Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 446, Issue 1, pp 36–41 | Cite as

Calmodulin antagonists suppress gap junction coupling in isolated Hensen cells of the guinea pig cochlea

  • Alexander Blödow
  • Anaclet Ngezahayo
  • Arne Ernst
  • Hans-Albert KolbEmail author
Cell and Molecular Physiology


The effect of calmodulin (CaM) antagonists W7, trifluoperazine (TFP) and a calmodulin inhibitory peptide on gap junction coupling in isolated Hensen cells of the organ of Corti was analysed by the double whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Addition of the conventional antagonists W7 and TFP in the micromolar range caused a rapid decrease of gap junction conductance after a delay of a few minutes in a dose-dependent manner. Fluorescence spectroscopy of cytoplasmic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) by Fura-2 showed no significant change of [Ca2+]i by W7. Chelation of [Ca2+]i by 10 mM BAPTA or use of nominally Ca2+-free external bath did not suppress the W7-induced gap junction uncoupling. The results suggest that W7 and TFP induce gap junction uncoupling at unchanged global [Ca2+]i in Hensen cells. To obtain additional evidence for an involvement of CaM in regulating gap junction conductance a calmodulin inhibitory peptide, the MLCK peptide (250 nM), was added to the standard pipette solution. Again gap junction uncoupling was observed, but on a significantly slower time scale. This is the first study of an effect of calmodulin antagonists on gap junction coupling in isolated Hensen cells. The question whether the effect of calmodulin inhibitors is specific and involves CaM-dependent gating of gap junction coupling in Hensen cells is discussed.


Calmodulin antagonists Cochlea Double whole-cell patch-clamp Gap junctions Hensen cells 



The authors would like to thank Drs. C. Peracchia, H. Evans, and K. Török for helpful discussions and Dr. C. Zeilinger for calmodulin alignment to connexins. This work was partially supported by a grant from the Fritz-Thyssen-Stiftung.


  1. 1.
    Peracchia C, Wang XG, Peracchia LL (2000) Slow gating of gap junction channels and calmodulin. J Membr Biol 178:55–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Willecke K, Eiberger J, Degen J, Eckhardt D, Romualdi A, Güldenagel M, Deutsch U, Söhl U (2002) Structural and functional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome. Biol Chem 383:725–737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL (1996) Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem 244:1–27Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Eldik LJ, Hertzberg EL, Berdan RC, Gilula NB (1985) Interaction of calmodulin and other calcium-modulated proteins with mammalian and arthropod junctional membrane proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 126:825–832PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levitan IB (1999) It is calmodulin after all! Mediator of the calcium modulation of multiple ion channels. Neuron 22:645–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zimmer DB, Green CR, Evans WE, Gilula NB (1987) Topological analysis of the major protein isolated intact rat liver gap junctions and gap junction-derived single membrane structures. J Biol Chem 262:7751–7763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peracchia C, Sotkis A, Wang XG, Peracchia LL, Persechini A (2000) Calmodulin directly gates gap junction channels. J Biol Chem 275:26220–26224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Toeroek K, Stauffer K, Evans WH (1997) Connexin 32 of gap junctions contain two cytoplasmic calmodulin-binding domains. Biochem J 326:479–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmad S, Martin PEM, Evans WH (2001) Assembly of gap junction channels. Mechanism, effects of calmodulin antagonists and identification of connexin oligomerization determinants. Eur J Biochem 268:4544–4552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diez JA, Elvira M, Villalobo A (1998) The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylates connexin 32. Mol Cell Biochem 187:201210Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saez JC, Nairn AC, Czernik AJ, Spray DC, Hertzberg EL, Greengard P, Bennett MVL (1990) Phosphorylation of connexin-32 a hepatocyte gap-junction protein by cAMP-dependent protein-kinase, protein-kinase-c and Ca2+ calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-II. Eur J Biochem 192:263–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elvira M, Villalobo A (1997) Calmodulin prevents the proteolysis of connexin 32 by m-calpain. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 42:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peracchia C (1987) Calmodulin-like proteins and communicating junctions. Electrical uncoupling of crayfish septate axons is inhibited by the calmodulin inhibitor W7 and is not affected by cyclic nucleotides. Pflugers Arch 408:379–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Delage B, Deleze J (1998) Increase of the gap junction conductance of adult mammalian heart myocytes by intracellular calcium ions. In: Werner R (ed) Gap junctions. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 72–75Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kikuchi T, Kimura RS, Paul DL, Takasaka T, Adams JC (2000) Gap junction systems in the mammalian cochlea. Brain Res Rev 32:163–166Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lautermann J, Cate WJF ten, Altenhoff P, Gruemmer R, Traub O, Frank HG, Jahnke K, Winterhager E (1998) Expression of the gap-junction connexins 26 and 30 in the rat cochlea. Cell Tissue Res 294:415–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Forge A, Becker D, Casalotti S, Edwards J, Evans WH, Lench N, Souter M (1999) Gap junction-mediated intercellular signaling in heath and disease. Novartis Foundation Symposium 219. Wiley, Chichester, pp 134–156Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Santos-Sacchi J (2000) Cell coupling in the organ of Corti. Brain Res Rev 32:167–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kikuchi T, Adams JC, Miyabe Y, So E, Kobayashi (2000) Potassium ion recycling pathway via gap junction systems in the mammalian cochlea and its interruption in hereditary nonsyndromic deafness. Med Electron Microsc 33:51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laver DR, Cherry CA, Walker NA (1997) The actions of calmodulin antagonists W-7 and TFP and of calcium on the gating kinetics of the calcium-activated large conductance potassium channel of the Chara protoplasmic drop: a substrate-sensitive analysis. J Membr Biol 155:263–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Todt I, Ngezahayo A, Ernst A, Kolb HA (2001) Hydrogen peroxide inhibits gap junctional coupling and modulates intracellular free calcium in cochlear Hensen-cells. J Membr Biol 181: 107–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Neyton J, Trautmann A (1985) Single-channel currents of an intercellular junction. Nature 317:331–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ngezahayo A, Kolb HA (1994) Regulation of gap junctional coupling in isolated pancreatic acinar cell pairs by cholecystokinin-octapeptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and a VIP-antagonist. J Membr Biol 139:127–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Donaldson PJ, Dong Y, Roos M, Green C, Goodenough DA, Kistler J (1995) Changes in lens connexin expression lead to increased gap junctional voltage dependence and conductance. Am J Physiol 69:C590–C600Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ngezahayo A, Kolb HA (1993) Gap junction conductance tunes phase difference of cholecystokinin evoked calcium oscillations in pairs of pancreatic acinar cells. Pflugers Arch 422:413–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Török K, Trentham DR (1994) Mechanism of 2-chloro-(epsilon-amino-Lys75)-[6-[4-(N,N-diethylamino)phenyl]-1,3,5-trizian-4-yl]calmodulin interactions with smooth muscle myosin light-chain kinase and derived peptides. Biochemistry 33:12807–12820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berridge MJ (1997) Elementary and global aspects of calcium. J Physiol (Lond) 499:291–306Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harris LH (2001) Emerging issues of connexin channels: biophysics fills the gap. Q Rev Biophys 34:325–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Somogyi R, Kolb HA (1988) Cell-to-cell channel conductance during loss of gap junctional coupling in pairs of pancreatic acinar and Chinese hamster ovary cells. Pflugers Arch 412:54–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pusch M, Neher E (1988) Rates of diffusional exchange between small cells and measuring patch pipette. Pflugers Arch 411:2634–2638Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Osawa M, Swindells MB, Tanikawa J, Tanaka T, Mas T, Furuya T, Ikura M (1998) Solution structure of calmodulin-W7 complex: the basis of diversity in molecular recognition. J Mol Biol 276:165–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dalgarno DC, Klevit RE, Levine BA, Dcott GMM, Williams RJP, Gergley J, Grabarek Z, Laevis PC, Grand RJA, Drabikowski W (1984) The nature of the trifluoperazine binding sites on calmodulin and troponin-C. Biochim Biophys Acta 791:164–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hickie RA, Vandoselaar M, Quail JW, Delbaere LTJ (1997) Induction of a major conformational change in calcium-calmodulin (Ca2+-CaM) by trifluperazine (TFP). J Protein Eng 10:47Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang M, Tanaka T, Ikura M (1995) Calcium-induced conformational transition revealed by the solution structure of apo-calmodulin. Nat Struct Biol 2:758–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Matsushima N, Hayashi N, Jinbo Y, Izumi Y (2000) Ca2+ bound calmodulin forms a compact globular structure on binding four trifluoperazine molecules in solution. Biochem J 347:211-215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Adkins CE, Morris SA, Smedt H de, Sienaert I, Török K, Taylor CW (2000) Ca2+-calmodulin inhibits Ca2+ release mediated by type 1, 2 and 3 inositol trisphosphate receptors. Biochem J 345:357–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schumacher MA, Rivard AF, Bächinger HP, Adelmann JP (2001) Structure of the gating domain of a Ca2+-activated K+ channel complexed with Ca2+/calmodulin. Nature 410:1120–1124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Puscher B, Schacht J (1997) Calmodulin-dependent protein kinases mediate calcium-induced slow motility of mammalian outer hair cells. Hear Res 110:251–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li Y, Liu C, Lang H, Chen X, Liu B, Guo L (2001) Changes of DPOA and cytoskeletal proteins in organ of Corti following middle-level pure tone exposure in guinea pigs (abstract). 24th Midwinter Meeting Assoc Res Otolaryngol, abstr 22071Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag  2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Blödow
    • 1
  • Anaclet Ngezahayo
    • 1
  • Arne Ernst
    • 2
  • Hans-Albert Kolb
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of BiophysicsUniversity Hanover HannoverGermany
  2. 2.Department of OtolaryngologyUKB BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations