, Volume 226, Issue 2, pp 405–416 | Cite as

Pollen tube growth: coping with mechanical obstacles involves the cytoskeleton

Original Article


Cellular growth and movement require both the control of direction and the physical capacity to generate forces. In animal cells directional control and growth forces are generated by the polymerization of and traction between the elements of the cytoskeleton. Whether actual forces generated by the cytoskeleton play a role in plant cell growth is largely unknown as the interplay between turgor and cell wall is considered to be the predominant structural feature in plant cell morphogenesis. We investigated the mechano-structural role of the cytoskeleton in the invasive growth of pollen tubes. These cells elongate rapidly by tip growth and have the ability to penetrate the stigmatic and stylar tissues in order to drill their way to the ovule. We used agents interfering with cytoskeletal functioning, latrunculin B and oryzalin, in combination with mechanical in vitro assays. While microtubule degradation had no significant effect on the pollen tubes’ capacity to invade a mechanical obstacle, latrunculin B decreased the pollen tubes’ ability to elongate in stiffened growth medium and to penetrate an obstacle. On the other hand, the ability to maintain a certain growth direction in vitro was affected by the degradation of microtubules but not actin filaments. To find out whether both cytoskeletal elements share functions or interact we used both drugs in combination resulting in a dramatic synergistic response. Fluorescent labeling revealed that the integrity of the microtubule cytoskeleton depends on the presence of actin filaments. In contrast, actin filaments seemed independent of the configuration of microtubules.


Actin Invasive growth Microtubules Pollen tube Tip growth 


  1. Bartnicki-Garcia S, Bracker CE, Gierz G, Lopez-Franco R, Lu HS (2000) Mapping the growth of fungal hyphae: orthogonal cell wall expansion during tip growth and the role of turgor. Biophys J 79:2382–2390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benkert R, Obermeyer G, Bentrup FW (1997) The turgor pressure of growing lily pollen tubes. Protoplasma 198:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bibikova TN, Blancaflor EB, Gilroy S (1999) Microtubules regulate tip growth and orientation in root hairs of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 17:657–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewbaker J, Kwack B (1963) The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 50:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai G, Romagnoli S, Cresti M (2001) Microtubule motor proteins and the organization of the pollen tube cytoplasm. Sex Plant Reprod 14:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen CY, Wong EI, Vidali L, Estavillo A, Hepler PK, Wu HM, Cheung AY (2002) The regulation of actin organization by actin-depolymerizing factor in elongating pollen tubes. Plant Cell 14:2175–2190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collings DA, Lill AW, Himmelspach R, Wasteneys GO (2006) Hypersensitivity to cytoskeletal antagonists demonstrates microtubule-microfilament cross-talk in the control of root elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 170:275–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geitmann A (1999) The rheological properties of the pollen tube cell wall. In: Cresti M, Cai G, Moscatelli A (eds) Fertilization in higher plants: molecular and cytological aspects. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 283–302Google Scholar
  9. Geitmann A, Cresti M (1996) The role of the cytoskeleton and dictyosome activity in the pulsatory growth of Nicotiana tabacum and Petunia hybrida pollen tubes. Bot Acta 109:102–109Google Scholar
  10. Geitmann A, Emons AMC (2000) The cytoskeleton in plant and fungal cell tip growth. J Microsc 198:218–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geitmann A, Parre E (2004) The local cytomechanical properties of growing pollen tubes correspond to the axial distribution of structural cellular elements. Sex Plant Reprod 17:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbon BC, Kovar DR, Staiger CJ (1999) Latrunculin B has different effects on pollen germination and tube growth. Plant Cell 11:2349–2363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenberg JT (1996) Programmed cell death: a way of life for plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:12094–12097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harold RL, Money NP, Harold FM (1996) Growth and morphogenesis in Saprolegnia ferax: is turgor required? Protoplasma 191:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heath IB, Steinberg G (1999) Mechanisms of hyphal tip growth: tube dwelling amebae revisited. Fungal Genet Biol 28:79–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hiscock SJ, Dewey FM, Coleman JOD, Dickinson HG (1994) Identification and localization of an active cutinase in the pollen of Brassica napus L. Planta 193:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Justus CD, Anderhag P, Goins JL, Lazzaro MD (2004) Microtubules and microfilaments coordinate to direct a fountain streaming pattern in elongating conifer pollen tube tips. Planta 219:103–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaminskyj SGW, Garrill A, Brent Heath I (1992) The relation between turgor and tip growth in Saprolegnia ferax: turgor is necessary, but not sufficient to explain apical extension rates. Exp Mycol 16:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ketelaar T, de Ruijter NCA, Emons AMC (2003) Unstable F-actin specifies the area and microtubule direction of cell expansion in Arabidopsis root hairs. Plant Cell 15:285–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laitiainen E, Nieminen KM, Vihinen H, Raudaskoski M (2002) Movement of generative cell and vegetative nucleus in tobacco pollen tubes is dependent on microtubule cytoskeleton but independent of the synthesis of callose plugs. Sex Plant Reprod 15:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lovy-Wheeler A, Wilsen KL, Baskin TI, Hepler PK (2005) Enhanced fixation reveals the apical cortical fringe of actin filaments as a consistent feature of the pollen tube. Planta 221:95–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Money NP (1997) Wishful thinking of turgor revisited: the mechanics of fungal growth. Fungal Genet Biol 21:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Money NP (1998) Mechanics of invasive fungal growth and the significance of turgor in plant infection. In: Kohmoto K, Yoder OC (eds) Molecular genetics of host-specific toxins in plant disease. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 261–271Google Scholar
  24. Parre E, Geitmann A (2005a) More than a leak sealant. The mechanical properties of callose in pollen tubes. Plant Physiol 137:274–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parre E, Geitmann A (2005b) Pectin and the role of the physical properties of the cell wall in pollen tube growth of Solanum chacoense. Planta 220:582–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pickett-Heaps JD, Klein AG (1998) Tip growth in plant cells may be amoeboid and not generated by turgor pressure. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:1453–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raudaskoski M, Astrom H, Laitiainen E (2001) Pollen tube cytoskeleton: structure and function. J Plant Growth Regul 20:113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez OC, Schaefer AW, Mandato CA, Forscher P, Bement WM, Waterman-Storer CM (2003) Conserved microtubule–actin interactions in cell movement and morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 5:599–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schubert T, Akopian A (2004) Actin filaments regulate voltage-gated ion channels in salamander retinal ganglion cells. Neuroscience 125:583–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaw SL, Dumais J, Long SR (2000) Cell surface expansion in polarly growing root hairs of Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 124:959–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor LP, Hepler PK (1997) Pollen germination and tube growth. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:461–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Bruaene N, Joss G, Van Oostveldt P (2004) Reorganization and in vivo dynamics of microtubules during arabidopsis root hair development. Plant Physiol 136:3905–3919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vidali L, McKenna ST, Hepler PK (2001) Actin polymerization is essential for pollen tube growth. Mol Biol Cell 12:2534–2545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang H, Wu HM, Cheung AY (1996) Pollination induces mRNA poly(A) tail-shortening and cell deterioration in flower transmitting tissue. Plant J 9:715–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut de recherche en biologie végétale, Département de sciences biologiquesUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations