A molecular perspective on starch metabolism in woody tissues
The elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of starch synthesis and mobilization in perennial woody tissues is of the utmost scientific and agricultural importance.
Starch is the main carbohydrate reserve in plants and is fundamental in human nutrition and several industrial processes. In leaves, starch accumulated during the day is degraded throughout the night and the resulting sugars, glucose and maltose, are exported to the cytosol by the specialized transmembrane translocators pGT and MEX, respectively. Nevertheless, the degradation of the starch granule is a complex process not completely elucidated. While the mechanisms of starch mobilization during germination in the dead endosperm of cereal seeds are well described, the molecular and biochemical mechanisms involved in starch storage in the heterotrophic tissues of woody plants and its utilization in spring and winter are still puzzling. It is known that some biochemical steps of starch synthesis are conserved in heterotrophic tissues and in the leaves, but some aspects are particular to sink organs. From an agronomic standpoint, the knowledge on starch storage and mobilization in woody tissues is pivotal to understand (and to optimize) some common practices in the field that modify source–sink relationships, such as pruning and defoliation. Soluble sugars resulting from starch are also pivotal to cold adaptation, and in several fruits, such as banana and kiwifruit, starch may provide soluble sugars during ripening. In this review, we explore the recent advances on the molecular mechanisms and regulations involved in starch synthesis and mobilization, with a focus on perennial woody tissues.
KeywordsStarch metabolism Amyloplast Sugar transporter Woody tissues
The transition from hunter-gathering to sedentary agriculture, also called the “Neolithic revolution”, occurred in different locations around the world. This revolution, that preceded the development of large and complex civilizations, was characterized by the cultivation of starchy staples, such as cereals (Hillman et al. 2001; Gepts 2004; Tanno and Willcox 2006). Nowadays, starch-accumulating crops, besides remaining a major food source for humans, are widely used as animal feedstock and in several industrial processes, including paper, textile and pharmaceutical industries (Zeeman et al. 2010). Also, starch is the main source of carbon accumulation in fruits such as banana (Zhang et al. 2005) and kiwifruit (Nardozza et al. 2013), but is also present in considerable amounts during the development and ripening of fruits that mainly store soluble sugars, such as tomato (Bias et al. 2014), apple (Li et al. 2012), pear (Mesa et al. 2016) and strawberry (Moing et al. 2001). Starch in crops such as maize has also been used to produce bioethanol in an effort to increase the bio-sustainability of fuel production (Smith 2008).
Starch is composed of two polymers of glucose, amylopectin and amylose, with the same type of glucosidic linkages that differ in their length and degree of branching. Amylopectin consists of chains of α-1,4-linked glucose units, branched by α-1,6-linkages (Smith et al. 1997), and has evolved from the ancestral capacity to make glycogen, the storage polysaccharide of animals, fungi, and bacteria that is a polymer much more branched than amylopectin (Copeland et al. 2009; Zeeman et al. 2010). Amylose is smaller than amylopectin and a linear polymer with α -1,4-linked glucose units (Slattery et al. 2000). The granule is organized in a layered structure of concentric lamellae, generally called growth rings that correspond to periodic depositions of starch (Smith 2001). In the granule matrix, amylopectin forms the amorphous and crystalline lamellae and amylose is thought to be mainly present in the amorphous lamellae (Buléon et al. 1998).
While the biochemical pathways involved in the synthesis of transient starch in the chloroplast are relatively well known, some aspects of its metabolism still remain elusive. For instance, the biochemical mechanisms involved in starch accumulation in the heterotrophic tissues of woody plants and its subsequent utilization in spring, and in winter in response to low-temperature, are far from being understood. Furthermore, some of this knowledge is pivotal to understand and optimize common agricultural practices that modify source–sink relationships and impact the amount of carbohydrate reserves in heterotrophic tissues.
In this review, the topic of starch synthesis and mobilization in auto- and heterotrophic tissues is approached from a molecular perspective, paying special attention to current knowledge in perennial woody tissues.
Starch synthesis and mobilization in leaves
The degradation of the starch granule is a complex process that still is not completely elucidated (for a review see Zeeman et al. 2010; Andriotis et al. 2016a). In Arabidopsis, approximately 50% of carbon assimilated during the day is stored in the chloroplast in the form of starch, which is degraded during the night to feed the metabolism (Fig. 2; Zeeman and Rees 1999; Zeeman et al. 2007). β-amylases (BAM) hydrolyze the linear chains and release maltose from exposed non-reducing ends but are unable to hydrolyze amylopectin branching points, which are cleaved by debranching enzymes (DBE) (Zeeman et al. 2010). The role of BAM in starch degradation was elucidated in starch excess (sex) potato mutant where a plastidic BAM is downregulated (Scheidig et al. 2002). Furthermore, in Arabidopsis thaliana, DBEs, isoamylase (ISA) and limit dextrinase (LDA), are also involved in starch degradation because isa3 and isa3/lda knock-out mutants display sex phenotypes. The role of α-amylases (AMY) in starch degradation in the leaves is still unclear and seems to vary between species. For instance, the Arabidopsis mutant amy3 does not display any sex phenotype (Yu et al. 2005) but rice α-amylase I-1 knock-out plants accumulate low levels of starch in the leaves (Asatsuma et al. 2005).
One important factor regulating starch degradation is the reversible phosphorylation of the glucans at the surface of the granule (Zeeman et al. 2010; MacNeill et al. 2017). The action of glucan, water dikinase (GWD) and phosphoglucan, water dikinase (PWD), which add phosphate groups from ATP to the glucosyl residues, and of phosphoglucan phosphatases, which remove the phosphate groups, allow the solubilization of the granule surface, facilitating the activity of the amylolytic enzymes. These enzymes are fundamental for starch degradation as shown in the Arabidopsis mutants sex1 (loss of GWD; Yu et al. 2001) and pwd (loss of PWD; Baunsgaard et al. 2005). Also, it has been shown that the removal of the phosphate groups, by SEX4 and LSF1 (like SEX FOUR), is necessary for complete starch degradation (Zeeman et al. 2010). For instance, the loss of AtSEX4 phosphatase reduces starch degradation in Arabidopsis leaves (Niittylä et al. 2006) and lsf1 mutants show a starch excess phenotype and reduced rates of starch degradation (Comparot-Moss et al. 2010).
The final products of starch degradation in the chloroplasts during the night are mainly maltose with some glucose (Weise et al. 2004) that must be exported to the cytosol to allow a continuous supply of carbon (Fig. 2). Maltose is exported to the cytosol by the plastidic maltose transporter (MEX; Niittylä et al. 2004), which was identified following the characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana maltose excess mutant that displays an increased accumulation of maltose in leaves during the night. Furthermore, evidence of glucose transport across the chloroplast envelope was obtained by Schäfer et al. (1977) several years before the identification of the plastidic glucose translocator (pGT) (Weber et al. 2000). In the cytosol, maltose and glucose are converted to sucrose, the most common carbohydrate for long-distance sugar transport.
Starch synthesis in sink tissues
ADP-glucopyrophosphorylase (AGPase) is present in both source and sink tissues and it is exclusively localized inside the plastid in all tissues except in the cereal endosperm, which despite possessing the plastic form most of its activity is cytosolic (Denyer et al. 1996; Burton et al. 2002). In cereals, adenosine diphosphate glucose (ADP-Glc) synthesized in the cytosol is translocated to the amyloplast by the inner envelope protein BT1 that, in maize, is encoded by the Brittle1 gene (Fig. 3; Denyer et al. 1996; Beckles et al. 2001). In maize endosperm, this protein transports cytosolic ADP-Glc into the plastid in exchange for ADP (Sullivan and Kaneko 1995; Möhlmann et al. 1997; Kirchberger et al. 2007). Interestingly, in potato (Leroch et al. 2005) and Arabidopsis (Kirchberger et al. 2008) the BT protein is involved in the efflux of adenine nucleotides synthesized in the plastids. Also, GUS assays showed that in Arabidopsis AtBT1 is mainly expressed in developing anthers, in the central cylinder of young roots and root tips (Kirchberger et al. 2008).
In cereal seeds α-amylase plays a pivotal role in starch mobilization
Starch mobilization in woody tissues in winter for cold tolerance and in spring for bud burst
During winter, the degradation of starch in woody tissues plays a crucial role in cold tolerance. The accumulation of sucrose and raffinose in response to cold stress has been described in several species, such as poplar (Sauter and van Cleve 1991, 1994), Pinus strobus L. (Hinesley et al. 1992), birch (Kasuga et al. 2007), and willow (Ögren 1999), which occurs concomitantly with the degradation of starch reserves (Sauter 1988; Witt and Sauter 1994a; Ögren 1999; Ashworth et al. 1993; Palonen et al. 2000). During spring, starch is mobilized to sustain plant growth, and in poplar woody tissues starch is completely hydrolyzed at the time of bud burst (Sauter and van Cleve 1994; Witt and Sauter 1994b).
Accordingly, an increase in the biochemical activity of starch-degrading enzymes has been reported in the period of starch–sugar conversion in woody tissues (Elle and Sauter 2000). The total amylolytic activity in poplar tissues is higher during the spring (Witt and Sauter 1994a) and autumn (Witt and Sauter 1994b), providing the carbon needed for sugar synthesis in the cytosol. Thus, sucrose or raffinose synthesis in the cytosol of woody tissues during cold adaptation and during spring depends of the transport of sugars from amyloplasts following starch breakdown. For instance, in Ajuga reptans, a species that accumulates large amounts of raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) and translocates stachyose, most of the enzymes involved in raffinose synthesis are localized in the cytosol (Bachmann and Keller 1995), and similar results were obtained in spinach and Arabidopsis leaves exposed to cold treatment (Schneider and Keller 2009). Interestingly, the chestnut CsDSP4, a homolog of the Arabidopsis SEX4 phosphatase associated with starch degradation in leaves (Zeeman and Rees 1999; Niittylä et al. 2006), is induced in woody tissues during autumn starch catabolism to promote the accumulation of sugars (Berrocal-Lobo et al. 2011). Also, an increase in the activity of sucrose phosphate synthase, a cytosolic enzyme that synthesizes sucrose-6-phosphate from UDP-glucose and fructose-6-phosphate (Ito et al. 2011), has been reported in several plant species in response to cold treatments (Guy et al. 1992; Holaday et al. 1992; Hurry et al. 1995).
Thus, considering that the amyloplast maintains its integrity during starch degradation in the winter and spring (Sauter and van Cleve 1990; Sauter and van Cleve 1991), it is very likely that this process is different from the one that occurs in cereal seeds but similar to the one described in leaves at night. Therefore, during periods of starch mobilization, the sugars released by amylolytic enzymes inside the amyloplast must be translocated into the cytosol by the action of specific plastidic membrane proteins. It is tempting to speculate that the proteins involved in sugar export from the chloroplast, such as MEX and pGT, could also play a role in transporting maltose and glucose from the amyloplast. In fact, it has been reported that a MEX from apple is expressed not only in autotrophic tissues but also in immature leaves, roots and fruits (Reidel et al. 2008), and in grapevine, VvMEX is expressed in several heterotrophic tissues such as berries, flowers and canes (Noronha et al. unpublished). Also, a pGT from rice is highly expressed in the seeds during development (Toyota et al. 2006) and in olive tree it was found that a pGT is expressed and localized in tissues that do not accumulate starch (Butowt et al. 2003), suggesting broader physiological roles for these proteins than previously thought. Still, numerous physiological aspects of starch storage in woody plants and of its metabolization in spring and during winter are far from being understood (Geisler-Lee et al. 2006).
Also, the root system of woody plants is an important site of starch accumulation and its interplay with stem reserves is not yet fully understood, particularly under stress conditions that limit photosynthesis, where these reserves could be used to provide energy and carbon to the plant (Loescher et al. 1990; Zapata et al. 2004; Dovis et al. 2014; Thalmann and Santelia 2017). In grapevine potted plants, it was shown that the remobilization of root starch supplies sugars to the fruits in response to drought stress (Rossouw et al. 2017).
Agronomical practices affect starch metabolism in woody plants
As shown above, in woody plants, each growing season merges with the previous and following ones through the carbohydrate reserves accumulated in woody tissues, making this topic of the outmost agronomical and scientific importance. In grapevine, delaying pruning after bud burst could deplete reserve carbohydrates and the reiteration of this practice may cause carry-over effects on vine vigor and yield (Moran et al. 2017; Petrie et al. 2017). Similarly, trunk girdling, a practice that limits phloem transport of photoassimilates to the roots while maintaining xylem water flow, affects the replenishment and mobilization of carbohydrate reserves (Roper and Williams 1989; Mei et al. 2015). Also, defoliation reduces the accumulation of carbohydrate reserves in woody organs, with early ones having the largest impact (Bennett et al. 2005; Smith and Holzapfel 2009; Zufferey et al. 2012). For example, in grapevine, source–sink ratio that may be decreased by partial defoliation or increased by cluster thinning, are normally associated with several modifications of vineyard efficiency and grape and wine quality. With the aim to decipher the underlying mechanisms, we have recently evaluated how the common agricultural practice of leaf removal may modulate at the molecular level the storage of starch in grapevine woody canes. Our results (Silva et al. 2017) showed that severe leaf removal promotes a consistent decrease in starch, sucrose and phenolics that accumulate in 1-year-old canes. At the molecular level, alterations of source–sink ratios resulted in a transcriptional adjustment of genes involved in starch metabolism, including and upregulation of VvGPT1 and VvNTT (plastidic ATP/ADP translocator) for higher cluster/leaf ratios (Silva et al. 2017). Recently, it was shown that under reduced water supply during berry ripening, starch remobilization from roots is concurrent with rapid berry sugar accumulation and intensified by defoliation (Rossouw et al. 2017). Manipulation of source–sink relationship by fruit thinning can contribute to maintain high levels of carbohydrate reserve in woody organs. In grapevine, fruit thinning at the onset of ripening increases total non-structural carbohydrate concentration in the roots in subsequent seasons (Smith and Holzapfel 2009). Furthermore, fertilization may have an impact in the accumulation of starch reserves, as mineral nitrogen (N) supply was shown to decrease non-structural carbohydrates in apple trees (Cheng and Fuchigami 2002). It has been reported that starch accumulated higher in woody tissues of apple trees growing in water culture without N supply and amylase, sucrose-6P synthase and sucrose synthase activities of wood and bark tissues were suppressed by N deprivation (Yoshioka et al. 1989).
Food scarcity due to an increase in the global population is a problem that is a challenge for scientists and policy makers, thus, unraveling the mechanisms of starch synthesis in both auto- and heterotrophic tissues is of the utmost scientific and societal importance. As shown in this review, several enzymes and plastidic proteins, such as MEX and pGT, modulate carbon allocation in plant tissues, but their role in starch mobilization in sink organs, such as woody tissues, deserves further investigation. Several experimental constrains, including the lack of model plants amenable for transformation and the absence of mutants, limit the study of these processes in woody tissues. Nevertheless, the advances that have been made in the understanding of starch metabolism in Arabidopsis and maize, together with the increasing availability of next-generation sequencing tools, will allow researchers to obtain a better picture of the molecular processes that occur in woody tissues.
Author contribution statement
HG and HN conceived the idea of the review and prepared the first draft. All authors added new information to the manuscript, read and approved the final version.
The work was supported by European Union Funds (INTERACT-NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000017-Linha VitalityWineON 0013) and Portuguese national funds (FCT-Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) under the Projects UID/AGR/04033/2013 and UID/BIA/04050/2013. HN was supported by postdoctoral grant from FCT (SFRH/BPD/115518/2016).
- Bennett J, Jarvis P, Creasy GL, Trought MCT (2005) Influence of defoliation on overwintering carbohydrate reserves, return bloom, and yield of mature Chardonnay grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 56:386–393Google Scholar
- Berrocal-Lobo M, Ibañez C, Acebo P, Ramos A, Perez-Solis E, Collada C, Casado R, Aragoncillo C, Allona I (2011) Identification of a homolog of Arabidopsis DSP4 (SEX4) in chestnut: its induction and accumulation in stem amyloplasts during winter or in response to the cold. Plant, Cell Environ 34:1693–1704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bias B, Bénard C, Beauvoit B, Colombié S, Prodhomme D, Ménard G, Bernillon S, Gehl B, Gautier H, Ballias P, Mazat JP, Sweetlove L, Génard M, Gibon Y (2014) Remarkable reproducibility of enzyme activity profiles in tomato fruits grown under contrasting environments provides a roadmap for studies of fruit metabolism. Plant Physiol 164:1204–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Comparot-Moss S, Kötting O, Stettler M, Edner C, Graf A, Weise SE, Streb S, Lue WL, MacLean D, Mahlow S, Ritte G, Steup M, Chen J, Zeeman SC, Smith AM (2010) A putative phosphatase, LSF1, is required for normal starch turnover in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 152:685–697CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Geisler-Lee J, Geisler M, Coutinho PM, Segerman B, Nishikubo N, Takahashi J, Aspeborg H, Djerbi S, Master E, Andersson-Gunnerås S, Sundberg B, Karpinski S, Teeri TT, Kleczkowski LA, Henrissat B, Mellerowicz EJ (2006) Poplar carbohydrate-active enzymes. Gene identification and expression analyses. Plant Physiol 140:946–962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gepts P (2004) Domestication as a long-term selection experiment. Plant Breed Rev 24:1–44Google Scholar
- Hinesley LE, Pharr DM, Snelling LK, Funderburk SR (1992) Foliar raffinose and sucrose in four conifer species: relationship to seasonal temperature. J Am Soc Hort Sci 117:852–855Google Scholar
- Lemoine R, La Camera S, Atanassova R, Dédaldéchamp F, Allario T, Portau N, Bonnemain JL, Laloi M, Coutos-Thévenot P, Maurousset L, Faucher M, Girousse C, Lemonnier P, Parrilla J, Durand M (2013) Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front Plant Sci: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loescher WH, McCamant Keller JD (1990) Carbohydrate reserves, translocation, and storage in woody plant roots. HortScience 25:274–281Google Scholar
- Möhlmann T, Tjaden J, Henrichs G, Quick WP, Häusler R, Neuhaus EH (1997) ADP-glucose drives starch synthesis in isolated maize endosperm amyloplasts: characterization of starch synthesis and transport properties across the amyloplast envelope. Biochem J 324:503–509CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Moing A, Renaud C, Gaudillere M, Raymond P, Roudeillac P, Denoyes-Rothan B (2001) Biochemical changes during fruit development of four strawberry cultivars. J. Am Soc Hort Sci 126:394–403Google Scholar
- Nardozza S, Boldhing HL, Osorio S, Höhne M, Wohlers M, Gleave AP, MacRae EA, Richardson AC, Atkinson RG, Sulpice R, Fernie AR, Clearwater MJ (2013) Metabolic analysis of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) berries from extreme genotypes reveals hallmarks for fruit starch metabolism. J Exp Bot 64:5049–5063CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Niewiadomski P, Knappe S, Geimer S, Fisher K, Schulz B, Unte US, Rosso MG, Ache P, Flügge U, Schneider A (2005) The Arabidopsis plastidic glucose 6-phosphate/phosphate translocator GPT1 is essential for pollen maturation and embryo sac development. Plant Cell 17:760–775CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Niittylä T, Comparot-Moss S, Lue WL, Messerli G, Trevisan M, Seymour MD, Gatehouse JA, Villadsen D, Smith SM, Chen J, Zeeman SC, Smith AM (2006) Similar protein phosphatases control starch metabolism in plants and glycogen metabolism in mammals. J Biol Chem 281:11815–11818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith JP, Holzapfel BP (2009) Cumulative responses of Semillon grapevines to late season perturbation of carbohydrate reserve status. Am J Enol Vitic 60:461–470Google Scholar
- Smith AM, Denyer K, Martin C (1997) The synthesis of the starch granule. Plant Mol Biol 48:67–87Google Scholar
- Yu TS, Kofler H, Häusler RE, Hille D, Flügge UI, Zeeman SC, Smith AM, Kossmann J, Lloyd J, Ritte G, Steup M, Lue WL, Chen J, Weber A (2001) The Arabidopsis sex1 mutant is defective in the R1 protein, a general regulator of starch degradation in plants, and not in the chloroplast hexose transporter. Plant Cell 13:1907–1918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Zufferey V, Murisier F, Vivin P, Belcher S, Lorenzini F, Spring JL, Viret O (2012) Carbohydrate reserves in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ‘Chasselas’): influence of leaf to fruit ratio. Vitis 51:102–110Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.