). Illumination-induced apparent shift in orientation of human heads. Perception, 27, 671–680.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161–204.Google Scholar
  39. von Grünau, M., & Anston, C. (1995). The detection of gaze direction: A state-in-the-crowd effect. Perception, 24, 1297–1313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Vuilleumier, P. (2002). Facial expression and selective attention. Current Opinion In Psychiatry, 15, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watson, T. L., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2003). Pulling faces: An investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception, 32, 1109–1116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Webster, M. A., & MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647–653.Google Scholar
  43. Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557–561.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function. I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293–1313.Google Scholar
  45. Zhao, L., & Chubb, C. (2001). The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research, 41, 2979–2994.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zorzi, M., Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2003). Automatic spatial coding of perceived gaze direction is revealed by the Simon effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 423–429.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Faculty of LettersUniversity of TokyoBunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113–0033Japan
  2. 2.Department of Communication Sciences & DisordersHiroshima Prefectural College of Health SciencesMihara-City, Hiroshima 723–0053Japan
  3. 3.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesShizuoka Eiwa Gakuin UniversityShizuoka-City, Shizuoka 422–8005Japan

Personalised recommendations