German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease
- 890 Downloads
The present national guideline aims to provide recommendations for physicians involved in the treatment of patients with pilonidal disease. It has been published previously as an extended version in German language.
This is a systemic literature review. The present guideline was reviewed and accepted by an expert panel in a consensus conference.
Some of the present guideline conclusions were based on low- to moderate-quality trials. Therefore, an agreement was necessary in those cases to provide recommendations. However, recommendations regarding the most frequently used surgical procedures were based on numerous prospective randomized trials.
An asymptomatic pilonidal disease does not require treatment. A pilonidal abscess should be incised. After regression of the acute inflammation, a definitive treatment method should be applied. An excision is the standard treatment method for the chronic pilonidal disease. Open wound healing is associated with a low postoperative morbidity rate; however, it is complicated by a long healing time. The minimally invasive procedures (e.g., pit picking surgery) represent a potential treatment option for a limited chronic pilonidal disease. However, the recurrence rate is higher compared to open healing. Excision followed by a midline wound closure is associated with a considerable recurrence rate and increased incidence of wound complications and should therefore be abandoned. Off-midline procedures can be adopted as a primary treatment option in chronic pilonidal disease. At present, there is no evidence of any outcome differences between various off-midline procedures. The Limberg flap and the Karydakis flap are most thoroughly analyzed off-midline procedures.
KeywordsPilonidal sinus Pilonidal disease Pilonidal abscess Surgery
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Therefore, no informed consent had to be obtained prior to preparation of current manuscript.
- 1.Phillips, B, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, Dawes M (2009) Oxford Centre for Evidence-based medicine—levels of evidence. www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
- 2.Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S, GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ommer A, Berg E, Breitkopf C, Bussen D, Doll D, Fürst A, Herold A, Hetzer F, Jacobi TH, Krammer H, Lenhard BH, Osterholzer G, Petersen S, Ruppert R, Schwandner O, Sailer M, Schiedeck THK, Schmidt-Lauber M, Stoll M, Strittmatter B, Iesalnieks I (2014) S3-Leitlinie: sinus pilonidalis. Coloproctology 36:272–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2011) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev :CD006213Google Scholar
- 65.Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R (2005) Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up. Int J Color Dis 20:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 70.Denkers D, Girona J (1996) Der abszedierte sinus pilonidalis der Steißbeinregion—Möglichkeiten der chirurgischen Versorgung. Coloproctology 18:257–259Google Scholar
- 79.Akca T, Colak T, Ustunsoy B, Kanik A, Aydin S (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing primary closure with the Limberg flap in the treatment of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 92:1081–1084Google Scholar
- 113.Schmittner MD, Dieterich S, Gebhardt V, Weiss C, Burmeister MA, Bussen DG, Viergutz T (2013) Randomised clinical trial of pilonidal sinus operations performed in the prone position under spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % versus total intravenous anaesthesia. Int J Color Dis 28:873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar