Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 404, Issue 5, pp 557–564 | Cite as

Complete mesocolic excision does not increase short-term complications in laparoscopic left-sided colectomies: a comparative retrospective single-center study

  • Maxime DewulfEmail author
  • Alain Kalmar
  • Bert Vandenberk
  • Filip Muysoms
  • Barbara Defoort
  • Donald Claeys
  • Pieter Pletinckx
Original Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Since the implementation of total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer surgery, oncological outcomes improved dramatically. With the technique of complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL), the same surgical principles were introduced to the field of colon cancer surgery. Until now, current literature fails to invariably demonstrate its oncological superiority when compared to conventional surgery, and there are some concerns on increased morbidity. The aim of this study is to compare short-term outcomes after left-sided laparoscopic CME versus conventional surgery.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, data on all laparoscopic sigmoidal resections performed during a 3-year period (October 2015 to October 2018) at our institution were collected. A comparative analysis between the CME group—for sigmoid colon cancer—and the non-CME group—for benign disease—was performed.

Results

One hundred sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Data on 66 CME resections were compared with 97 controls. Median age and operative risk were higher in the CME group. One leak was observed in the CME group (1/66) and 3 in the non-CME group (3/97), representing no significant difference. Regarding hospital stay, postoperative complications, surgical site infections, and intra-abdominal collections, no differences were observed. There was a slightly lower reoperation (1.5% versus 6.2%, p = 0.243) and readmission rate (4.5% versus 6.2%, p = 0.740) in the CME group during the first 30 postoperative days. Operation times were significantly longer in the CME group (210 versus 184 min, p < 0.001), and a trend towards longer pathological specimens in the CME group was noted (21 vs 19 cm, p = 0.059).

Conclusions

CME does not increase short-term complications in laparoscopic left-sided colectomies. Significantly longer operation times were observed in the CME group.

Keywords

Colonic neoplasm Sigmoid neoplasm Complete mesocolic excision Central vascular ligation Laparoscopic surgery 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

Maxime Dewulf: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of manuscript. Alain Kalmar: analysis and interpretation of data and critical revision of manuscript. Bert Vandenberk: analysis and interpretation of data and critical revision of manuscript. Filip Muysoms: critical revision of manuscript. Barbara Defoort: acquisition of data. Donald Claeys: acquisition of data. Pieter Pletinckx: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and critical revision of manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Drs. Maxime Dewulf, Bert Vandenberk, Barbara Defoort, Donald Claeys, and Pieter Pletinckx have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. Alain Kalmar reports having patents on steerable laparoscopic instruments. Dr. Filip Muysoms reports having received research grants from Medtronic and Dynamesh; received speakers honorarium from Medtronic, Bard-Davol, Dynamesh, and Intuitive Surgical; and received consultancy fees from Medtronic, Intuitive Surgical, and CMR Surgical.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (ethics committee Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium—Reference Number MMS.2018.063) before the start of data collection.

Informed consent

In this retrospective analysis, all data were gathered and processed in an anonymized manner. In accordance with national regulations and after consultation of the ethics committee, a specific written informed consent for this study was not obtained.

References

  1. 1.
    Heald R, Ryall R (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig J, Heald R, Langmark F, Myrvold H, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45(7):857–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Color Dis 11(4):354–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bokey E, Chapuis P, Dent O, Mander B, Bissett I, Newland R (2003) Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46(7):860–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liang J, Fazio V, Lavery I, Remzi F, Hull T, Strong S, Church J (2015) Primacy of surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 102(7):847–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Storli K, Søndenaa K, Furnes B, Nesvik I, Gudlaugsson E, Bukholm I, Eide G (2014) Short term results of complete (D3) vs. standard (D2) mesenteric excision in colon cancer shows improved outcome of complete mesenteric excision in patients with TNM stages I-II. Tech Coloproctol 18(6):557–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bertelsen C, Neuenschwander A, Jansen J, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma J, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Rasmussen L, Jepsen L, Iversen E, Kristensen B, Gögenur I, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2015) Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16(2):161–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emmanuel A, Haji A (2016) Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature. Int J Color Dis 31(4):797–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liang J, Lai H, Huang J, Sun C (2015) Long-term oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes. Surg Endosc 29(8):2394–2401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Faerden A, Sjo O, Bukholm I, Andersen S, Svindland A, Nesbakken A, Bakka A (2011) Lymph node micrometastases and isolated tumor cells influence survival in stage I and II colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):200–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galizia G, Lieto E, De Vita F, Ferraraccio F, Zamboli A, Mabilia A, Auricchio A, Castellano P, Napolitano V, Orditura M (2014) Is complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers? A prospective study. Int J Color Dis 29(1):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Merkel S, Weber K, Matzel K, Agaimy A, Gohl J, Hohenberger W (2016) Prognosis of patients with colonic carcinoma before, during and after implementation of complete mesocolic excision. Br J Surg 103:1220–1229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alhassan N, Yang M, Wong-Chong N, Liberman A, Charlebois P, Stein B, Fried G, Lee L (2018) Comparison between conventional colectomy and complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis. A review of CME versus conventional colectomies. Surg Endosc 33:8–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6419-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bertelsen C, Neuenschwander A, Jansen J, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma J, Wilhelmsen M, Rasmussen L, Jepsen L, Kristensen B, Gögenur I, Copenhagen Complete Mesocolic Excision Study (COMES), Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) (2016) Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with ‘conventional’ colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg 103:581–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rahbari N, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald R, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong W, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler M (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147(3):339–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Posabella A, Rotigliano N, Tampakis A, von Fluë M, Füglistaler I (2018) Peripheral vs pedicle division in laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis: a 10-year experience. Int J Color Dis 33:887–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sohn M, Schlitt H, Hornung M, Zülke C, Hochrein A, Moser C, Agha A (2017) Preservation of the superior rectal artery: influence of surgical technique on anastomotic healing and postoperative morbidity in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Int J Color Dis 32:955–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Desiderio J, Listorti C, Parisi A, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Is superior mesenteric artery ligation during sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease associated with increased anastomotic leakage? A meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized clinical trials. Color Dis 14:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tagliacozzo S, Tocchi A (1997) Extended mesenteric excision in right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of the colon. Int J Color Dis 12:272–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Søndenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kessler H, Brown G, Tudyka V, D'Hoore A, Kennedy R, West N, Kim S, Heald R, Storli K, Nesbakken A, Moran B (2014) The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery: proceedings of a consensus conference. Int J Color Dis 29(4):419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    West N, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, Perrakis A, Weber K, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Quirke P (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30(15):1763–1769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng H, Zhao X, Zhang Z, Han D, Mao Z, Lu A, Thasler W (2016) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for stage II/III left-sided colon cancers: a prospective study and comparison with D3 lymph node dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26(8):606–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    West N, Kennedy R, magro T, Luglio G, Sala S, Jenkins J, Quirke P (2014) Morphometric analysis and lymph node yield in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision performed by supervised trainees. Br J Surg 101:1460–1467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldstein N, Soman A, Sacksner J (1999) Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements. The effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage. Am J Clin Pathol 111(3):349–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryMaria MiddelaresGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive CareMaria MiddelaresGhentBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Cardiovascular SciencesUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations