Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology

, Volume 461, Issue 1, pp 177–189 | Cite as

The GPR55 agonist lysophosphatidylinositol acts as an intracellular messenger and bidirectionally modulates Ca2+-activated large-conductance K+ channels in endothelial cells

  • Alexander I. Bondarenko
  • Rolland Malli
  • Wolfgang F. GraierEmail author
Open Access
Signaling and Cell Physiology


Lysophospholipids are known to serve as intra- and extracellular messengers affecting many physiological processes. Lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI), which is produced in endothelial cells, acts as an endogenous agonist of the orphan receptor, G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55). Stimulation of GPR55 by LPI evokes an intracellular Ca2+ rise in several cell types including endothelial cells. In this study, we investigated additional direct, receptor-independent effects of LPI on endothelial large-conductance Ca2+ and voltage-gated potassium (BKCa) channels. Electrophysiological experiments in the inside-out configuration revealed that LPI directly affects the BKCa channel gating properties. This effect of LPI strictly depended on the presence of Ca2+ and was concentration-dependent, reversible, and dual in nature. The modulating effects of LPI on endothelial BKCa channels correlated with their initial open probability (Po): stimulation at low Po (<0.3) and inhibition at high Po levels (>0.3). In the whole-cell configuration, LPI in the pipette facilitated membrane hyperpolarization in response to low (0.1–2 μM) histamine concentrations. In contrast, LPI counteracted membrane hyperpolarization in response to supramaximal cell stimulation with histamine. These results highlight a novel receptor-independent and direct bidirectional modulation of BKCa channels by LPI on endothelial cells. We conclude that LPI via this mechanism serves as an important modulator of endothelial electrical responses to cell stimulation.


BKCa channel Cytosolic free Ca2+ elevation Endothelial cells Hyperpolarization Membrane potential Lipid mediators Lysophosphatidylinositol 


Lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI) belongs to the class of lysophospholipids and is generated by phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis via the action of the Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A2 [2, 27] and Ca2+-independent phospholipase A1 [27, 45]. LPI has been found to contribute to many physiological and pathophysiological processes including reproduction, angiogenesis, cell proliferation, apoptosis, inflammation, cardiovascular, and autoimmune diseases [6, 10, 25]. Because of the discovery that LPI serves as a putative endogenous agonist of the orphan receptor G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) [24, 32, 33, 42], which leads to mobilization of intracellular Ca2+, LPI recently received particular attention. Moreover, LPI was shown to stimulate non-selective cation channels and inhibit the Na+/K+ ATPase [4] GPR55-independently pointing to LPI as a putative vascular mediator.

An increase in intracellular free Ca2+ concentration represents a hallmark in endothelial cell physiology. Subsequently to the rise in cytosolic Ca2+, Ca2+-dependent K+ channels (KCa) become activated [8, 9, 20] that they play a pivotal role in the regulation of vascular tone. In vascular smooth muscle cells, stimulation of large-conductance Ca2+ and voltage-gated potassium (BKCa) channels counteracts depolarization during myogenic tone development, thus, limiting voltage-dependent Ca2+ entry and counteracting vasoconstriction. In endothelial cells, the stimulation of KCa contributes to vasodilatation by membrane hyperpolarization that increases the driving force for Ca2+ entry through non-voltage-gated Ca2+ channels that subsequently yields Ca2+-dependent formation of vasodilators, such like nitric oxide [18, 19, 30] or endothelial-derived hyperpolarizing factors [5, 16].

So far, stimulatory effects of LPI on BKCa and intermediate conductance KCa channels were reported to depend on the ability of LPI to mobilize internal Ca2+ [12, 38, 43]. However, recently several endogenous phospholipids, such like phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate or sphingosine-1-phosphate, have been shown to activate BKCa [26, 40] as well as TRPC channels [14] directly. Thus, the actual effects of LPI on vascular BKCa channels ought to be investigated in order to gain the understanding of the physiological potential of this putative inter- and intravascular mediator.

Accordingly, in order to explore potential direct effects of LPI on endothelial BKCa channels that lack the regulatory β-subunit [34], the effects of LPI were explored in excised membrane patches from human endothelial cells. We report herein that LPI directly modifies BKCa channel activity in a dual manner by either potentiating or inhibiting native BKCa channels at lower and higher basal activity of the channel, respectively. Altogether, our data indicate that LPI, besides its activity on GPR55, also exhibits receptor-independent effects, thus, pointing to LPI as a versatile messenger in the vasculature.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The human umbilical vein-derived endothelial cell line, EA.hy926 [11], at passage >45, was grown in DMEM containing 10% FCS and 1% HAT (5 mM hypoxanthine, 20 μM aminopterin, 0.8 mM thymidine) and were maintained in an incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. For experiments, cells were plated on glass coverslips.

Patch clamp recordings

Single-channel recordings were obtained from excised inside-out membrane patches in symmetrical solutions using the patch clamp technique. The pipettes were filled with (in millimolar) 140 KCl, 10 HEPES, 1 MgCl2, 5 EGTA, 4,931 CaCl2 with pH 7.2 by adding KOH (i.e., 10 μM free Ca2+, calculated by CaBuf from G. Droogmans, Leuven, Belgium; Cells were perfused with a bath solution containing (in millimolar) 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, 2.4 CaCl2. Following gigaseal formation, bath solution was switched to the following (in millimolar) 140 KCl, 10 HEPES, 1 MgCl2, 5 EGTA, and a desired free Ca2+ concentration which was adjusted by adding different amounts of CaCl2 calculated by the program CaBuf; pH was adjusted to 7.1 by adding KOH.

For whole-cell recordings, the pipette solution contained (in millimolar) 100 K-aspartate, 40 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 5 EGTA, and a free [Ca2+] was adjusted to 100 nM by adding 1,924 CaCl2 calculated by the program CaBuf. Recordings were performed in high Na+ solution stated above. Patch pipettes were pulled from glass capillaries using a Narishige puller (Narishige Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), fire-polished, and had a resistance of 3–5 MΩ for whole-cell recordings and 5–7 MΩ for single-channel recordings. Currents were recorded using a patch clamp amplifier (EPC7, List Electronics, Darmstadt, Germany) at a bandwidth of 3 kHz. The signals obtained were low pass filtered at 1 kHz using an eight-pole Bessel filter (Frequency Devices) and digitized with a sample rate of 10 kHz using a Digidata 1200A A/D converter (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA). Data collection and analysis were performed using Clampex and Clampfit software of pClamp (V9.0, Axon Instruments). Single-channel activity was obtained from >20 s of continuous recording under each experimental condition. The mean open time (to) in multichannel patches was calculated from the relationship \( {\hbox{to}} = \frac{{{\text{NPo}} \times T}}{{\# o}} \), where #o is the number of openings during a given time period of observation (T) [40].


Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and statistical significance was evaluated using Scheffé's post hoc F test of the Prism 5 software for Windows (GraphPad Software, Avenida de la Playa, CA USA). Level of significance was defined as P < 0.05.


LPI directly affects the BKCa channel activity by shortening the channel closed time

To investigate whether LPI has a direct effect on BKCa channels, the action of LPI on BKCa channel activity was investigated in the inside-out configuration in the presence of physiological levels of Ca2+ and Mg2+, the two metal ligands that affect gating of BKCa channels. Figure 1a illustrates BKCa single-channel activities recorded in excised patches in the presence of 0.1 (top panel) and 0.3 μM free Ca2+ (middle panel), as well as in the nominal absence of bath Ca2+ (lower panel), prior (left panels) and after addition of 3 μM LPI (right panels) to the bath at a holding potential of +40 mV. In the presence of bath Ca2+, LPI increased the NPo values of given BKCa channel of the patch by ~2.8-fold, while LPI was ineffective to stimulate BKCa channels in the absence of free Ca2+ in the bath (Fig. 1b). Because the stimulatory effects of LPI were observed after patch excision in Ca2+-containing solution, it is tempting to suggest that the action of LPI on BKCa channels occurs due to a direct interaction of LPI with the channels or some closely associated entities but not via the generation of a cytosolic second messenger.
Fig. 1

Ca2+ is required for the direct modulation of BK channel activity by LPI. a Representative single-channel recordings in inside-out patch (patch potential = +40 mV) exposed to 0.1 (top panels) and 0.3 μM (middle panels) Ca2+ prior (control) and after addition of 3 μM LPI to the cytosolic side of the patch. Channel openings are shown as upward deflections (c, closed, o, open). In the absence of Ca2+, LPI has no effect on BKCa channel activity (lower panels). b Summary data for the effect of 3 μM LPI on BKCa channel activity in the absence (0 mM Ca2+; n = 6) and presence of 0.1 (n = 10) and 0.3 μM (n = 21) free Ca2+ in the bath. *p < 0.05 vs. basal NPo in the absence of LPI.

The increase in NPo upon LPI addition was sustained (Fig. 2a) and reversible, following a 15-min washout (Fig. 2b). In addition, the stimulatory effect of LPI on BKCa channels was concentration-dependent (Fig. 2c, d). Due to a loss of the gigaseal, we were not able to explore the effect of LPI on BKCa channel activities at concentrations higher than 10 μM LPI. Notably, the LPI concentrations tested are within the range that are described to be found in humans under physiological/pathological conditions [10, 44] and are well below the critical micellar concentration (~75 μM; [13]).
Fig. 2

The LPI effect develops slowly, is sustained, reversible, and occurs in a concentration-dependent manner. a Representative single-channel recording in inside-out patch exposed to 10 μM LPI in the presence of 0.3 μM bath Ca2+ holding potential (Vm) = −40 mV. Channel openings are shown as downward deflections. b The reversibility of the effect of LPI effect is demonstrated by this representative single-channel recording in inside-out patch exposed to 0.3 μM Ca2+ prior (top, control), during (middle), and 15 min after exposure to 10 mM LPI (Vm = −40 mV). c Representative single-channel recording in inside-out patch exposed to 0.3 μM Ca2+ showing concentration-dependent activation of BKCa channel activity in response to bath application of 1, 3, and 10 μM LPI. Channel openings are shown as downward deflections (c, closed, o, open state). d Statistical representation of the effect of 1 (n = 6), 3 (n = 7), and 10 μM (n = 4) LPI on BKCa channels in the presence of 0.3 μM Ca2+ at Vm = −40 mV. *p < 0.05 vs. basal NPo in the absence of LPI

In order to characterize the effect of LPI in more detail, experiments with patches with only one active channel were performed. The existence of just one active BKCa channel in the respective patches was determined by applying 10 μM Ca2+ solution at the end of the experiments at a holding potential of +80 mV. From these experiments, we found that LPI increased the channel Po, while the single-channel amplitude remained unchanged (Fig. 3a). Moreover, the mean open time was moderately increased by LPI (Fig. 3b), while LPI strongly attenuated the mean closed time by ~77% reflecting an increase in opening frequency (Fig. 3c), thus indicating that the increase in Po by LPI is mainly due to a shortening of the closed time rather than a prolongation of the channel open time.
Fig. 3

LPI-evoked increase in BKCa channel activity is mainly due to a marked decrease in mean closed time. a Representative single-channel recording in inside-out patch containing one active channel exposed to 0.3 μM Ca2+ prior (control) and during exposure to 3 μM LPI at the cytosolic side of the patch (Vm = 40 mV). Channel openings are shown as upward deflections (c, closed, o, open states). b The mean open time of the BKCa prior (control) and after addition of 3 μM LPI (n = 12). c The mean closed time (frequency of openings) of the BKCa prior (control) and after addition of LPI (n = 12). *p < 0.05 vs. control

LPI dually modulates BKCa channels depending on the basal channel activity

Because Ca2+ is required for the stimulatory action of LPI, LPI may act via an increase in the apparent Ca2+ sensitivity of the BKCa channel. Thus, the effect of LPI on BKCa channel activity was studied in the presence of various Ca2+ concentrations in the bath. Interestingly, depending on the bath Ca2+ concentration, LPI exhibited opposite effects on the activity of the BKCa channels. In particular, under conditions of low Ca2+ in the bath solution (i.e., 0.1 and 0.3 μM free Ca2+), which were associated with basal Po lower than 0.3, the addition of 3 μM LPI augmented BKCa channel activity (Fig. 4a). In contrast, at high Ca2+ concentrations in the bath (i.e., 1 and 10 μM) that yielded elevated basal BKCa activity, LPI decreased the activity of the BKCa channel (Fig. 4a). This inhibitory effect of LPI was observed both in multichannel patches (Fig. 4b) and patches containing one active channel (Fig. 4c), and occurred in a concentration-dependent manner. This concentration-dependent inhibitory effect of LPI was in a similar range than that for the activation properties of LPI (Fig. 4d). Dwell time analysis of experiments performed in single-channel patches revealed that upon LPI exposure, the mean open time slightly decreased by 16 ± 10% (Fig. 4e), while the mean closed time strongly increased by 168 ± 82% (Fig. 4f). The decrease in (N)Po upon LPI under conditions of high bath Ca2+ is due to a pronounced increase in the mean closed time (a decrease in the frequency of openings) and a small decrease in the mean open time.
Fig. 4

The dual effect of LPI on BKCa channel activity. a Effect of 3 μM LPI on BKCa channel activity at different bath Ca2+ concentrations that correspond to basal (0.1 μM; n = 10), moderately (0.3 μM; n = 21), strong (1 μM; n = 20), and maximally (10 μM; n = 20) elevated cytosolic Ca2+ levels. *p < 0.05 vs. basal NPo in the absence of LPI. b Representative single-channel recordings from multichannel patch exposed to 1 μM Ca2+ at Vm = +40 mV with high basal NPo showing inhibitory effect of 3 μM LPI on BKCa channel activity. Channel openings are shown as upward deflections (c, closed; o, open state). Right panel: statistical representation of Po values before (control) and after addition of 3 μM LPI in patches exposed to 1 μM Ca2+ at Vm = ±40 mV and responded by a decrease in BKCa channel activity. c Representative single-channel recording in inside-out patch containing one active channel with the basal Po = 0.57 showing inhibitory effect of 3 μM LPI on BKCa channel activity. The patch was exposed to 1 μM Ca2+ at Vm = +40 mV. d Summary data of the concentration-dependency of the inhibitory effect of LPI on BKCa channel activity in patches exposed to 1 μM Ca2+ at Vm = +40 mV (n = 6–21) *p < 0.05 vs. control. The respective mean open time (e; n = 6, *p < 0.05) and the mean closed time (f; n = 6, *p < 0.05) of the BKCa channel prior (control) and after addition of 3 μM LPI (Vm = +40 to +60 mV). Data collected from patches exposed to 1 and 10 μM Ca2+ were pooled. g Correlation between the LPI-evoked alterations in BKCa channel activity (expressed as the ratio of NPo values in the presence and absence of 3 μM LPI) and basal Po values at Vm = +40 mV. Data points were obtained in the presence of 0.1, 0.3, 1, and 10 μM Ca2+

We hypothesized that these striking differences of the response of BKCa channel activity to LPI is due to the variability of the basal Po values. If this is the case, the basal Po levels should correlate with the degree of changes in BKCa channel activities caused by LPI. Plotting NPo responses against the basal Po values of BKCa channels in patches exposed to various bath Ca2+ concentration at a holding potential of +40 mV (Fig. 4g) revealed a clear inverse correlation between these two parameters (r 2 = 0.77). This finding indicates that the overall effect of LPI indeed depends on the basal Po level and thus on the basal activities of BKCa channels. Particularly, these data specify that for BKCa channels with a basal Po higher than 0.3 LPI exhibits an inhibitory action, while at a lower basal activity of the channels, LPI yields a stimulation of BKCa channel activity.

Because dual sensitivities to Ca2+ and transmembrane voltage are key features of BKCa channels, we next studied whether LPI affects the voltage-dependency of BKCa channels. In single-channel recordings, the stepwise elevation of the holding potential from 20 to 80 mV considerably increased the BKCa channel activity (Fig. 5a, left panels). This increase was further potentiated by 3 μM LPI at every potential tested (Fig. 5a, right panels). In terms of channel-opening characteristics at different voltages, LPI slightly affected the mean open time of the BKCa channels (Fig. 5c), while the channel's mean closed time was strongly reduced by LPI (Fig. 5d). These experiments suggest that voltage dependency of the BKCa channels is barely affected by LPI.
Fig. 5

Effect of LPI on voltage-sensitivity of BKCa channel. a The activity of BKCa channels prior (left) and after (right) bath application of 3 μM LPI. The patch was exposed to 1 μM Ca2+. Unitary currents were recorded at different membrane potentials as indicated. Upward deflections are the opening events of the channel (c, closed, o, open state). b Correlation of the effect of 3 μM LPI on the channels Po expressed as percent of control with the actual holding potential. The relationship between the mean open time (c) and mean closed time (d) of the channel with the actual holding potential in the absence (control) and presence of LPI (3 μM). Data presented are representative data and experiments were repeated four times with different patches that provided similar results

Furthermore, weak voltage-dependent effect of LPI was observed in experiments depicted in Fig. 6 and was performed in the presence of a given Ca2+ concentration of 10 μM. At negative voltages (i.e., −60 and −40 mV), when the channel activity was low (NPo = 0.173 at −60 mV and 0.282 at −40 mV, Fig. 6a), LPI equally increased NPo values (2.7- and 2.5-fold, respectively) (Fig. 6b, c). However, at positive voltages (i.e., +40 and Vm = +60 mV) that were associated with high basal activity of the channel (NPo levels of 1.23 at +40 mV and 1.27 at +60 mV), LPI equally decreased the channel activity by ~29% and 28%, respectively (Fig. 6b, c). Altogether, these data indicate that LPI modifies BKCa channel activity mainly through modulating Ca2+ sensitivity of the BKCa channels, and the effect of LPI strictly depends on the actual state of the activity of these channels.
Fig. 6

The dual effect of LPI depends on the level of basal BKCa channel activity. a Representative single-channel recording in inside-out patch exposed to a single Ca2+ concentration of 10 μM at different voltages. LPI (3 μM) increases NPo at negative voltages (Vm = −40 and Vm = −60 mV) and decreases NPo at positive voltages (Vm = +40 and Vm = +60 mV), where NPo is high (c, closed, o, open state). b Graphical representation of the dual effect of LPI at different voltages in the same patch. c Graphical representation showing Po values in the absence (control) and presence of 3 μM LPI at different voltages in the same patch

Intracellular LPI dually modifies endothelial electrical responses to histamine

Because LPI dually modifies BKCa channel activities in excised patches in a Ca2+-dependent manner, we next explored the physiological relevance of these findings by testing the impact of physiologically reported LPI concentrations (i.e., from 0.1 to 10 μM; [44]) on endothelial electrical responses to histamine in conventional whole-cell recordings. Because in the endothelial cell type used for this study, histamine-induced hyperpolarization is partially underpinned by an activation of BKCa channels [15], the effect of 0.1 or 1.0 μM LPI in the patch pipette on membrane hyperpolarization in response to various moderate histamine concentrations was tested. Histamine evoked membrane hyperpolarization of endothelial cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 7a, d). Under control conditions (no LPI in pipette) consecutive applications of 0.1, 0.5, and 2.0 μM histamine produced hyperpolarizing responses of 10.5 ± 2.1 mV (n = 19), 19.8 ± 2.3 mV (n = 16), and 24.8 ± 4.4 (n = 7) from the mean resting membrane potential of −33.8 ± 1.7 mV (n = 19) (Fig. 7d). In the presence of 0.1 or 1.0 μM LPI in the pipette, the resting membrane potential was not affected compared with control conditions (−32.0 ± 2.0 mV (n = 12) and −32.4 ± 1.6 (n = 8), respectively). However, when 0.1 and 1.0 μM LPI was present in the pipette, the amplitude of cell hyperpolarization in response to low histamine concentrations increased (Fig. 7b–d). To provide a link between increased endothelial hyperpolarization to low histamine concentrations in the presence of intacellular LPI and stimulatory effect of LPI on BKCa channels, paired experiments were conducted in the presence and absence of iberiotoxin, a selective inhibitor of BKCa channels. In the absence of intrapipette LPI, iberiotoxin (100 nM) slightly but significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the peak amplitude to 0.5 and 2 μM histamine from 23.5 ± 3.3 to 20.9 ± 2.7 (n = 8) and from 28.5 ± 3.0 to 25.4 ± 3.3 mV (n = 8), respectively. In the presence of intrapipette LPI (1 μM), iberiotoxin (100 nM) slightly but significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the peak amplitude to 0.5 and 2 μM histamine (Fig. 7e, f) from 29.4 ± 2.8 to 24.9 ± 2.9 mV (n = 7) and from 34.9 ± 2.2 to 29.4 ± 1.5 mV (n = 11), respectively. Remarkably, iberiotoxin failed to completely inhibit the stimulatory effect of LPI on endothelial hyperpolarization to 0.5 and 2 μM histamine (Fig. 7f), which might be due to direct LPI effect on ion channels other then BKCa. Nevertheless, these experiments clearly indicate that stimulatory effect of intracellular LPI on endothelial hyperpolarization to 0.5 and 2 μM histamine is partially attributed to stimulation of BKCa channels. These results confirm our findings in excised patches and indicate that LPI increases the sensitivity of endothelial cells to submicromolar concentrations of histamine by facilitating the Ca2+-induced activation of BKCa channels.
Fig. 7

Intracellular LPI potentiates endothelial cell hyperpolarization to low histamine concentrations through BKCa channels. a, b, c Representative endothelial cell hyperpolarization to bath application of 0.1, 0.5, and 2 μM histamine under control conditions (no LPI in patch pipette; a), or in the presence of 0.1 (b) and 1 μM LPI (c) in patch pipette. d Statistical representation of the hyperpolarizing effect of various moderate histamine concentrations (0.1, 0.5, and 2 μM) in the absence or presence of 0.1 or 1 μM LPI into patch pipette [No LPI, 0.1 (n = 19), 0.5 (n = 16), and 2 μM histamine (n = 7); 0.1 μM LPI, 0.1 (n = 10), 0.5 (n = 10), and 2 μM histamine (n = 7); 1 μM LPI, 0.1 (n = 6), 0.5 (n = 7), and 2 μM histamine (n = 5)]. *p < 0.05 vs. the absence of LPI in the pipette. e Representative membrane potential recording showing inhibitory effect of iberiotoxin (100 nM) on potentiated by intrapipette LPI (1 μM) endothelial cell hyperpolarization to 2 μM histamine. f Statistical representation of the effect of iberiotoxin (100 nM) on endothelial cell peak hyperpolarization to 0.5 and 2 μM histamine with and without 1 μM LPI in the pipette; (histamine 0.5 μM − no LPI in pipette ± iberiotoxin, n = 8; 1 μM LPI in pipette ± iberiotoxin, n = 7; histamine 2 μM − no LPI in pipette ± iberiotoxin, n = 8, 1 μM LPI in pipette ± iberiotoxin, n = 11)

To test the effect of LPI under maximal activation of endothelial cells, the cells were stimulated with 100 μM histamine in the absence or presence of 1 μM LPI in the pipette. Notably, 1 μM LPI in the pipette slightly reduced the endothelial cell peak hyperpolarization in response to supramaximal histamine concentration (i.e., 100 μM) from 34.9 ± 1.5 mV (n = 24) to 31.4 ± 1.4 mV (n = 40) (p = 0.055) (Fig. 8a, b, d). To estimate the effect of intracellular LPI on the sustained component of endothelial hyperpolarization, comparison of the membrane potential recovery after the peak has been performed as described previously [3]. In the presence of intracellular LPI (1 μM), the membrane potential declined faster and hyperpolarization after 300 s was 71.7 ± 4.7% of the peak level of −63.9 ± 1.2 mV (n = 11). In contrast, in the absence of LPI in the patch pipette, the hyperpolarization to 100 μM histamine after 300 s was 90.1 ± 5.6% (Fig. 8e) of the peak level of −71 ± 2.6 (n = 5). In the combined presence of external iberiotoxin (100 nM) and internal LPI (1 μM), the sustained component of endothelial hyperpolarization was further decreased as evidenced from further reduction of hyperpolarization after 300 s to 58.2 ± 8.7% (n = 5) (Fig. 8c, e) from the peak level of −60.1 ± 3.6 mV. These data support our findings presented in isolated patches and indicate that LPI indeed exhibits inhibitory properties on BKCa channel activity under conditions of excessive endothelial cell stimulation, thus, approving the concept of the dual modulator function of LPI in the vascular wall.
Fig. 8

Intracellular LPI counteracts endothelial cell hyperpolarization to supramaximal histamine concentrations. a–c Representative endothelial cell hyperpolarization to bath application of 100 μM histamine under control condition (a) and under condition of cell dialysis with 1 μM LPI via patch pipette in the absence (b) and presence (c) of external iberiotoxin (IbTx, 100 nM). d Statistical representation of the effect of cell dialysis with 1 μM LPI in the absence and presence of external 100 nM iberiotoxin (IbTx) on peak endothelial cell hyperpolarization to supramaximal histamine concentration (i.e., 100 μM). *p < 0.1 vs. in the absence of LPI in the pipette and IbTx in the bath (control, n = 24; LPI, n = 40; IbTx + LPI, n = 9). e Statistical representation of the effect of cell dialysis with 1 μM LPI in the absence and presence of external 100 nM iberiotoxin (IbTx) on sustained endothelial cell hyperpolarization to supramaximal histamine concentration (i.e., 100 μM). Results are expressed as the ratio of mean membrane potential values at 300th second after the peak and at the peak of hyperpolarization. **p < 0.05 vs. in the absence of LPI in the pipette and IbTx in the bath (control, n = 24; LPI, n = 40; IbTx + LPI, n = 9)


Like in many other cell types, in endothelial cells, LPI triggers an increase of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration by either intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and/or the activation of Ca2+ influx that subsequently yields activation of BKCa channels [1, 21, 37, 38]. Very recently, these effects could be attributed to the binding of LPI to the orphan receptor GPR55 endogenously expressed in endothelial cells [42] and in HEK293 cells artificially expressing GPR55 [22, 23, 24]. Moreover, stimulation of endothelial cells with LPI was shown to be accompanied by an activation of BKCa channels that was thought to be a consequence of the LPI-elicited Ca2+ signals [4]. In addition, LPI was shown to affect directly the activity of ion channels, including members of the transient receptor potential channel family [14, 41], endothelial non-selective cation channels [4], and the two-pore domain mechano-gated TREK-1 and TRAAK K+ channels [31]. However, so far, no evidence has been provided for a direct G protein-coupled receptor-independent modulation of BKCa channels by LPI.

The data presented herein demonstrate that LPI, in physiological relevant concentrations [10, 44], dually modifies endothelial BKCa channel activity in isolated inside-out patches as well as in current clamp experiments. Although the presence of Ca2+ was a prerequisite for the modulator effect of LPI on BKCa channels, the mode of the LPI-induced modulation of BKCa channel activity did not essentially depend on the actual Ca2+ concentration or voltage but strictly depended on the basal activity of the channel yielding either pronounced augmentation at low basal activity or attenuation if the basal BKCa channel activity was high. A change from LPI-mediated channel activation (increase in NPo) to channel inhibition occurs at a Po value of approximately 0.3. Because endothelial BKCa channels lack the regulatory β-subunit [34], the experiments using excised membrane patches suggest that LPI exhibits its effects by a direct interaction with the pore-forming component of these ion channels. While our findings in excised patches excludes the involvement of second messengers in the LPI-mediated modulation of BKCa channels, an immediate alteration of the proteolipid environment by LPI that might account for alterations of BKCa channel activity cannot be excluded. However, all effects of LPI on BKCa channels we have observed were sustained, concentration-dependent, and reversible. Importantly, LPI was used in low micromolar concentrations, thus, well below the LPI critical micellar concentration of ~75 μM [13], ensuring that the LPI actions on BKCa channels are caused by LPI monomers and are not due to nonspecific effects of LPI as a detergent. Furthermore, effective LPI concentrations are within the range found under normal (<0.1 μM) and pathological condition (~15 μM) in human tissue fluids [10, 44] and plasma [39].

The observation that both activation and inhibition of BKCa channel activity by LPI occurred in the same concentration range indicates that LPI has similar potency for both phenomena, though it remains unclear whether or not both effects correspond to distinct or identical interaction sites of LPI on the BKCa channel pore protein.

The dual effects of LPI on endothelial BKCa channels were observed both in multiple channel patches and in patches containing only one active channel, indicating that alterations in the channel activity may occur due to changes in the channel's Po rather then changes in the number of active channels per patch. Although the latter possibility cannot be entirely excluded, our observation that the level of potentiation of BKCa channel activity was quantitatively similar (p = 0.34) in patches containing one and several active channels favors for the possibility that modulation of BKCa channel activity occurs without changes in the number of active channels per patch. Moreover, LPI did not affect single-channel current amplitude or its conductance, suggesting that LPI does not alter BKCa channel function by changing the entire conformation of the channel protein. Analysis of single-channel kinetics revealed that LPI acts primarily via alterations of the mean closed time, while the mean open time was only moderately affected, thus indicating that LPI modulates the activity of BKCa channels mainly via a destabilization of the closed states.

The current study describes LPI as an effective stimulator as well as inhibitor of endothelial BKCa channels. Considering that the action of endothelium-dependent vasodilators is mostly underpinned by a rise in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration and membrane potential fluctuations, the dual modulation of endothelial BKCa channels by LPI might be of considerable physiological importance and may reflect a new mechanism of vascular function control by lysophospholipids.

This assumption is directly supported in experiments using the whole-cell recordings approach. In moderately stimulated cells that developed weak to modest hyperpolarization due to the increased cytosolic Ca2+, the stimulatory effect of LPI on BKCa channels remained sustained and increased the peak hyperpolarization to histamine. Remarkably, not all of the stimulatory effect of internal LPI is inhibited by iberiotoxin, indicating that ion channel other then BKCa may partially underpin the stimulatory effect of LPI on endothelial hyperpolarization. Such stimulatory effect of endothelial KCa channels has been already reported by cAMP [18] and yielded elevated Ca2+ signaling and production of nitric oxide [19]. In contrast, under condition of excessive cell stimulation that leads to a strong Ca2+ loading, LPI was found to exhibit an inhibitory effect on endothelial hyperpolarization and, thus, counteracted the excessive cell stimulation. Because endothelial LPI production is controlled by cytosolic Ca2+ [2, 27], these data indicate that cytosolic LPI acts as dual modulator of endothelial hyperpolarizing response. Notably, in isolated rat aorta, sustained endothelial hyperpolarization to acetylcholine is partially mediated by stimulation of Na+–K+ ATPase [3], and LPI was recently shown to inhibit effectively Na+–K+ ATPase [4], raising the possibility that modulatory effect of internal LPI on endothelial electrical responses may be mediated via multiple mechanisms including ion channels and transporters.

Lipids are known to modify BKCa channel activity. In particular, negatively charged lipids and fatty acids were shown to stimulate the BKCa channel, while positively charged lipids with a sufficiently hydrophobic acyl chain suppress the channel activity in inside-out patches [36]. Controversial data regarding the effect of sphingosine on the BKCa channel have been reported with both stimulatory [26] and inhibitory [39] effects. These conflicting findings might point to a similar dual effect of sphingosine on BKCa channel activity than that of LPI reported herein. These findings may significantly extend our understanding of the effects of LPI on plasma ion channels and reveal a new feature of this compound of which the physiological contribution still remains elusive despite the release/existence of LPI in the vasculature/blood is approved. Whether such a dual modification of the activity of the BKCa channel is unique for LPI or exhibits a common feature for other LPLs awaits further investigations.

Strikingly, several substances including ethanol [29] and the xenoestrogen tamoxifen [35] were reported to dually affect BKCa channel activity. However, ethanol exerts its modulator effect on BKCa channels only at concentrations found in the circulation after excessive alcohol consumption (50–100 mM), and the effect of tamoxifen is only of clinical relevancy as this compound is therapeutically used as a competitive antagonist of the estrogen receptor. Nevertheless, among these agents that have a complex action on BKCa channels, LPI is unique as it serves as signaling molecule in the vasculature and can be found naturally in the vasculature/blood under physiological and pathophysiological conditions [10, 44].

Recently, LPI was shown to activate non-selective cation channels both when applied extracellularly or in excised inside-out membrane patches [4, 41]. Therefore, it appears reasonable that LPI may affect ion channels from the outer as well as the inner side of the plasma membrane. However, charged lipids are generally thought to act on the external side of the membrane affecting BKCa channels [7]. Therefore, BKCa channels may probably directly sense LPI from both intracellular and extracellular sides of the membrane. It is known that LPI levels increase almost threefold within seconds upon stimulation of endothelial cells with bradykinin [28]. Such an increase of the cellular LPI content is not specific for bradykinin but is a consequence of elevated cytosolic free Ca2+ [2]. Considering the dual effects of LPI on BKCa channel activity and electrical responses reported in this study, we suggested that intracellularly generated LPI should dually regulate endothelial electrical responses to endothelium-dependent vasodilators. Hence, LPI may serve as potent inter- and intracellular signaling molecule modulating BKCa channels in the vasculature.

In conclusion, we provide new information regarding the effects of LPI on endothelial K+ channels. We demonstrate a direct dual action of LPI on endothelial BKCa channel gating that does not require other cytosolic factors but depend on a cytosolic Ca2+ elevation. These results describe a novel mechanism of the action of LPI and point to LPI as a potential second messenger in endothelial cells. LPI functions as a direct receptor-independent dual modulator of BKCa channels in endothelial cells that impacts electrical responses to agonists and, thus, may affect Ca2+ entry via store-operated and agonist-induced Ca2+ entry pathways [17]. This signaling of LPI might allow a fine tuning of Ca2+ sensitive processes within vascular cells and hence essentially contribute to the control of adequate blood flows in various organs and tissues.



The authors thank Mrs. Anna Schreilechner, BSc, for her excellent technical assistance and Dr. C.J.S. Edgell (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, UCA) for the EA.hy926 cells. We also thank Dr. Maud Frieden (University Geneva, CH) for fruitful discussions and a critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Funds, FWF (P20181-B05, 21857-B18, and F3010-B05 to WFG). The Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry was supported by the infrastructure program of the Austrian Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. 1.
    Begg M, Mo FM, Offertaler L, Batkai S, Pacher P, Razdan RK, Lovinger DM, Kunos G (2003) G protein-coupled endothelial receptor for atypical cannabinoid ligands modulates a Ca2+-dependent K+ current. J Biol Chem 278:46188–46194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Billah MM, Lapetina EG (1982) Formation of lysophosphatidylinositol in platelets stimulated with thrombin or ionophore A23187. J Biol Chem 257:5196–5200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bondarenko A, Sagach V (2006) Na+-K+-ATPase is involved in the sustained ACh-induced hyperpolarization of endothelial cells from rat aorta. Br J Pharmacol 149:958–965CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bondarenko A, Waldeck-Weiermair M, Naghdi S, Poteser M, Malli R, Graier WF (2010) GPR55-dependent and -independent ion signalling in response to lysophosphatidylinositol in endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol 161:308–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen GF, Suzuki H (1990) Calcium dependency of the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization in smooth muscle cells of the rabbit carotid artery. J Physiol Lond 421:521–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi JW, Lee CW, Chun J (2008) Biological roles of lysophospholipid receptors revealed by genetic null mice: an update. Biochim Biophys Acta 1781:531–539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke AL, Petrou S, Walsh JV, Singer JJ (2003) Site of action of fatty acids and other charged lipids on BKCa channels from arterial smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol 284:C607–C619, Cell PhysiolGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colden-Stanfield M, Schilling WP, Possani LD, Kunze DL (1990) Bradykinin-induced potassium current in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. J Membr Biol 116:227–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colden-Stanfield M, Schilling WP, Ritchie AK, Eskin SG, Navarro LT, Kunze DL (1987) Bradykinin-induced increases in cytosolic calcium and ionic currents in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. Circ Res 61:632–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corda D, Iurisci C, Berrie CP (2002) Biological activities and metabolism of the lysophosphoinositides and glycerophosphoinositols. Biochim Biophys Acta 1582:52–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edgell CJ, McDonald CC, Graham JB (1983) Permanent cell line expressing human factor VIII-related antigen established by hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:3734–3737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erdogan A, Schaefer MB, Kuhlmann CR, Most A, Hartmann M, Mayer K, Renner FC, Schaefer C, Abdallah Y, Hoelschermann H, Schaefer CA (2007) Activation of Ca2+-activated potassium channels is involved in lysophosphatidylcholine-induced monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 190:100–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falasca M, Corda D (1994) Elevated levels and mitogenic activity of lysophosphatidylinositol in k-ras-transformed epithelial cells. Eur J Biochem 221:383–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flemming PK, Dedman AM, Xu SZ, Li J, Zeng F, Naylor J, Benham CD, Bateson AN, Muraki K, Beech DJ (2006) Sensing of lysophospholipids by TRPC5 calcium channel. J Biol Chem 281:4977–4982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frieden M, Graier WF (2000) Subplasmalemmal ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ release contributes to Ca2+-dependent K+ channel activation in a human umbilical vein endothelial cell line. J Physiol 524:715–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fukao M, Hattori Y, Kanno M, Sakuma I, Kitabatake A (1997) Sources of Ca2+ in relation to generation of acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization in rat mesenteric artery. Br J Pharmacol 120:1328–1334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Girardin NC, Antigny F, Frieden M (2010) Electrophysiological characterization of store-operated and agonist-induced Ca2+ entry pathways in endothelial cells. Pflugers Arch 460:109–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Graier WF, Groschner K, Schmidt K, Kukovetz WR (1992) Increases in endothelial cyclic AMP levels amplify agonist-induced formation of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF). Biochem J 288:345–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Graier WF, Kukovetz WR, Groschner K (1993) Cyclic AMP enhances agonist-induced Ca2+ entry into endothelial cells by activation of potassium channels and membrane hyperpolarization. Biochem J 291:263–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Groschner K, Graier WF, Kukovetz WR (1992) Activation of a small-conductance Ca2+-dependent K+ channel contributes to bradykinin-induced stimulation of nitric oxide synthesis in pig aortic endothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1137:162–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hasegawa Y, Erickson JR, Goddard GJ, Yu S, Liu S, Cheng KW, Eder A, Bandoh K, Aoki J, Jarosz R, Schrier AD, Lynch KR, Mills GB, Fang X (2003) Identification of a phosphothionate analogue of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) as a selective agonist of the LPA3 receptor. J Biol Chem 278:11962–11969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Henstridge CM, Balenga N, Ford LA, Ross RA, Waldhoer M, Irving AJ (2008) The GPR55 ligand l-{alpha}-lysophosphatidylinositol promotes RhoA-dependent Ca2+ signaling and NFAT activation. FASEB J 23:183–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Henstridge CM, Balenga NA, Schröder R, Kargl JK, Platzer W, Martini L, Arthur S, Penman J, Whistler JL, Kostenis E, Waldhoer M, Irving AJ (2010) GPR55 ligands promote receptor coupling to multiple signalling pathways. Br J Pharmacol 160:604–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kapur A, Zhao P, Sharir H, Bai Y, Caron MG, Barak LS, Abood ME (2009) Atypical responsiveness of the orphan receptor GPR55 to cannabinoid ligands. J Biol Chem 284:29817–29827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karliner JS (2002) Lysophospholipids and the cardiovascular system. Biochim Biophys Acta 1582:216–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim MY, Liang GH, Kim JA, Kim YJ, Oh S, Suh SH (2006) Sphingosine-1-phosphate activates BKCa channels independently of G protein-coupled receptor in human endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290:C1000–C1008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kobayashi T, Kishimoto M, Okuyama H (1996) Phospholipases involved in lysophosphatidylinositol metabolism in rat brain. J Lipid Mediat Cell Signal 14:33–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lambert TL, Kent RS, Whorton AR (1986) Bradykinin stimulation of inositol polyphosphate production in porcine aortic endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 261:15288–15293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu J, Vaithianathan T, Manivannan K, Parrill A, Dopico AM (2008) Ethanol modulates BKCa channels by acting as an adjuvant of calcium. Mol Pharmacol 74:628–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luckhoff A, Busse R (1990) Calcium influx into endothelial cells and formation of endothelium-derived relaxing factor is controlled by the membrane potential. Pflugers Arch 416:305–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maingret F, Patel AJ, Lesage F, Lazdunski M, Honoré E (2000) Lysophospholipids open the two-pore domain mechano-gated K+ channels TREK-1 and TRAAK. J Biol Chem 275:10128–10133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oka S, Nakajima K, Yamashita A, Kishimoto S, Sugiura T (2007) Identification of GPR55 as a lysophosphatidylinositol receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 362:928–934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oka S, Toshida T, Maruyama K, Nakajima K, Yamashita A, Sugiura T (2008) 2-Arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoinositol: a possible natural ligand for GPR55. J Biochem 145:13–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Papassotiriou J, Kohler R, Prenen J, Krause H, Akbar M, Eggermont J, Paul M, Distler A, Nilius B, Hoyer J (2000) Endothelial K+ channel lacks the Ca2+ sensitivity-regulating beta subunit. FASEB J 14:885–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pérez GJ (2005) Dual effect of tamoxifen on arterial KCa channels does not depend on the presence of the beta1 subunit. J Biol Chem 280:21739–21747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Petrou S, Ordway RW, Kirber MT, Dopico AM, Hamilton JA, Walsh JV, Singer JJ (1995) Direct effects of fatty acids and other charged lipids on ion channel activity in smooth muscle cells. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 52:173–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Repp H, Birringer J, Koschinski A, Dreyer F (2001) Activation of a Ca2+-dependent K+ current in mouse fibroblasts by sphingosine-1-phosphate involves the protein tyrosine kinase c-Src. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 363:295–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schilling T, Repp H, Richter H, Koschinski A, Heinemann U, Dreyer F, Eder C (2002) Lysophospholipids induce membrane hyperpolarization in microglia by activation of IKCa1 Ca2+-dependent K+ channels. Neuroscience 109:827–835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shen Z, Wu M, Elson P, Kennedy AW, Belinson J, Casey G, Xu Y (2001) Fatty acid composition of lysophosphatidic acid and lysophosphatidylinositol in plasma from patients with ovarian cancer and other gynecological diseases. Gynecol Oncol 83:25–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vaithianathan T, Bukiya A, Liu J, Liu P, Asuncion-Chin M, Fan Z, Dopico A (2008) Direct regulation of BK channels by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate as a novel signaling pathway. J Gen Physiol 132:13–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vanden Abeele F, Zholos A, Bidaux G, Shuba Y, Thebault S, Beck B, Flourakis M, Panchin Y, Skryma R, Prevarskaya N (2006) Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2-dependent gating of TRPM8 by lysophospholipids. J Biol Chem 281:40174–40182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Waldeck-Weiermair M, Zoratti C, Osibow K, Balenga N, Goessnitzer E, Waldhoer M, Malli R, Graier WF (2008) Integrin clustering enables anandamide-induced Ca2+ signaling in endothelial cells via GPR55 by protection against CB1-receptor-triggered repression. J Cell Sci 121:1704–1717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wolfram Kuhlmann CR, Wiebke Lüdders D, Schaefer CA, Kerstin Most A, Backenköhler U, Neumann T, Tillmanns H, Erdogan A (2004) Lysophosphatidylcholine-induced modulation of Ca2+-activated K+ channels contributes to ROS-dependent proliferation of cultured human endothelial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 36:675–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xiao YJ, Schwartz B, Washington M, Kennedy A, Webster K, Belinson J, Xu Y (2001) Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis of lysophospholipids in human ascitic fluids: comparison of the lysophospholipid contents in malignant vs nonmalignant ascitic fluids. Anal Biochem 290:302–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yamashita A, Kumazawa T, Koga H, Suzuki N, Oka S, Sugiura T (2010) Generation of lysophosphatidylinositol by DDHD domain containing 1 (DDHD1): possible involvement of phospholipase D/phosphatidic acid in the activation of DDHD1. Biochim Biophys Acta 1801:711–720PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander I. Bondarenko
    • 1
  • Rolland Malli
    • 1
  • Wolfgang F. Graier
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center of Molecular MedicineMedical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations