Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 400, Issue 6, pp 741–748 | Cite as

Hand-assisted hybrid laparoscopic–robotic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis

  • Luca Morelli
  • Simone Guadagni
  • Maria Donatella Mariniello
  • Niccolò Furbetta
  • Roberta Pisano
  • Cristiano D’Isidoro
  • Giovanni Caprili
  • Emanuele Marciano
  • Giulio Di Candio
  • Ugo Boggi
  • Franco Mosca
How-I-Do-It article

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies have reported minimally invasive total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). We herein report a novel hand-assisted hybrid laparoscopic–robotic technique for patients with FAP and UC.

Methods

Between February 2010 and March 2014, six patients underwent hand-assisted hybrid laparoscopic–robotic total proctocolectomy with IPAA. The abdominal colectomy was performed laparoscopically with hand assistance through a transverse suprapubic incision, also used to fashion the ileal pouch. The proctectomy was carried out with the da Vinci Surgical System. The IPAA was hand-sewn through a trans-anal approach. The procedure was complemented by a temporary diverting loop ileostomy.

Results

The mean hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) time was 154.6 (±12.8) min whereas the mean robotic time was 93.6 (±8.1) min. In all cases, a nerve-sparing proctectomy was performed, and no conversion to traditional laparotomy was required. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 13.2 (±7.4) days. No anastomotic leakage was observed. To date, no autonomic neurological disorders have been observed with a mean of 5.8 (±1.3) bowel movements per day.

Conclusions

The hand-assisted hybrid laparoscopic–robotic approach to total proctocolectomy with IPAA has not been previously described. Our report shows the feasibility of this hybrid approach, which surpasses most of the limitations of pure laparoscopic and robotic techniques. Further experience is necessary to refine the technique and fully assess its potential advantages.

Keywords

Robotic proctectomy Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis Inflammatory bowel disease Familial adenomatous polyposis 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank Fabrizio Michelassi, M.D. for his review of the manuscript and constructive criticisms.

Study supported by ARPA foundation, www.fondazionearpa.it

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design: Morelli, Guadagni, Pisano, Mariniello, Furbetta, D’isidoro, Caprili, Marciano, Boggi, Di Candio and Mosca. Acquisition of data: Morelli, Guadagni, Pisano, D’isidoro, Caprili, Furbetta, Marciano and Mariniello. Analysis and interpretation of data: Morelli, Boggi, Di Candio and Mosca. Drafting of the manuscript: Morelli, Guadagni and Mariniello. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Morelli, Boggi, Di Candio and Mosca,.

References

  1. 1.
    Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Schroeder TK (1995) Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 222:120–127PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Church JM, Oakley JR, Milsom JW, Lavery IC (1993) Similar functional results after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and mucosal ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg 165:322–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ, Davies M, Piotrowicz K, Barnes SA, Wolff B, Pemberton J (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243(5):667–670PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK, Hammerhofer KA, Goormastic M, Church JM, Fazio VW (2000) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):604–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li JC, Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Leung KL (2009) The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in a university colorectal unit. Surg Endosc 23(7):1603–1608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sari V, Nieboer TE, Vierhout ME, Stegeman DF, Kluivers KB (2010) The operation room as a hostile environment for surgeons: physical complaints during and after laparoscopy. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 19(2):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49:822–883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26:191–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J (2006) The international consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire: www.iciq.net. JUrol 175:1063–1066Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hashimoto H, Shiokawa H, Funahashi K, Saito N, Sawada T, Shirouzu K, Yamada K, Sugihara K, Watanabe T, Sugita A, Tsunoda A, Yamaguchi S, Teramoto T (2010) Development and validation of a modified fecal incontinence quality of life scale for Japanese patients after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. J Gastroenterol 45:928–935CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charron P, Campbell R, Dejesus S, Gallagher J, Williamson P, Ferrara A (2007) The gap in laparoscopic colorectal experience between colon and rectal and general surgery residency training programs. Dis Colon Rectum 50(12):2023–2031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pigazzi A, Garcia-Aguilar J (2010) Robotic colorectal surgery: for whom and for what? Dis Colon Rectum 53:969–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a rospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, Mishra N, Rubach E, Zemon H, Klein JD, Denoto G 3rd (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc 26:956–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(10):1521–1525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pedraza R, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Haas EM (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anatomosis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20(4):234–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McLemore EC, Cullen J, Horgan S, Talamini MA, Ramamoorthy S (2012) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic stage II restorative proctectomy for toxic ulcerative colitis. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 8:178–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller AT, Berian JR, Rubin M, Hurst RD, Fichera A, Umanskiy K (2012) Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique. J Gastrointest Surg 16:587–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nakajima K, Lee W, Cocilovo C, Foglia C, Sonoda T, Milson JW (2004) Laparoscopic total colectomy. Hand-assisted vs standard tecnique. Surg Endosc 18:582–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fajiardo A, Dharmarajan S, George V, Hunt S, Birnbaum EH, Flashman JW, Mutch MG (2010) Laparoscopic versus open 2-stage ileal-pouch: laparoscopic approach allows for faster restoration of intestinal continuity. J Am Coll Surg 211:377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nowobilski W, Folwarski M, Dobosz M (2011) Hybrid procedures of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for large bowel disorders. Przeglad Chirurgiczny 83(10):537–540Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peters WR (1992) Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with creation of ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: report of two cases. J Laparoendosc Surg 2(3):175–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kirat HT, Remzi FH (2010) Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg Dec 23(4):239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Ouaissi M, Taleb P, Alves A, Panis Y (2009) Total laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal astomosis: prospective series of 82 patients. Surg Endosc 23:166–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fichera A, Silvestri MT, Hurst RD, Rubin MA, Michelassi F (2009) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a comparative observational study on long-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):526–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goede AC, Reeves A, Dixon AR (2011) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a 10-year experience of an evolving technique. Colorectal Dis 13(10):1153–1157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dolejs S, Kennedy G, Heise CP (2011) Small bowel obstruction following restorative proctocolectomy: affected by a laparoscopic approach? J Surg Res 170(2):202–208PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duff SE, Sagar PM, Rao M, Macafee D, El-Khoury T (2012) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: safety and critical level of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 14(7):883–886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Choi WH, Ryuk JP (2012) Early postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. J Korean Surg Soc 83(5):288–297PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schiessling S, Leowardi C, Kienle P, Antolovic D, Knebel P, Bruckner T, Kadmon M, Seiler CM, Büchler MW, Diener MK, Ulrich A (2013) Laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure in patients undergoing elective restorative proctocolectomy (LapConPouch Trial)-a randomized controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398(6):807–816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bordeianou L, Hodin R (2009) Total proctocolectomy with ileoanal J-pouchreconstruction utilizing the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2314–2320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nasir Meshikhes AW (2010) Controversy of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 16(45):5662–5668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shinohara T, Uyama I, Kanaya S, Inaba K, Isogaki J, Horiguchi A, Miyakawa S (2009) Totally laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:733–737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Geraerts I, Van Poppel H, Devoogdt N, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Joniau S, Van Kampen M (2013) Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 112(7):936–943PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Morelli
    • 1
    • 3
  • Simone Guadagni
    • 1
  • Maria Donatella Mariniello
    • 1
  • Niccolò Furbetta
    • 1
  • Roberta Pisano
    • 1
  • Cristiano D’Isidoro
    • 1
  • Giovanni Caprili
    • 1
  • Emanuele Marciano
    • 1
  • Giulio Di Candio
    • 1
  • Ugo Boggi
    • 2
  • Franco Mosca
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.General Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology, Transplantation and New TechnologiesUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  2. 2.General and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New TechnologiesUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  3. 3.EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery)University of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations