Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 400, Issue 1, pp 107–112 | Cite as

Is clipping the preferable technique to perform sympathicotomy? A retrospective study and review of the literature

  • Gregor J. Kocher
  • Anas Taha
  • Markus Ahler
  • Ralph A. SchmidEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Thoracoscopic sympathetic surgery is nowadays a broadly accepted technique in the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis as well as facial blushing. The objective of this study was to compare the two currently most commonly used methods for thoracic sympathicotomy: transection (ETS) and clipping (ETC.).

Methods

This is a retrospective study on a total of 63 patients, who underwent rib-oriented sympathicotomy, either by transection (n = 36, 57 %) or by clipping (n = 27, 43 %). Moreover, the up-to-date international literature is reviewed concerning which level(s) of the sympathetic trunk should be addressed, depending on the patients underlying condition. Furthermore, the highly controversial topic of reversibility of sympathetic clipping is debated.

Results

Our results confirm that clipping is at least as effective as transection of the sympathetic chain in the treatment of hyperhidrosis and facial blushing. Furthermore, the analysis of all larger studies on unclipping in humans shows a surprisingly high reported reversal rate between 48 and 77 %.

Conclusions

Depending on the symptoms of the patient, different levels of the sympathetic chain should be addressed. When a higher rib level such as R2 is approached, which more likely will result in moderate to severe compensatory sweating, clipping should be preferred as it seems that this technique has indeed a potential for reversibility. As demonstrated, this method is at least as effective as an irreversible transection of the sympathetic chain.

Keywords

Thoracoscopy Sympathectomy Hyperhidrosis Facial blushing 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

Authors’ contributions

Kocher and Taha were responsible for the study conception and design and acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. Ahler was also responsible for the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. Kocher and Schmid were responsible for the drafting of the manuscript, and Schmid was also responsible for the study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Lin CC, Mo LR, Lee LS, Ng SM, Hwang MH (1998) Thoracoscopic T2 sympathetic block by clipping: a better and reversible operation for treatment of hyperhidrosis palmaris—experience with 326 patients. Eur J Surg 164:13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reisfeld R, Nguyen R, Pnini A (2002) Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: experience with both cauterization and clamping methods. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:255–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cerfolio RJ, De Campos JR, Bryant AS, Connery CP, Miller DL, DeCamp MM et al (2011) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons expert consensus for the surgical treatment of hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 91(5):1642–1648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kang CW, Choi SY, Moon SW, Cho DG, Kwon JB, Sim SB et al (2008) Short-term and intermediate-term results after unclipping: what happened to primary hyperhidrosis and truncal reflex sweating after unclipping in patients who underwent endoscopic thoracic sympathetic clamping? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(5):469–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Questionnaire “Quality of Life Disturbances Due to Palmar Hyperhidrosis”. Available at http://www.isss.net/recommendations.html. Accessed Jun 2013
  6. 6.
    Gossot D, Toledo L, Fritsch S, Célérier M (1997) Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for upper limb hyperhidrosis: looking for the right operation. Ann Thorac Surg 64:975–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin CC, Telaranta T (2001) Lin-Telaranta classification: the importance of different procedures for different indications in sympathetic surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 90:161–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Licht PB, Pilegaard HK (2004) Severity of compensatory sweating after thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 78:427–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller DL, Bryant AS, Force SD, Miller JI Jr (2009) Effect of sympathectomy level on the incidence of compensatory hyperhidrosis after sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138(3):581–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weksler B, Blaine G, Souza ZB, Gavina R (2009) Transection of more than one sympathetic chain ganglion for hyperhidrosis increases the severity of compensatory hyperhidrosis and decreases patient satisfaction. J Surg Res 156(1):110–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reisfeld R (2006) Sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: should we place the clips at T2-3 or T3-T4? Clin Auton Res 16:384–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weksler B, Luketich JD, Shende MR (2008) Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy: at what level should you perform surgery? Thorac Surg Clin 18(2):183–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chang YT, Li HP, Lee JY, Lin PJ, Lin CC, Kao EL et al (2007) Treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis: T(4) level compared with T(3) and T(2). Ann Surg 246(2):330–336PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang J, Tan JJ, Ye GL, Gu WQ, Wang J, Liu YG (2007) T3/T4 thoracic sympathictomy and compensatory sweating in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 120(18):1574–1577Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu YG, Yang J, Wang J, Liu J, Li JF, Jiang GC et al (2006) A comparison of T3 sympathectomy versus T4 sympathectomy in the treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 86(33):2318–2320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heidemann E, Licht PB (2013) A comparative study of thoracoscopic sympathicotomy versus local surgical treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 95(1):264–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Loscertales J, Congregado M, Jimenez-Merchan R, Gallardo G, Trivino A, Moreno S et al (2012) Sympathetic chain clipping for hyperhidrosis is not a reversible procedure. Surg Endosc 26(5):1258–1263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bayram A, Salci H, Peker S, Melek H, Gebitekin C. Can sympathetic nerve damage be reversed? 27th annual meeting of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, October 5–9 2013, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chou SH, Kao EL, Lin CC, Chang YT, Huang MF (2006) The importance of classification in sympathetic surgery and a proposal mechanism for compensatory hyperhidrosis: experience with 464 cases. Surg Endosc 20:1749–1753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sugimura H, Spratt EH, Compeau CG, Kattail D, Shargall Y (2009) Thoracoscopic sympathetic clipping for hyperhidrosis: long-term results and reversibility. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(6):1370–1376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reisfeld R. Sympathectomy reversal. Clamping vs nerve graft. 8th international symposium on sympathetic surgery (ISSS), March 25–27, 2009. New York, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregor J. Kocher
    • 1
  • Anas Taha
    • 1
  • Markus Ahler
    • 1
  • Ralph A. Schmid
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of General Thoracic SurgeryUniversity Hospital BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations