Multiple mechanism confers natural tolerance of three lilyturf species to glyphosate
- 453 Downloads
A combination of unique EPSPS structure and increased gene copy number and expression contribute to natural glyphosate tolerance in three lilyturf species.
A few plants are naturally tolerant to glyphosate, the most widely used non-selective herbicide worldwide. Here, the basis for natural tolerance to glyphosate in three lilyturf species, Ophiopogon japonicus (OJ), Liriope spicata (LS), and Liriope platyphylla (LP), is characterized. These species tolerate glyphosate at about five times the commercially recommended field dose. They share three unique amino acids in their 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) that affect glyphosate binding. These correspond to Asp71Met, Ala112Ile, and Val201Met amino acid variations compared to 231 other published plant EPSPS amino acid sequences. There was also a common deletion at 91 of a highly conserved glutamic acid. Glyphosate-treated lilyturf plants accumulated little shikimic acid but had significantly higher levels of EPSPS mRNA than initially expressed in the control. The IC50 of LsEPSPS was 14.0 µM compared to the 5.1 µM of Arabidopsis thaliana. The higher K m and K i values of LsEPSPS kinetics showed that LsEPSPS had lower substrate binding affinity to glyphosate. Overexpression of LsEPSPS in the recombinant E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain enhanced its tolerance to glyphosate. Both OJ and LS had two copies of the EPSPS gene, while LP had three copies. Therefore, a combination of unique EPSPS structure and increased gene copy number and expression contribute to natural glyphosate tolerance in the three lilyturf species.
KeywordsEPSPS gene Glyphosate Lilyturf Shikimic acid Tolerance mechanism
This research was financially supported by China Transgenic Organism Research and Commercialization Project (2014ZX08011), National Science and Technology Pillar Program (2012BAD19B02), and the 111 project. The authors thank Vijay K. Nandula and Franck Dayan (USDA, USA) for the helpful comments and the improvement of the manuscript. The authors, however, accept full responsibility for the results and their interpretation.
- Albany (2014) Global glyphosate market is expected to reach USD 8.79 Billion by 2019. Transparency Market Research. PRNewswire Publishers, New York, p 1Google Scholar
- Boerboom CM, Wyse DL, Somers DA (1990) Mechanism of glyphosate tolerance in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). Weed Sci 38:463–467Google Scholar
- Cromartie TH, Polge ND (2000) An improved assay for shikimic acid and its use as a monitor for the activity of sulfosate. Proc Weed Sci Soc Am 40:291Google Scholar
- DeGennaro FP, Weller SC (1984) Differential susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate. Weed Sci 32:472–476Google Scholar
- Eichholtz DA, Alan D, Gasser CS, Scott C, Kishore GM, Murthy G (2001) Modified gene encoding glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthase. United States Patent No. 6,225,114Google Scholar
- Gaines TA, Zhang WL, Wang DF, Bukun B, Chisholm ST, Shaner DL, Nissena SJ, Patzoldt WL, Tranel PJ, Culpepper AS, Grey TL, Webster TM, Vencill WK, Sammons RD, Jiang J, Preston C, Leach JE, Westra P (2010) Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:1029–1034PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heap IM (2015) International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/. Accessed 10 April 2015
- Jasieniuk M, Ahmad R, Sherwood AM, Firestone JL, Perez-Jones A, Lanini WT, Mallory-Smith C, Stednick Z (2008) Glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in California: distribution, response to glyphosate, and molecular evidence for an altered target enzyme. Weed Sci 56:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jugulam M, Niehues K, Godar AS, Koo DH, Danilova T, Friebe B, Sehgal S, Varanasi VK, Wiersma A, Westra P, Stahlman PW, Gill BS (2014) Tandem amplification of a chromosomal segment harboring 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase locus confers glyphosate resistance in Kochia scoparia. Plant Physiol 166:1200–1207PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kahrizi D, Salmanian A, Afshari A, Moieni A, Mousavi A (2007) Simultaneous substitution of Gly96 to Ala and Ala183 to Thr in 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase gene of E. coli (k12) and transformation of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in order to make tolerance to glyphosate. Plant Cell Rep 26:95–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lattier J, Ranney T, Fantz PR, Avent T (2014) Identification, nomenclature, genome sizes, and ploidy levels of Liriope and Ophiopogon Taxa. HortSci 49:145–151Google Scholar
- Robertson RR (2010) Physiological and biochemical characterization of glyphosate resistant Ambrosia trifida L. MS Thesis, Purdue UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Singh BK, Shaner DL (1998) Rapid determination of glyphosate injury to plants and identification of glyphosate-resistant plants. Weed Technol 12:527–530Google Scholar
- Van Hoogmoed J, Gilliam CH, Wehtje GR, Knight PR, Foshee WG, Olive JW, Murphy AM (2013) Effects of repeated applications of Roundup Pro® over the top of container-grown nursery crops. J Environ Hort 31:234–240Google Scholar
- Yuan CI, Chen YM, Chaing MY (2001) Responses of Dicliptera chinensis to glyphosate. Plant Prot Bull Taiwan 43:29–38Google Scholar
- Zhang M, Liu Y, Zhang CX, Wei SH, Huang HJ (2011) Glyphosate-tolerant mechanisms in field bindweed Convolvulus arvensis. Acta Phytophylacica Sin 38:551–556Google Scholar
- Zhou ZH, Huang LH, Jiang X, Li YQ, Zhang XW (2009) Cloning and prokaryotic expression of EPSP synthase gene cDNA of Allium macrostemon Bunge. Sci Agr Sin 42:2297–2304Google Scholar