Signal cross talk in Arabidopsis exposed to cadmium, silicon, and Botrytis cinerea
The role of defence gene expression triggered by Cd toxicity in the plant’s response to Botrytis cinerea was investigated in Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia 0. Silicon (0 or 1.5 mM) and Cd (0, 1 or 10 μM) were supplied to 3-month-old solution-cultured plants. After 3 days, half of the plants of each treatment were inoculated with Botrytis. Supplied Cd concentrations were below the toxicity threshold and did not cause shoot growth inhibition or evidence of oxidative stress, while Botrytis infection severely decreased plant growth in all treatments. The expression of marker genes PR1 and BGL2 for the salicylic acid (SA) and the PDF1.2 for the jasmonic acid–ethylene (JA–ET) signalling pathways was enhanced in 10 μM Cd-treated non-infected plants. Twenty hours after inoculation, PDF1.2 expression showed a strong increase in all treatments, while enhanced PR1, BGL2, and CHIB expression was only found 7 days after infection. A great synergistic effect of Cd and Botrytis on PDF1.2 expression was found in 10 μM Cd-treated plants. Silicon decreased PR1, BGL2, and CHIB, while increasing PDF1.2 expression, which indicates its role as a modulator of the signalling pathways involved in the plant’s response to fungal infection. Botrytis growth decreased in 10 μM Cd-treated plants, which could be due to the combined effects of Cd and Botrytis activating the SA and JA–ET-mediated signalling pathways. Taken together, our results provide support for the view that Cd concentrations close to the toxicity threshold induce defence signalling pathways which potentiate the plant’s response against fungal infection.
KeywordsEthylene-dependent signalling pathways Jasmonate-dependent signalling pathways Salicylate-dependent signalling pathways
Plant defensin 1.2
Vegetative Storage Protein gene 2
This work was supported by the Spanish Government (project BFU2010-14873). The predoctoral grant PIF from UAB to Berta Gallego is gratefully acknowledged.
- Epstein E (1972) Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jost R, Altschmied L, Bloem E, Bogs J, Gershenzon J, Hahnel U, Hansch R, Hartmann T, Kopriva S, Kruse C, Mendel RR, Papenbrock J, Reichelt M, Rennenberg H, Schnug E, Schmidt A, Textor S, Tokuhisa J, Wachter A, Wirtz M, Rausch T, Hell R (2005) Expression profiling of metabolic genes in response to methyl jasmonate reveals regulation of genes of primary and secondary sulfur-related pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynth Res 86:491–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lichthenthaler HK, Wellburn A (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 11:591–592Google Scholar
- Poschenrieder C, Cabot C, Tolrà R, Llugany M, Martos S, Gallego B, Barceló J (2011) Metal defense against biotic stress; is it real? Agrochimica 55:29–44Google Scholar
- Wu J, Zhao F-J, Ghandilyan A, Logoteta B, Olortegui Guzman M, Schat H, Wang X, Aarts MGM (2009) Identification and functional analysis of two ZIP metal transporters of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Soil 325:79–95Google Scholar
- Wu HL, Chen CL, Du J, Liu H, Cui Y, Zhang Y, He YJ, Wang YQ, Chu CC, Feng ZY, Li JM, Ling HQ (2012) Co-overexpression FIT with AtbHLH38 or AtbHLH39 in Arabidopsis-enhanced cadmium tolerance via increased cadmium sequestration in roots and improved iron homeostasis of shoots. Plant Physiol 158:790–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar