Advertisement

Planta

, Volume 241, Issue 6, pp 1509–1518 | Cite as

Lunar gravity affects leaf movement of Arabidopsis thaliana in the International Space Station

  • Joachim FisahnEmail author
  • Emile Klingelé
  • Peter Barlow
Original Article

Abstract

Main conclusion

Cyclic leaf ascent and descent occur in synchrony and phase congruence with the lunisolar tidal force under a broad range of conditions.

Digitized records of the vertical leaf movements of Arabidopsis thaliana were collected under space flight conditions in the International Space Station (ISS). Oscillations of leaf movements with periods of 45 and 90 min were found under light-adapted conditions, whereas in darkness, the periods were 45, 90, and 135 min. To demonstrate the close relationship between these oscillations and cyclical variations of the lunisolar gravitational force, we estimated the oscillations of the in-orbit lunisolar tide as they apply to the ISS, with the aid of the Etide software application. In general, in-orbit lunisolar gravitational profiles exhibited a periodicity of 45 min. Alignment of these in-orbit oscillations with the oscillations of Arabidopsis leaf movement revealed high degrees of synchrony and a congruence of phase. These data corroborate previous results which suggested a correlative relationship and a possible causal link between leaf movement rhythms obtained on ground and the rhythmic variation of the lunisolar tidal force.

Keywords

Circadian clock Etide Lunisolar Zeitgeber 

Abbreviations

ISS

International Space Station

EMCS

European Modular Cultivation System

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Anders Johnsson (Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway), Dr. Bjarte Solheim (Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway), and Prof. Dr. Tor-Henning Iversen (Department of Biology, The Plant BioCentre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway) for providing additional results and details of the conditions in the ISS during the in-orbit experiments, for reading the manuscript and providing valuable comments. We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Nima Yazdanbakhsh for critical discussion of the described experiments. Special thanks to Prof. Dr. em. Enno Brinckmann for providing valuable further details on the construction of the EMCS.

Conflict of interest

We declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Barlow P, Fisahn J (2012) Lunisolar tidal force and the growth of plant roots, and some other of its effects on plant movements. Ann Bot 110:301–318CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow PW, Klingelé E, Klein G, Mikulecký M Sr (2008) Leaf movements of bean plants and lunar gravity. Plant Signal Behav 3:1083–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow PW, Mikulecký M Sr, Střeštík J (2010) Tree-stem diameter fluctuates with the lunar tides and perhaps with geomagnetic activity. Protoplasma 247:25–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinckmann E (2005) ESA hardware for plant research on the International Space Station. Adv Space Res 36:1162–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinckmann E, Brillouet C (2000) Space plant research on the ISS with the European Modular Cultivation System and with BIOLAB. SAE Tech Pap Ser Paper No. 2000-01-2472Google Scholar
  6. Crossley D, Hinderer J, Boy JP (2005) Time variations of the European gravity field from superconducting gravimeters. Geophys J Int 161:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Mairan J (1729) Observation botanique. Hist Acad Roy Sci (Paris) 1729:35–36Google Scholar
  8. Dodd AN, Parkinson K, Webb AAR (2004) Independent circadian regulation of assimilation and stomatal conductance in the ztl-1 mutant of Arabidopsis. New Phytol 162:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorda G (2010) Quantisierte Zeit und die Vereinheitlichung von Gravitation und Elektromagnetismus. Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen Germany. ISBN-10: 3869552409. http://www.cuvillier.de/flycms/de/html/30/-UickI3zKPS7xcE0=/Buchdetails.html
  10. Dornbusch T, Michaud O, Xenarios I, Fankhauser C (2014) Differentially phased leaf growth and movements in Arabidopsis depend on coordinated circadian and light regulation. Plant Cell 26:3911–3921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Engelmann W, Simon K, Phen CJ (1992) Leaf movement rhythm in Arabidopsis thaliana. Z Naturforsch 47:925–928Google Scholar
  12. Fisahn J, Yazdanbakhsh N, Klingelé E, Barlow PW (2012) Arabidopsis thaliana root growth kinetics and lunisolar tidal acceleration. New Phytol 195:346–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Flügel A (1949) Die Gesetzmässigkeiten der endogenen Tagesrhythmik. Planta 37:337–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fossum K, Kittang AI, Iversen T-H, Brinckmann E, Schiller P (2005) Testing the European Modular Cultivation System (EMCS) for ISS plant and cell research. In: International conference on environmental systems, Rome, ITALY. SAE Technical Paper Series 2005-01-2841Google Scholar
  15. Harmer SL (2009) The circadian system in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:357–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hennessey TL, Field CB (1992) Evidence of multiple circadian oscillators in bean plants. J Biol Rhyth 7:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hernandez MP, Arambarri AM (2010) Stomatal distribution, stomatal density and daily leaf movement in Acacia aroma (Leguminosae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 45:273–284Google Scholar
  18. Johnsson A, Solheim BGB, Iversen T-H (2009) Gravity amplifies and microgravity decreases circumnutations in Arabidopsis thaliana stems: results from a space experiment. New Phytol 182:621–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinoshita T, Ono N, Hayashi Y, Morimoto S, Nakamura S, Soda M, Kato Y, Ohnishi M, Nakano T, Inoue S, Shimazaki K (2011) FLOWERING LOCUS T regulates stomatal opening. Curr Biol 21:1232–1238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Klein G (2007) Farewell to the internal clock. A contribution in the field of chronobiology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Konopliv AS, Binder AB, Hood LL, Kucinskas AB, Sjogren L, Williams JG (1998) Improved gravity field of the moon from Lunar Prospector. Science 281:1476–1480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Konopliv AS, Asmar SW, Carranza E, Sjogren WL, Yuan DN (2001) Recent gravity models as a result of the Lunar Prospector mission. Icarus 150:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lasceve G, Leymarie J, Vavasseur A (1997) Alterations in light-induced stomatal opening in a starch deficient mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana L. deficient in chloroplast phosphoglucomutase activity. Plant, Cell Environ 20:350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Longman IM (1959) Formulas for computing the tidal accelerations due to the moon and the sun. J Geophys Res 64:2351–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lüttge U (2003) Circadian rhythmicity: Is the “biological clock” hardware or software? Prog Bot 64:277–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayer W-E (1981) Energy-dependent phases of the circadian clock and the clock-controlled leaf movements of Phaseolus coccineus L. Planta 152:292–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Moran N (2007) Osmoregulation of leaf motor cells. FEBS Lett 581:2337–2347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Paul AL, Zupanska AK, Ostrow DT, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Li JL, Shanker S, Farmerie WG, Amalfitano CF, Ferl RJ (2012) Spaceflight transcriptomes: unique responses to a novel environment. Astrobiology 12:40–56CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Paul AL, Zupanska AK, Schultz ER, Ferl RJ (2013) Organ-specific remodeling of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in response to spaceflight. BMC Plant Biol 13:112CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rascher U, Hütt MT, Siebke K, Osmond B, Beck F, Lüttge U (2001) Spatiotemporal variation of metabolism in a plant circadian rhythm: the biological clock as an assembly of coupled individual oscillators. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98:11801–11805CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rauf M, Arif M, Fisahn J, Xue G-P, Balazadeh S, Mueller-Roeber B (2013) NAC transcription factor speedy hyponastic growth regulates flooding-induced leaf movement in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25:4941–4955CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Roenneberg T, Morse D (1993) Two circadian oscillators in one cell. Nature 362:362–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosa LM, Dillenbur LR, Irwin N, Forseth IN (1991) Responses of soybean leaf angle, photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to leaf and soil water potential. Ann Bot 67:51–58Google Scholar
  34. Solheim BGB, Kittang AI, Iversen T-H, Johnsson A (2006) Preparatory experiments for long-term observation of Arabidopsis circumnutations in microgravity. Acta Astronaut 59:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Solheim BGB, Johnsson A, Iversen T-H (2009) Ultradian rhythms in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves in microgravity. New Phytol 183:1043–1052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Somers DE, Schultz TF, Milnamow M, Kay SA (2000) ZEITLUPE encodes a novel clock-associated PAS protein from Arabidopsis. Cell 101:319–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sweeney BM (1969) Rhythmic phenomena in plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Uehlein N, Kaldenhoff R (2008) Aquaporins and plant leaf movements. Ann Bot 101:1–4CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu J, Sun H, Ducarme BA (2004) A global experimental model for gravity tides of the Earth. J Geodynamics 38:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zürcher E, Cantiani M-G, Sorbetti Guerri F, Michel D (1998) Tree stem diameters fluctuate with tide. Nature 392:665–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant PhysiologyPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Geodesy and PhotogrammetryETH-HönggerbergZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations