, Volume 220, Issue 5, pp 794–803

Nitrogen uptake in relation to excess supply and its effects on the lichens Evernia prunastri (L.) Ach and Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr.

  • Gisela Gaio-Oliveira
  • Lena Dahlman
  • Kristin Palmqvist
  • Maria Amélia Martins-Loução
  • Cristina Máguas
Original Article


The aim of this study was to compare the physiological responses to increased nitrogen (N) supply between the nitrophytic lichen Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr. and the acidophytic lichen Evernia prunastri (L.) Ach. The two lichens were exposed to a weekly dosage of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.6 or 2.4 g N m−2 for 2 months, administered as NH4NO3 dissolved in artificial rainwater (1 l m−2). After the treatments, in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence was determined to assess vitality; concentrations of total N, ammonium, nitrate and dominant amino acids, including glutamate, glutamine and arginine, were quantified in order to follow changes in N status; and the polyols ribitol, arabitol and mannitol were quantified to follow changes in the lichens’ carbon (C) status. The uptake of N was quantified by labelling the fertiliser with 15N in the ammonium position; chlorophyll a was used as an indirect marker for algal activity, and ergosterol as an indirect marker of fungal activity. Nitrogen uptake was higher in E. prunastri than in X. parietina, although the latter species may have used the mannitol reserves to obtain C skeletons and energy for N assimilation. Chlorophyll a and ergosterol concentrations remained unaltered in X. parietina irrespective of N dosage while ergosterol decreased with increasing N uptake in E. prunastri. The latter species had accumulated a large pool of ammonium at the highest N dosage, whilst in X. parietina a significant nitrate pool was instead observed. Taken together, these short-term responses to high N supply observed in the two lichens, and the differences between them, can partly explain the higher tolerance of X. parietina towards increased atmospheric N levels.


Ammonium Evernia Nitrate Nitrogen assimilation Nitrogen uptake Xanthoria 





Dry weight






  1. Boonpragob K, Nash III TH, Fox CA (1989) Seasonal deposition patterns of acidic ions and ammonium to the lichen Ramalina menziesii Tayl. in southern California. Environ Exp Bot 29:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown DH, Avalos A, Miller JE, Bargagli R (1994) Interactions of lichens with their mineral environment. Crypt Bot 4:135–142Google Scholar
  3. Crittenden PD (1996) The effect of oxygen deprivation on inorganic nitrogen uptake in an antarctic macrolichen. Lichenologist 28:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahlman L, Zetherström M, Sundberg B, Näsholm T, Palmqvist K (2001) Measuring ergosterol and chitin in lichens. In: Kranner I, Beckett RP, Varma AK (eds) Protocols in lichenology. Culturing, biochemistry, ecophysiology and use in biomonitoring. Lab Manuals. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 348–362Google Scholar
  5. Dahlman L, Näsholm T, Palmqvist K (2002) Growth, nitrogen uptake, and resource allocation in the two tripartite lichens Nephroma arcticum and Peltigera aphthosa during nitrogen stress. New Phytol 153:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlman L, Persson J, Näsholm T, Palmqvist K (2003) Carbon and nitrogen distribution in the green algal lichens Hypogymnia physodes and Platismatia glauca in relation to nutrient supply. Planta 217:41–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahlman L, Persson J, Palmqvist K, Näsholm T (2004) Organic and inorganic nitrogen uptake in lichens. Planta 219:459–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. De Bakker AJ (1989) Effects of ammonia emission on epiphytic lichen vegetation. Acta Bot Neerl 38:337–342Google Scholar
  9. Eriksson O, Winka K (1998) Families and higher taxa of Ascomycota. Myconet 1:17–24Google Scholar
  10. Fahselt D (1994) Carbon metabolism in lichens. Symbiosis 17:127–182Google Scholar
  11. Feige GB, Jensen M (1992) Basic carbon and nitrogen metabolism of lichens. In: Reisser W (ed) Algae and symbioses: plants, animals, fungi, viruses, interactions explored. Biopress, Bristol, pp 277–299Google Scholar
  12. Gaio-Oliveira G, Branquinho C, Máguas C, Martins-Loução MA (2001) The concentration of nitrogen in nitrophilous and non-nitrophilous lichen species. Symbiosis 31:187–199Google Scholar
  13. Gaio-Oliveira G, Dahlman L, Palmqvist K, Máguas C (2004) Ammonium uptake in the nitrophytic lichen Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr. and its effects on vitality and balance between symbionts. Lichenologist 36:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galun M (1988) Recognition in fungus alga interaction in lichens. Phytoparasitica 16:190–190Google Scholar
  15. Gries C (1996) Lichens as indicators of air pollution. In: Nash III TH (ed) Lichen biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 240–254Google Scholar
  16. Honegger R (1991) Functional aspects of the lichen symbiosis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42:553–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyvärinen M, Crittenden PD (1998) Relationships between atmospheric nitrogen inputs and the vertical nitrogen and phosphorus concentration gradients in the lichen Cladonia portentosa. New Phytol 140:519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lines CEM, Ratcliffe RG, Rees TAV, Southon TE (1989) A 13C NMR study of photosynthate transport and metabolism in the lichen Xanthoria calcicola Oxner. New Phytol 91:93–101Google Scholar
  19. MacKenzie TDB, MacDonald TM, Dubois LA, Campbell DA (2001) Seasonal changes in temperature and light drive acclimation of photosynthetic physiology and macromolecular content in Lobaria pulmonaria. Planta 214:57–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Martins-Loução MA, Cruz C (1999) The role of N source on carbon balance. In: Srivastava HS, Singh RP (eds) Modes of nitrogen nutrition in higher plants. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi, pp 231–282Google Scholar
  21. Millar AH, Day DA, Mathieu C (2002) Nitric oxide synthesis by plants and its potential impact on nitrogen and respiratory metabolism. In: Foyer C, Noctor G (eds) Photosynthetic nitrogen assimilation and associated carbon and respiratory metabolism. Kluwer, London, pp 193–204Google Scholar
  22. Miller JE, Brown DH (1999) Studies of ammonia uptake and loss by lichens. Lichenologist 31:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ninnemann H, Maier J (1996) Indications for the occurrence of nitric oxide synthases in fungi and plants and the involvement in photoconidiation of Neurospora crassa. Photochem Photobiol 64:393–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmqvist K (2000) Carbon economy in lichens. Tansley review No. 117. New Phytol 148:11–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmqvist K, Sundberg B (2001) Characterising photosynthesis and respiration in freshly isolated or cultured lichen photobionts. In: Kranner I, Beckett RP, Varma AK (eds) Protocols in lichenology. Culturing, biochemistry, ecophysiology and use in biomonitoring. Lab Manuals. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 152–181Google Scholar
  26. Palmqvist K, Campbell D, Ekblad A, Johansson H (1998) Photosynthetic capacity in relation to nitrogen content and its partitioning in lichens with different photobionts. Plant Cell Environ 21:361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Palmqvist K, Dahlman L, Valladares F, Tehler A, Sancho LG, Mattsson J-E (2002) CO2 exchange and thallus nitrogen across 75 contrasting lichen associations from different climate zones. Oecologia 133:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Poikolainen J, Lippo H, Hongisto M, Kubin E, Mikkola K, Lindgren M (1998) On the abundance of epiphytic green algae in relation to the nitrogen concentrations of biomonitors and nitrogen deposition in Finland. Environ Pollut 102:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rai AN (1988) Nitrogen metabolism. In: Galun M (ed) CRC handbook of lichenology, vol I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 201–237Google Scholar
  30. Rhine ED, Sims GK, Mulvaney RL, Pratt EJ (1998) Improving the Berthelot reaction for determining ammonium in soil extracts and water. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:473–480Google Scholar
  31. Richardson DHS (1985) The surface physiology of lichens with particular reference to carbohydrate transfer between the symbionts. In: Vicente C, Brown DH, Legaz ME (eds) Surface physiology of lichens. Universidad Complutense, Madrid, pp 25–55Google Scholar
  32. Ruoss E (1999) How agriculture affects lichen vegetation in central Switzerland. Lichenologist 31:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strengbom J, Nordin A, Näsholm T, Ericson L (2002) Parasitic fungus mediates change in nitrogen-exposed boreal forest vegetation. J Ecol 90:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sturgeon RJ (1985) Biosynthesis and utilisation of storage sugars in algae, fungi, and lichens. Physiol Veg 23:95–106Google Scholar
  35. Søchting U (1995) Lichens as monitors of nitrogen deposition. Crypt Bot 5:264–269Google Scholar
  36. Tamm CO (1953) Growth, yield and nutrition in carpets of a forest moss (Hylocomium splendens). Medd Statens Skogsforskningsinst Swed 43:1–140Google Scholar
  37. Tschermak-Woess E (1988) The algal partner. In: Galun M (ed) CRC handbook of lichenology, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 39–94Google Scholar
  38. Turpin DH (1991) Effects of inorganic N availability on algal photosynthesis and carbon metabolism. J Phycol 27:14–20Google Scholar
  39. Van Dobben HF (1996) Decline and recovery of epiphytic lichens in an agricultural area in The Netherlands (1900–1988). Nova Hedw 62:477–485Google Scholar
  40. Van Dobben HF, De Bakker AJ (1996) Re-mapping epiphytic lichen biodiversity in The Netherlands: effects of decreasing SO2 and increasing NH3. Acta Bot Neerl 45:55–71Google Scholar
  41. Van Dobben HF, Ter Braak CJF (1998) Effects of atmospheric NH3 on epiphytic lichens in The Netherlands: the pitfalls of biological monitoring. Atm Environ 32:551–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Herk CM (1999) Mapping of ammonia pollution with epiphytic lichens in the Netherlands. Lichenologist 31:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Herk CM (2001) Bark pH and susceptibility to toxic air pollutants as independent causes of change in epiphytic lichen composition in space and time. Lichenologist 33:419–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang JE, Skogley EO, Schaff BE, Kim JJ (1998) A simple spectrophotometric determination of nitrate in water, resin and soil extracts. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:1108–1115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gisela Gaio-Oliveira
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lena Dahlman
    • 2
  • Kristin Palmqvist
    • 2
  • Maria Amélia Martins-Loução
    • 1
  • Cristina Máguas
    • 1
  1. 1.CEBV—Centre for Ecology and Plant Biology, Departamento de Biologia VegetalFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations