Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 69, Issue 4, pp 272–284 | Cite as

Total retrieval time and hypermnesia: Investigating the benefits of multiple recall tests

  • Neil W. MulliganEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Hypermnesia is an increase in recall over repeated tests. A core issue is the role of repeated testing, per se, versus total retrieval time. Prior research implies an equivalence between multiple recall tests and a single test of equal total duration, but theoretical analyses indicate otherwise. Three experiments investigated this issue using various study materials (unrelated word lists, related word lists, and a short story). In the first experimental session, the study phase was followed by a series of short recall tests or by a single, long test of equal total duration. Two days later, participants took a final recall test. The multiple and single test conditions produced equivalent performance in the first session, but the multiple test group exhibited less forgetting and fewer item losses in the final test. In a fourth experiment, using a brief delay (15 min) between the recall sessions, the multiple recall condition produced greater hypermnesia as well as fewer item losses. In addition, final recall was significantly higher in the multiple than in the single test condition in three of the four experiments. Thus, single and repeated recall tests of equal total duration are not functionally equivalent, but rather produce differences observable in subsequent recall tests.

Keywords

Recall Test Retrieval Practice Final Recall Multiple Test Condition Item Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Cynthia Rodriguez, Chirene Boukkarroun, Sharon Chou, and Mike Steele.

References

  1. Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999). Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 608–629.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.Google Scholar
  3. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80 (3, Pt.2).Google Scholar
  4. Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 1: Memory in everyday life (pp. 396–401). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Bluck, S., Levine, L. J., & Laulhere, T. M. (1999). Autobiographical remembering and hypermnesia: A comparison of older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 14, 671–682.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bornstein, B. H., Liebel, L. M., & Scarberry, N. (1998). Repeated testing in eyewitness memory: A means to improve recall of a negative emotional event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S. C., Conover, J. N., Flores, L. M., & Goodman, K. (1991). Clustering and recall: Do high clusterers recall more than low clusterers because of clustering? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 710–721.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, K. M., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Maki, R. H. (2001). A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1314–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633–642.Google Scholar
  10. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505 (on-line Database available at http://www.psy.uwa.edu.au/MRCDataBase/uwa_mrc.htm).Google Scholar
  11. Cull, W. L., Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1996). Expanding understanding of the expanding-pattern-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 365–378.Google Scholar
  12. Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory: Handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 317–344). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. (1992). Examining the generality of eyewitness hypermnesia: A closer look at time delay and question type. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 643–657.Google Scholar
  14. Erdelyi, M. H. (1996). The recovery of unconscious memories: Hypermnesia and reminiscence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Erdelyi, M. H., & Kleinbard, J. (1978). Has Ebbinghaus decayed with time? The growth of recall (hypermnesia) over days. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 497–514.Google Scholar
  18. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 421–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  20. MacLeod, M. D., & Macrae, C. N. (2001). Gone but not forgotten: The transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 12, 148–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Madigan, S., & Lawrence, V. (1980). Factors affecting item recovery and hypermnesia. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 489–504.Google Scholar
  22. McDaniel, M. A., Moore, B. A., & Whiteman, H. L. (1998). Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: A relational/item-specific account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 173–185.Google Scholar
  23. Morris, P. E., & Fritz, C. O. (2000). The name game: Using retrieval practice to improve the learning of names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 124–129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mulligan, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 436–450.Google Scholar
  25. Mulligan, N. W. (2002). The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: Influences of semantic and non-semantic generation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Otani, H., & Griffith, J. (1998). Hypermnesia for prose. Journal of General Psychology, 125, 147–155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Otani, H., Widner, R. L., Whiteman, H. L., & St-Louis, J. P. (1999). Hypermnesia: The role of multiple retrieval cues. Memory & Cognition, 27, 928–934.Google Scholar
  28. Payne, D. G. (1986). Hypermnesia for pictures and words: Testing the recall level hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 16–29.Google Scholar
  29. Payne, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Payne, D. G., Anastasi, J. S., Blackwell, J. M., & Wenger, M. J. (1994). Selective disruption of hypermnesia for pictures and words. Memory & Cognition, 22, 542–551.Google Scholar
  31. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roediger, H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Hypermnesia: Improvements in recall with repeated testing. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Roediger, H. L., & Thorpe, L. A. (1978). The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia. Memory & Cognition, 6, 296–305.Google Scholar
  34. Roediger, H. L., Payne, D. G., Gillespie, G. L., & Lean, D. S. (1982). Hypermnesia as determined by level of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 635–655.Google Scholar
  35. Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & Goff, L. M. (1997). Recovery of true and false memories: Paradoxical effects of repeated testing. In M. A. Conway (Ed.), Recovered memories and false memories. Debates in psychology (pp. 118–149). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, R. J. (1992). Degree of learning, interpolated tests, and rate of forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 20, 621–632.Google Scholar
  38. Runquist, W. N. (1983). Some effects of remembering on forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 11, 641–650.Google Scholar
  39. Scrivner, E., & Safer, M. A. (1988). Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 371–377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaw, G. A., Bekerian, D. A. (1991) Hypermnesia for high-imagery words: The effects of interpolated tasks. Memory & Cognition, 19, 87–94.Google Scholar
  41. Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 260–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240–245.Google Scholar
  43. Widner, R. L., Otani, H., & Smith, A. D. (2000). Hypermnesia: Age-related differences between young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 28, 556–564.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations