Psychological Research

, Volume 69, Issue 1–2, pp 22–29 | Cite as

Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why?

Original Article

Abstract

Three experiments examined the recognition speed advantage for happy faces. The results replicated earlier findings by showing that positive (happy) facial expressions were recognized faster than negative (disgusted or sad) facial expressions (Experiments 1 and 2). In addition, the results showed that this effect was evident even when low-level physical differences between positive and negative faces were controlled by using schematic faces (Experiment 2), and that the effect was not attributable to an artifact arising from facilitated recognition of a single feature in the happy faces (up-turned mouth line, Experiment 3). Together, these results suggest that the happy face advantage may reflect a higher-level asymmetry in the recognition and categorization of emotionally positive and negative signals.

References

  1. Adolphs, R. (2002) Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: Psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1, 21–62.Google Scholar
  2. Billings, L. S., Harrison, D. W., & Alden, J. D. (1993). Age differences among women in the functional asymmetry for bias in facial affect perception. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 317–320.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, N. W., & Siddle, D. A. T. (1996). The preparedness account of social phobia: Some data and alternative explanations. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 291–316). London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Keane, J., & Dean, M. (2000). Configural information in facial expression perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 527–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.Google Scholar
  6. Crews, W. D., & Harrison, D. W. (1994). Cerebral asymmetry in facial affect perception by women: Neuropsychological effects of depressive mood. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1667–1679.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185.Google Scholar
  8. Ducci, L. (1981). Reaction times in the recognition of facial expressions of emotion. Italian Journal of Psychology, 8, 183–193.Google Scholar
  9. Ekman, P., & Davidson, R. J. (1993). Voluntary smiling changes regional brain activity. Psychological Science, 4, 342–335.Google Scholar
  10. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Esteves, F., & Öhman, A. (1993). Masking the face: Recognition of emotional facial expressions as a function of the parameters of backward masking. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34, 1–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C., & Thorpe, S. (2001). A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 171–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Feyereisen, P., Malet, C., & Martin, Y. (1986). Is the faster processing of expressions of happiness modality-specific? In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 349–355). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  15. Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotions: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition and Emotion, 14, 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank, M., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1993). Behavioral markers and recognizability of the smile of enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 83–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanaya, M. (1992). Perception of facial expressions: Effect of facial angle on emotion category effect. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 52, 33–36.Google Scholar
  18. Hansen, C.H., & Hansen, R.D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917–924.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison, D. W., Corelczenko, P. M., & Cook, J. (1990). Sex differences in the functional asymmetry for facial affect perception. International Journal of Neuroscience, 52, 11–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hess, U., Blairy, S., & Kleck, R. E. (1997). The intensity of emotional facial expressions and decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howell, D. C. (1987). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: PWS-Kent.Google Scholar
  22. Hugdahl, K., Iversen, P. M., & Johnsen, B. H. (1993). Laterality for facial expressions: Does the sex of the subjects interact with the sex of the stimulus face? Cortex, 29, 325–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston, P. J., Katsikitis, M., & Carr, V. J. (2001). A generalised deficit can account for problems in facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia. Biological Psychology, 58, 203–227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirita, T., & Endo, M. (1995). Happy face advantage in recognizing facial expressions. Acta Psychologica, 89, 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lehr, D. J., Bergum, B. O., & Standing, T. E. (1966). Response latency as a function of stimulus affect and presentation order. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1111–1116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Leppänen, J. M., & Hietanen, J. K. (in press). Affect and face perception: Odors modulate the recognition advantage of happy faces. Emotion.Google Scholar
  27. Lundqvist, D., Esteves, F., & Öhman, A. (1999). The face of wrath: Critical features for conveying facial threat. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 691–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Matlin, M. W., & Stang, D. J. (1978). The Pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman.Google Scholar
  30. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Osgood C. E., & Hoosain, R. (1983). Pollyanna II: Two types of negativity. The Journal of Psychology, 113, 151–160.Google Scholar
  34. Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33–60.Google Scholar
  35. Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stalans, L., & Wedding, D. (1985). Superiority of the left hemisphere in the recognition of emotional faces. International Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 219–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stanners, R. F., Byrd, D. M., & Gabriel, R. (1985). The time it takes to identify facial expressions: Effects of age, gender of subject, sex of sender, and type of expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 201–213.Google Scholar
  39. Stenberg, G., Wiking, S., & Dahl, M. (1998). Judging words at face value: Interference in word processing reveals automatic processing of affective facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 755–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1995). Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 901–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner, H. L. (1993). On measuring performance in category judgment studies of nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17, 3–28.Google Scholar
  43. White, M. (1995). Preattentive analysis of facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 439–460.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Information Processing LaboratoryDepartment of PsychologyUniversity of TampereFinland

Personalised recommendations