Advertisement

Planta

, Volume 220, Issue 2, pp 230–240 | Cite as

Developmental analyses reveal early arrests of the spore-bearing parts of reproductive organs in unisexual flowers of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

  • Su-Lan Bai
  • Yi-Ben Peng
  • Ji-Xin Cui
  • Hai-Tao Gu
  • Li-Yun Xu
  • Yi-Qin Li
  • Zhi-Hong Xu
  • Shu-Nong BaiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

To understand the regulatory mechanisms governing unisexual flower development in cucumber, we conducted a systematic morphogenetic analysis of male and female flower development, examined the dynamic changes in expression of the C-class floral organ identity gene CUM1, and assessed the extent of DNA damage in inappropriate carpels of male flowers. Accordingly, based on the occurrence of distinct morphological events, we divided the floral development into 12 stages ranging from floral meristem initiation to anthesis. As a result of our investigation we found that the arrest of stamen development in female flowers, which occurs just after the differentiation between the anther and filament, is mainly restricted to the primordial anther, and that it is coincident with down-regulation of CUM1 gene expression. In contrast, the arrest of carpel development in the male flowers occurs prior to the differentiation between the stigma and ovary, given that no indication of ovary differentiation was observed even though CUM1 gene expression remained detectable throughout the development of the stigma-like structures. Although the male and female reproductive organs have distinctive characteristics in terms of organ differentiation, there are two common features regarding organ arrest. The first is that the arrest of the inappropriate organ does not affect the entirety of the organ uniformly but occurs only in portions of the organs. The second feature is that all the arrested portions in both reproductive organs are spore-bearing parts.

Keywords

Cucumis CUM1 gene expression Unisexual flower development 

Abbreviations

SEM

Scanning electron microscopy

TEM

Transmission electron microscopy

TUNEL

TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms Min Chen at the University of Arizona, USA, for her pilot work on the cucumber morphogenesis in this laboratory; Dr. Yu-Jin Hao at the National Institute of Fruit Tree Science, Japan, for his involvement in discussion of the implication of the putative critical point in cucumber unisexual flower development; Prof. C.X. He of the Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, CAAS for his help in growing plants; Prof. Xiansheng Zhang of Shangdong Agricultural University for his gift of the CUM1 gene as a probe; Prof. Zheng Meng and Wen-Liang Lu for their help in the establishment of the in situ technique in our laboratory; Profs. T.H. Tsao and S.Y. Hu of PKU, Prof. Z.R. Sung of UC Berkeley, Prof. H. Ma of Penn State University and Prof. V. Irish of Yale University for their critical reading of the manuscript; This work was supported by grants to S-N.B. from MST (J00-A-005, G19990116), NSFC (30070361), and to Z-H.X from MST.

References

  1. Ainsworth CC, Crossley S, Buchanan-Wollaston V Thangavelu M, Parker J (1995) Male and female flower in the dioecious plant sorrel show different pattern of MADS box genes expression. Plant Cell 7:1583–1598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atsmon D, Galun E (1960) A morphogenetic study of staminate, pistillate and hermaphrodite flowers in Cucumis sativus L. Phytomorphology 10:110–115Google Scholar
  3. Buzgo M, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Ma H (2004) Toward a comprehensive integration of morphological and genetic studies of floral development. Trends Plant Sci 9:164–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Calderon-Urrea A, Dellaporta SL (1999) Cell death and cell protection genes determine the fate of pistils in maize. Development 30:1463–1464Google Scholar
  5. Caňas LA, Busscher M, Angenent GC, Beltran JP, Van Tunen AJ (1994) Nuclear localization of the petunia MADS box protein FBP1. Plant J 6:597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caporali E, Carboni A, Calli MG, Rossi G, Spada A, Lono GPM (1994) Development of male and female flowers in Asparagus officinalis. Search for point of transition from hermaphroditic to unisexual developmental pathway. Sex Plant Reprod 7:239–249Google Scholar
  7. Caporali E, Spada A, Marziani G, Failla O, Scienza A (2003) The arrest of development of abortive reproductive organs in the unisexual flower of Vitis vinifera ssp. Silvestris. Sex Plant Reprod 15:291–300Google Scholar
  8. Cheng PC, Greyson RI, Walden DB (1983) Organ initiation and the development unisexual flowers in the tassel and ear of Zea mays. Am J Bot 70:450–462Google Scholar
  9. Dellaporta SL, Calderon-Urrea A (1993) Sex determination in flowering plants. Plant Cell 5:1241–1251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dominguez F, Moreno J, Cejudo FJ (2001) The nucellus degenerates by a process of programmed cell death during the early stages of wheat grain development. Planta 213:352–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Farbos I, Oliveira M, Negrutiu I, Mouras A (1997) Sex organ determination and differentiation in the dioecious plant Melandrium album (Silene latifolia): a cytological and histological analysis. Sex Plant Reprod 10:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galun E, Jung Y, Lang A (1963) Morphogenesis of floral buds of cucumber cultured in vitro. Dev Biol 6:370–387Google Scholar
  13. Goffinet MC (1990) Comparative ontogeny of male and female flowers of Cucumis sativus. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C (eds) Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 288–304Google Scholar
  14. Hao YJ, Wang DH, Peng YB, Bai SL, Xu LY, Li YQ, Xu ZH, Bai SN (2003) DNA damage in the early primordial anther is closely correlated with stamen arrest in the female flower of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Planta 217:888–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kater MM, Franken J, Carney KJ, Colombo L, Angenent GC (2001) Sex determination in the monoecious species cucumber is confined to specific floral whorls. Plant Cell 13:481–493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li QZ, Li XG, Sun JQ, Zhang XS (2000) Isolation and expression of an Agamous homolog in the flower of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Dev Reprod Biol 9:69–76Google Scholar
  17. Perl-Treves R (1999) Male to female conversion along the cucumber shoot: approaches to studying sex genes and floral development in Cucumis sativus. In: Ainsworth CC (ed) Sex determination in plants. Bios, Oxford, pp 189–286Google Scholar
  18. Wilson WR, Owens JN (2003) Histology of sterile male and female cones in Pinus monticola (western white pine) Sex Plant Reprod 15:301–310Google Scholar
  19. Yang LL, Chen M, Liu FQ, Geng Y, Chen C, Li YQ, Cao CH, Xu ZH, Bai SN (1999) Carpel of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) male flowers maintains early primordia characteristics during organ development. Chin Sci Bull 44:2509–2513Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Su-Lan Bai
    • 1
  • Yi-Ben Peng
    • 1
  • Ji-Xin Cui
    • 1
  • Hai-Tao Gu
    • 1
  • Li-Yun Xu
    • 1
  • Yi-Qin Li
    • 2
  • Zhi-Hong Xu
    • 1
  • Shu-Nong Bai
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.PKU–Yale Joint Research Center of Agricultural and Plant Molecular Biology, National Key Laboratory of Protein Engineering and Plant Gene Engineering, College of Life SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences and BiotechnologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations