Advertisement

Development and validation of a new score for measuring post-operative complications

  • Rajesh Panwar
  • Vedavyas Mohapatra
  • Karthik Raichurkar
  • Peush Sahni
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

Assigning a numerical value to post-operative morbidity may improve its usefulness as an outcome measure. The recently developed Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) is a step forward in this process but assigns an inappropriately high score to a combination of complications.

Methods

We developed a new score called the complication severity score (CSS) using a mathematical process and compared it with the CCI using a questionnaire-based survey of 49 experienced gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgeons. The CSS was modified based on the results of this survey and was correlated with other patient-centered outcomes in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery.

Results

Of the nine sets of scenarios, experienced surgeons’ opinion matched with CSS in 6, CSS as well as CCI in 1, and neither CSS nor CCI in 2 scenarios. Of the total 441 responses, 281 matched with CSS while 143 matched with CCI (p = 0.0001, odds ratio: 3.7; 95% CI: 2.8 to 4.8). The modified CSS significantly correlated with the post-operative length of stay (r = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.82; p < 0.001), the length of ICU stay (r = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.70; p < 0.001) and with the difference between pre-operative and post-operative quality of life scores in the physical (r = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.42; p < 0.001) and social (r = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.43; p < 0.001) domains.

Conclusions

The CSS more often matched the opinion of experienced senior surgeons compared to CCI. The modified CSS significantly correlated with other patient-centered outcomes.

Keywords

Morbidity Clavien–Dindo Comprehensive complication index Complication severity score Post-operative complications 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

RP: conceptualization, study planning, data collection & compilation, manuscript preparation, statistical analysis. VM: data collection & compilation. KR: data collection & compilation. PS: study planning, data collection, editing of manuscript. All authors were involved in the drafting of the work and revising it critically for important intellectual content and have approved the version to be published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure

The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

Conflicts of interest

Authors RP, VM, KR & PS have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

423_2018_1701_MOESM1_ESM.docx (110 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 110 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Brennan MF, Radzyner M, Rubin DM (2009) Outcome—more than just operative mortality. J Surg Oncol 99:470–477.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21174 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD (2011) Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 364:2128–2137.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1010705 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Slankamenac K, Nederlof N, Pessaux P et al (2014) The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 260:757–762; discussion 762-763.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000948 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim T-H, Suh Y-S, Huh Y-J, Son YG, Park JH, Yang JY, Kong SH, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Slankamenac K, Clavien PA, Yang HK (2018) The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a more sensitive complication index than the conventional Clavien-Dindo classification in radical gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer 21:171–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0728-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saxena S, Chandiramani K, Bhargava R (1998) WHOQOL-Hindi: a questionnaire for assessing quality of life in health care settings in India. World Health Organization Quality of Life. Natl Med J India 11:160–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurosaki I, Hatakeyama K (2005) Preservation of the left gastric vein in delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 9:846–852.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.02.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rahbari NN, Reissfelder C, Koch M, Elbers H, Striebel F, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) The predictive value of postoperative clinical risk scores for outcome after hepatic resection: a validation analysis in 807 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3640–3649.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1829-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery & Liver TransplantationAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations