Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 403, Issue 5, pp 573–580 | Cite as

Is systematic nasogastric decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy really necessary?

  • Elodie Gaignard
  • Damien Bergeat
  • Laetitia Courtin-Tanguy
  • Michel Rayar
  • Aude Merdrignac
  • Fabien Robin
  • Karim Boudjema
  • Helene Beloeil
  • Bernard Meunier
  • Laurent SulpiceEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 149 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Since the spread of enhanced recovery programs, early withdrawal of the nasogastric tube (NGT) is recommended after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), although few data on the safety of this practice are available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the absence of nasogastric decompression after PD on postoperative outcome.

Study design

All consecutive patients undergoing PD between January 2014 and December 2015 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Since May 2015, all operated patients had the NGT removed immediately after the procedure (NGT− group) and were compared to patients operated before this practice (NGT+ group), who had the NGT maintained until at least postoperative day 3.

Results

During the study period, 139 patients underwent PD, of whom 40 (29%) were in the NGT− group and 99 (71%) were in the NGT+ group. The length of hospital stay (LOS) and rate of postoperative complications of grade 2 or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system were significantly higher in the NGT+ group [14 (11–25) vs. 10 (8–14.2), P = 0.005 and 82.8 vs. 40%, P < 0.001, respectively]. Incidence and severity of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) grade B–C were also higher in the NGT+ group (45.5 vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups concerning the 90-day postoperative mortality (P = 0.18).

Conclusion

The absence of systematic nasogastric decompression after PD might reduce postoperative complications, DGE, and LOS. These encouraging results deserve to be confirmed by a prospective randomized study (NCT: 02594956).

Keywords

Pancreaticoduodenectomy Nasogastric tube Enhanced recovery Delayed gastric emptying 

Abbreviations

NGT

Nasogastric tube

PD

Pancreaticoduodenectomy

LOS

Length of hospital stay

DGE

Delayed gastric emptying

ERAS

Enhanced recovery after surgery

FT

Fast track

POD

Postoperative day

NJEEN

Nasojejunal early enteral nutrition

POPF

Postoperative pancreatic fistula

OFA

Opioid-free anesthesia

Notes

Author’s contributions

Study concept and design: EG and LS; acquisition of data: EG; analysis and interpretation of data: EG, DB, and LS; drafting of the manuscript: EG, FR, DB, and LS; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: LT, AM, HB, BM, KB, LS, and MR; statistical analysis: DB; final revision and final approval for publication: LS

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Howard TJ, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145:634–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KFD, Scholten RJ, de Castro SMM, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in The Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–790CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, Wan Y, Hanson T, Rettammel R, Winslow ER, Cho CS, Weber SM (2011) Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2126–2135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP (2007) Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 204:356–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D’Angelica MI et al (2012) Contemporary experience with postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: results of 1,122 patients resected between 2006 and 2011. J Am Coll Surg 215:616–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S, Hay JM, Fourtanier G, Fingerhut A, Sastre B, Chipponi J, Fagniez PL, Radovanovic A, French Associations for Surgical Research (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Addeo P, Delpero JR, Paye F, Oussoultzoglou E, Fuchshuber PR, Sauvanet A, Sa Cunha A, le Treut YP, Adham M, Mabrut JY, Chiche L, Bachellier P, French Surgical Association (AFC) (2014) Pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma and its association with morbidity: a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association. HPB 16:46–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud JP, Sauvanet A, Dejong CHC, Pessaux P (2013) Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37:230–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PHP, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt M, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA, Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group, Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu S-J, Xiong X-Z, Lu J, Cheng Y, Lin YX, Zhou RX, Cheng NS (2015) Fast-track programs for liver surgery: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1640–1652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, di Carlo V (2008) Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico- duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 95:1387–1393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williamsson C, Karlsson N, Sturesson C, Lindell G, Andersson R, Tingstedt B (2015) Impact of a fast-track surgery programme for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 102:1133–1141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B (2007) Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004929Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolff BG, Pembeton JH, van Heerden JA et al (1989) Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 209:670–673 discussion 673-675 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rao W, Zhang X, Zhang J, Yan R, Hu Z, Wang Q (2011) The role of nasogastric tube in decompression after elective colon and rectum surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 26:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pessaux P, Regimbeau J-M, Dondéro F, Plasse M, Mantz J, Belghiti J (2007) Randomized clinical trial evaluating the need for routine nasogastric decompression after elective hepatic resection. Br J Surg 94:297–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carrère N, Seulin P, Julio CH, Bloom E, Gouzi JL, Pradère B (2007) Is nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression necessary after gastrectomy? A prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 31:122–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roland CL, Mansour JC, Schwarz RE (2012) Routine nasogastric decompression is unnecessary after pancreatic resections. Arch Surg 147:287–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kunstman JW, Klemen ND, Fonseca AL, Araya DL, Salem RR (2013) Nasogastric drainage may be unnecessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison of routine vs selective decompression. J Am Coll Surg 217:481–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lassen K, Coolsen MME, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schäfer M, Parks RW, Fearon KC, Lobo DN, Demartines N, Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Dejong CH, ERAS® Society, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl 31:817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pulvirenti A, Ramera M, Bassi C (2017) Modifications in the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vermeulen H, Storm-Versloot MN, Busch ORC, Ubbink DT (2006) Nasogastric intubation after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of recent literature. Arch Surg Chic Ill 141:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Warshaw AL, Torchiana DL (1985) Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 160:1–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Naritomi G, Tanaka M, Matsunaga H, Yokohata K, Ogawa Y, Chijiiwa K, Yamaguchi K (1996) Pancreatic head resection with and without preservation of the duodenum: different postoperative gastric motility. Surgery 120:831–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eshuis WJ, Hermanides J, van Dalen JW, van Samkar G, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM, DeVries JH, Hoekstra JBL, Gouma DJ (2011) Early postoperative hyperglycemia is associated with postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 253:739–744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun Y, Li T, Wang N, Yun Y, Gan TJ (2012) Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1183–1194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hanna MM, Gadde R, Allen CJ, Meizoso JP, Sleeman D, Livingstone AS, Merchant N, Yakoub D (2016) Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 202:380–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hanna MM, Tamariz L, Gadde R, Allen C, Sleeman D, Livingstone A, Yakoub D (2016) Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy—does gastrointestinal reconstruction technique matter? Am J Surg 211:810–819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hüttner FJ, Klotz R, Ulrich A et al (2016) Antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD011862PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eshuis WJ, van Eijck CHJ, Gerhards MF, Coene PP, de Hingh IHJT, Karsten TM, Bonsing BA, Gerritsen JJGM, Bosscha K, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, Haverkamp JA, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM, Reitsma JB, Gouma DJ (2014) Antecolic versus retrocolic route of the gastroenteric anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 259:45–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hackert T, Probst P, Knebel P et al (2017) Pylorus resection does not reduce delayed gastric emptying after partial pancreatoduodenectomy: a blinded randomized controlled trial (PROPP Study, DRKS00004191). Ann Surg 267:1021–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Klaiber U, Probst P, Strobel O, Michalski CW, Dörr-Harim C, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Hackert T (2018) Meta-analysis of delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving versus pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 105:339–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beloeil H, Sulpice L (2016) Peri-operative pain and its consequences. J Visc Surg 153:S15–S18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bakan M, Umutoglu T, Topuz U, Uysal H, Bayram M, Kadioglu H, Salihoglu Z (2015) Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, dexmedetomidine and lidocaine infusions for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Rev Bras Anestesiol 65:191–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rayar M, Sulpice L, Meunier B, Boudjema K (2012) Enteral nutrition reduces delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy with child reconstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1004–1011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Perinel J, Mariette C, Dousset B, Sielezneff I, Gainant A, Mabrut JY, Bin-Dorel S, Bechwaty ME, Delaunay D, Bernard L, Sauvanet A, Pocard M, Buc E, Adham M (2016) Early enteral versus total parenteral nutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized multicenter controlled trial (Nutri-DPC). Ann Surg 264:731–737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elodie Gaignard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Damien Bergeat
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laetitia Courtin-Tanguy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michel Rayar
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Aude Merdrignac
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fabien Robin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karim Boudjema
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Helene Beloeil
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Bernard Meunier
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laurent Sulpice
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Université de Rennes 1RennesFrance
  2. 2.Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et DigestiveCHU RennesRennesFrance
  3. 3.CIC INSERM 1414RennesFrance
  4. 4.INSERM 1241, NUMECAN (Nutrition Metabolism and Cancer)RennesFrance

Personalised recommendations