Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 451, Issue 4, pp 534–543

Inconsistent effects of acidosis on HIF-α protein and its target genes

  • Carsten Willam
  • Christina Warnecke
  • Jörg C. Schefold
  • Jan Kügler
  • Petra Koehne
  • Ulrich Frei
  • Michael Wiesener
  • Kai-Uwe Eckardt
Cell and Molecular Physiology

Abstract

The transcription factor HIF-1α has been identified as a key regulator in the cellular and systemic response to hypoxia. Because hypoxia is frequently associated with acidosis, like in ischemia or tumour growth, we studied the impact of acidosis on the expression of the HIF-1α and HIF-2α proteins and that of the three HIF target genes carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9), glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) and erythropoietin (EPO). Since the HIF-prolyl hydroxylases (PHD) modulate cellular HIF-α protein levels we also investigated changes in PHD mRNA expression under hypoxia and acidosis. HIF-1α immunoblots revealed, depending on the cell line investigated, a moderate induction of HIF-α protein levels by acidosis in normoxia (Hep3B cells) or hypoxia (HeLa cells). Concordantly, the activity of HIF-driven luciferase reporters was slightly enhanced at pH 7.0. In contrast, HIF target genes exhibited divergent responses to acidosis: basal and hypoxia-induced CA-9 mRNA levels were further increased, whereas hypoxic EPO mRNA induction was attenuated, and Glut-1 mRNA levels were not altered by acidosis. Except from a small increase of hypoxia-induced PHD3 mRNA levels in HeLa cells, there was also no significant effect of acidosis on PHD expression. In conclusion, albeit HIF protein levels slightly induced by acidosis and the inconsistent regulation of HIF target genes under acidosis suggest additional, yet unidentified pH-sensitive factors to be involved in the regulation of these genes.

Keywords

HIF-1 Hypoxia pH Acidosis Prolyl hydroxylases Carbonic anhydrase Erythropoietin Glucose transporter-1 

References

  1. 1.
    Almaas R, Pytte M, Lindstad JK, Wright M, Saugstad OD, Pleasure D, Rootwelt T (2003) Acidosis has opposite effects on neuronal survival during hypoxia and reoxygenation. J Neurochem 84:1018–1027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beasley NJ, Wykoff CC, Watson PH, Leek R, Turley H, Gatter K, Pastorek J, Cox GJ, Ratcliffe P, Harris AL (2001) Carbonic anhydrase IX, an endogenous hypoxia marker, expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and its relationship to hypoxia, necrosis, and microvessel density. Cancer Res 61:5262–5267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berra E, Benizri E, Ginouves A, Volmat V, Roux D, Pouyssegur J (2003) HIF prolyl-hydroxylase 2 is the key oxygen sensor setting low steady-state levels of HIF-1alpha in normoxia. Embo J 22:4082–4090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bing OH, Brooks WW, Messer JV (1973) Heart muscle viability following hypoxia: protective effect of acidosis. Science 180:1297–1298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruick RK, McKnight SL (2001) A conserved family of prolyl-4-hydroxylases that modify HIF. Science 294:1337–1340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruick RK (2003) Oxygen sensing in the hypoxic response pathway: regulation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor. Genes Dev 17:2614–2623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen RA, Miller ME, Garcia JF, Moccia G, Cronkite EP (1981) Regulatory mechanism of erythropoietin production: effects of hypoxemia and hypercarbia. Exp Hematol 9:513–521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D’Angelo G, Duplan E, Boyer N, Vigne P, Frelin C (2003) Hypoxia up-regulates prolyl hydroxylase activity: a feedback mechanism that limits HIF-1 responses during reoxygenation. J Biol Chem 278:38183–38187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D’Arcangelo D, Facchiano F, Barlucchi LM, Melillo G, Illi B, Testolin L, Gaetano C, Capogrossi MC (2000) Acidosis inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis and function and induces basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Circ Res 86:312–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eckardt KU, Kurtz A, Bauer C (1990) Triggering of erythropoietin production by hypoxia is inhibited by respiratory and metabolic acidosis. Am J Physiol 258:R678–R683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Epstein AC, Gleadle JM, McNeill LA, Hewitson KS, O’Rourke J, Mole DR, Mukherji M, Metzen E, Wilson MI, Dhanda A, Tian YM, Masson N, Hamilton DL, Jaakkola P, Barstead R, Hodgkin J, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Schofield CJ, Ratcliffe PJ (2001) C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell 107:43–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaakkola P, Mole DR, Tian YM, Wilson MI, Gielbert J, Gaskell SJ, Kriegsheim A, Hebestreit HF, Mukherji M, Schofield CJ, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ (2001) Targeting of HIF-alpha to the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science 292:468–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klausen T, Christensen H, Hansen JM, Nielsen OJ, Fogh-Andersen N, Olsen NV (1996) Human erythropoietin response to hypocapnic hypoxia, normocapnic hypoxia, and hypocapnic normoxia. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 74:475–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lemasters JJ, Bond JM, Chacon E, Harper IS, Kaplan SH, Ohata H, Trollinger DR, Herman B, Cascio WE (1996) The pH paradox in ischemia-reperfusion injury to cardiac myocytes. EXS 76:99–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME, Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maher ER, Ratcliffe PJ (1999) The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 399:271–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mekhail K, Gunaratnam L, Bonicalzi ME, Lee S (2004) HIF activation by pH-dependent nucleolar sequestration of VHL. Nat Cell Biol 6:642–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller ME, Rorth M, Parving HH, Howard D, Reddington I, Valeri CR, Stohlman F Jr (1973) pH effect on erythropoietin response to hypoxia. N Engl J Med 288:706–710PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penttila A, Trump BF (1974) Extracellular acidosis protects Ehrlich ascites tumor cells and rat renal cortex against anoxic injury. Science 185:277–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Plesnila N, Haberstok J, Peters J, Kolbl I, Baethmann A, Staub F (1999) Effect of lactacidosis on cell volume and intracellular pH of astrocytes. J Neurotrauma 16:831–841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pollock AS (1984) Intracellular pH of hepatocytes in primary monolayer culture. Am J Physiol 246:F738–F744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Potter CP, Harris AL (2003) Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications of carbonic anhydrases in cancer. Br J Cancer 89:2–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rohra DK, Saito SY, Ohizumi Y (2003) Extracellular acidosis results in higher intracellular acidosis and greater contraction in spontaneously hypertensive rat aorta. Eur J Pharmacol 465:141–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Safran M, Kaelin WG Jr (2003) HIF hydroxylation and the mammalian oxygen-sensing pathway. J Clin Invest 111:779–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scortegagna M, Morris MA, Oktay Y, Bennett M, Garcia JA (2003) The HIF family member EPAS1/HIF-2alpha is required for normal hematopoiesis in mice. Blood 102:1634–1640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scott PA, Gleadle JM, Bicknell R, Harris AL (1998) Role of the hypoxia sensing system, acidity and reproductive hormones in the variability of vascular endothelial growth factor induction in human breast carcinoma cell lines. Int J Cancer 75:706–712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shi Q, Le X, Wang B, Abbruzzese JL, Xiong Q, He Y, Xie K (2001) Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by acidosis in human cancer cells. Oncogene 20:3751–3756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spector JA, Mehrara BJ, Greenwald JA, Saadeh PB, Steinbrech DS, Bouletreau PJ, Smith LP, Longaker MT (2001) Osteoblast expression of vascular endothelial growth factor is modulated by the extracellular microenvironment. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280:C72–C80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Warnecke C, Zaborowska Z, Kurreck J, Erdmann V, Frei U, Wiesener M, Eckardt KU (2004) Differentiating the functional role of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 and HIF-2 (EPAS-1) by the use of RNA interference: erythropoietin is a HIF-2 target gene in Hep3B and Kelly cells. FASEB Journal 18:1462–1464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wenger RH (2002) Cellular adaptation to hypoxia: O2-sensing protein hydroxylases, hypoxia-inducible transcription factors, and O2-regulated gene expression. FASEB J 16:1151–1162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Willam C, Masson N, Tian YM, Mahmood SA, Wilson MI, Bicknell R, Eckardt KU, Maxwell PH, Ratcliffe PJ, Pugh CW (2002) Peptide blockade of HIFalpha degradation modulates cellular metabolism and angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10423–10428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wykoff CC, Beasley NJ, Watson PH, Turner KJ, Pastorek J, Sibtain A, Wilson GD, Turley H, Talks KL, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ, Harris AL (2000) Hypoxia-inducible expression of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases. Cancer Res 60:7075–7083PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Willam
    • 1
  • Christina Warnecke
    • 1
  • Jörg C. Schefold
    • 2
  • Jan Kügler
    • 2
  • Petra Koehne
    • 2
  • Ulrich Frei
    • 2
  • Michael Wiesener
    • 1
  • Kai-Uwe Eckardt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medizinische Klinik IVUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive CareCharitè, Campus Virchow KlinikumBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations