Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 400, Issue 7, pp 791–796 | Cite as

Impact of anal decompression on anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

  • Soo Young Lee
  • Chang Hyun Kim
  • Young Jin Kim
  • Hyeong Rok KimEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The effectiveness of a transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage (AL) is still uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of anal decompression on AL after rectal cancer surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 536 rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection without diverting stoma, with (n = 154) or without (n = 382) placing of a transanal drainage tube, between January 2005 and December 2014. Risk factors for AL were analyzed, and propensity score matching analysis was used to compensate for the differences in baseline characteristics.

Results

AL occurred in 50 (9.3 %) of the patients. Male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.097, p = 0.005), high ASA score (OR 3.505, p = 0.025), and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (OR 2.506, p = 0.018) were independent predictors of AL on multivariable analysis. After propensity score matching, transanal drainage tube tended to lessen rates of grade C AL with definite peritonitis (1.9 vs. 5.8 %, p = 0.077), although there was no difference in the incidence of AL in patients with or without transanal drainage tubes (5.8 vs. 9.1 %, p = 0.278).

Conclusions

Placement of a transanal drainage tube was not associated with a reduction in the total incidence of AL after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Keywords

Rectal cancer Anastomotic leakage Anal decompression Transanal drainage tube 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

The authors received no financial support for this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was exempted because this retrospective study was harmless to the patients and contained no personal data. It was approved by the institutional review board of our institution.

Authors’ contributions

H.R.K. was responsible for the study conception and design. S.Y.L. and C.H.K. contributed to the acquisition of data; S.Y.L., C.H.K., and Y.J.K. to the analysis and interpretation of data; and S.Y.L. and H.R.K. to the drafting of the manuscript. Y.J.K. and H.R.K. were responsible for the critical revision of manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim NK, Kim YW, Min BS, Lee KY, Sohn SK, Cho CH (2009) Operative safety and oncologic outcomes of anal sphincter-preserving surgery with mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: 931 consecutive patients treated at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 16:900–909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shirouzu K, Ogata Y, Araki Y (2004) Oncologic and functional results of total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve-preserving operation for advanced lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1442–1447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102:462–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SI, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 257:665–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Ramos Rodriguez JL, Granero-Castro P, Hervas D, Alvarez Rico MA, Brao MJ, Sanchez Gonzalez JM, Garcia-Granero E (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, Kinugasa Y, Ota M, Yamaue H, Shiozawa M, Horie H, Kuriu Y, Saito N (2015) Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:186–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJ (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baek SJ, Kim J, Kwak J, Kim SH (2013) Can trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling in lower anterior resection reduce the need for a temporary diverting ostomy? World J Gastroenterol 19:5309–5313PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maeda K, Nagahara H, Shibutani M, Ohtani H, Sakurai K, Toyokawa T, Muguruma K, Tanaka H, Amano R, Kimura K, Sugano K, Ikeya T, Iseki Y, Hirakawa K (2015) Efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc Published Online First: 12 February 2015. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4104-2Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim HJ, Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ (2014) Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery according to the use of fibrin glue: case-control study using propensity score matching method. Am J Surg 207:840–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sterk P, Schubert F, Gunter S, Klein P (2001) Anastomotic protection with a transanal tube after rectum resection and total mesorectal excision. Zentralbl Chir 126:601–604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiao L, Zhang WB, Jiang PC, Bu XF, Yan Q, Li H, Zhang YJ, Yu F (2011) Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study. World J Surg 35:1367–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao WT, Hu FL, Li YY, Li HJ, Luo WM, Sun F (2013) Use of a transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg 37:227–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cong ZJ, Fu CG, Wang HT, Liu LJ, Zhang W, Wang H (2009) Influencing factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer. World J Surg 33:1292–1297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nishigori H, Ito M, Nishizawa Y, Nishizawa Y, Kobayashi A, Sugito M, Saito N (2014) Effectiveness of a transanal tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 38:1843–1851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hidaka E, Ishida F, Mukai S, Nakahara K, Takayanagi D, Maeda C, Takehara Y, Tanaka J, Kudo SE (2015) Efficacy of transanal tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancers: a retrospective cohort study in a single institution. Surg Endosc 29:863–867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Buchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, Lygidakis NJ (2008) Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 55:1562–1567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morks AN, Havenga K, Ploeg RJ (2011) Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: a review. World J Gastroenterol 17:4461–4469PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shigeta K, Okabayashi K, Baba H, Hasegawa H, Tsuruta M, Yamafuji K, Kubochi K, Kitagawa Y (2015) A meta-analysis of the use of a transanal drainage tube to prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection by double-stapling technique for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc Published Online First: 20 June 2015. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4237-3Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B, Turrini O, Guiramand J, Francon D, Mokart D, Houvenaeghel G, Giovannini M, Delpero JR (2010) The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg 251:249–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soo Young Lee
    • 1
  • Chang Hyun Kim
    • 1
  • Young Jin Kim
    • 1
  • Hyeong Rok Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryChonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical SchoolHwasun-gun JeonnamKorea

Personalised recommendations