Emerging technologies for non-invasive quantification of physiological oxygen transport in plants
- 633 Downloads
Oxygen plays a critical role in plant metabolism, stress response/signaling, and adaptation to environmental changes (Lambers and Colmer, Plant Soil 274:7–15, 2005; Pitzschke et al., Antioxid Redox Signal 8:1757–1764, 2006; Van Breusegem et al., Plant Sci 161:405–414, 2001). Reactive oxygen species (ROS), by-products of various metabolic pathways in which oxygen is a key molecule, are produced during adaptation responses to environmental stress. While much is known about plant adaptation to stress (e.g., detoxifying enzymes, antioxidant production), the link between ROS metabolism, O2 transport, and stress response mechanisms is unknown. Thus, non-invasive technologies for measuring O2 are critical for understanding the link between physiological O2 transport and ROS signaling. New non-invasive technologies allow real-time measurement of O2 at the single cell and even organelle levels. This review briefly summarizes currently available (i.e., mainstream) technologies for measuring O2 and then introduces emerging technologies for measuring O2. Advanced techniques that provide the ability to non-invasively (i.e., non-destructively) measure O2 are highlighted. In the near future, these non-invasive sensors will facilitate novel experimentation that will allow plant physiologists to ask new hypothesis-driven research questions aimed at improving our understanding of physiological O2 transport.
KeywordsOxygen Reactive oxygen species Sensor Non-invasive
The authors also acknowledge the UF Excellence Award and the IFAS Early Career Award (CRIS No. 005062) for funding (McLamore). A special thanks to PIKL (Baltimore, MD) for help with graphic images.
- Alimohammadi M, Xu Y, Wang D, Biris AS, Khodakovskaya MV (2011) Physiological responses induced in tomato plants by a two-component nanostructural system composed of carbon nanotubes conjugated with quantum dots and its in vivo multimodal detection. Nanotechnology 22(29):295101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bewley JD (1994) Seeds: physiology of development and germination. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Etxeberria E, Gonzalez P, Baroja-Fernandez E, Romero JP (2006) Fluid phase endocytic uptake of artificial nano-spheres and fluorescent quantum dots by sycamore cultured cells: evidence for the distribution of solutes to different intracellular compartments. Plant Signal Behav 1:196–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McEvoy AK, Von Bültzingslöwen C, McDonagh C, MacCraith BD, Klimant I, Wolfbeis OS (2003) Optical sensors for application in intelligent food packaging technology. Proc SPIE (The Society of Optical Engineering) 4876:806–815Google Scholar
- Serrano M, Robatzek S, Torres M, Kombrink E, Somssich IE, Robinson M, Schulze-Lefert P (2007) Chemical interference of pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immune responses in Arabidopsis reveals a potential role for fatty-acid synthase type ii complex-derived lipid signals. J Biol Chem 282:6803–6811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sud D, Zhong W, Mycek M (2005) Measurement of intracellular oxygen levels using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). In: Licha K, Cubeddu R (eds) Photon migration and diffuse-light imaging II, vol 5859. Proc SPIEGoogle Scholar
- Tschiersch H, Liebsch G, Stangelmayer A, Borisjuk L, Rolletschek H (2011) Planar oxygen sensors for non invasive imaging in experimental biology, microsensors. In: Minin I (ed). InTech. doi: 10.5772/17893, ISBN: 978-953-307-170-1
- Xu H, Buck SM, Kopelman R, Philbert MA, Brasuel M, Monson E, Behrend C, Ross B, Rehemtulla A, Koo Y-EL (2005) Fluorescent PEBBLE nanosensors and nanoexplorers for real-time intracellular and biomedical applications. In: Geddes CD, Lakowicz JR (eds) Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Vol. 10, Academic/Plenum Press, pp 69–126Google Scholar