Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 398, Issue 6, pp 799–806 | Cite as

Surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis

  • Hein G. Gooszen
  • Marc G. H. Besselink
  • Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
  • Thomas L. Bollen
Review Article

Abstract

Background

Acute pancreatitis remains an unpredictable, potentially lethal disease with significant morbidity and mortality rates. New insights in the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis have changed management concepts. In the first phase, characterized by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome, organ failure, not related to infection but rather to severe inflammation, dominates the focus of treatment. In the second phase, secondary infectious complications largely determine the clinical outcome. As infection is associated with increased mortality in acute pancreatitis, numerous prophylactic strategies have been explored in the past two decades.

Purpose

This review describes the strategies that have been developed to lower the infection rate, in an attempt to lower mortality. Antibiotic prophylaxis has been the subject of many RCT’s without showing convincing evidence of their efficacy. Probiotics, although theoretically capable of lowering the rate of infection, also had no effect on infectious complications, and consequently, no effective strategy to lower the rate of infectious complications is currently available. In the second part of this review, new approaches for necrosectomy that have been designed by different centers around the world are discussed. All the interventional techniques have in common their aim to lower the invasive character, hypothesizing that lowering the surgical trauma will improve survival and lower complication rates. Recent advances include postponing intervention as a strategy to facilitate necrosectomy and improve prognosis and the “step-up approach” in case of infected necrosis. The step-up approach includes percutaneous catheter drainage as the first step, to be followed by necrosectomy, either through a minimally invasive approach or by open necrosectomy, as the next step.

Conclusions

All attempts to develop treatment strategies to lower the infection rate in acute pancreatitis have failed. Accumulating evidence is emerging to show that the combination of centralization, the use of catheter drainage as the first step of invasive treatment, and the development of minimally invasive techniques, improve the outlook for patients with infected necrosis. It is uncertain at this point in time as to which of the three effects is dominant in the improvement of prognosis.

Keywords

Necrotizing pancreatitis Surgical treatment New developments 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This manuscript and parts of the display items were based on the chapter “acute pancreatitis” as prepared by the authors for the 7th Edition of “Shackelford’s Surgery of the Alimentary Tract,” copyright Elsevier (2012).

Conflicts of Interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Fagenholz PJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Harris NS, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA (2007) Direct medical costs of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations in the United States. Pancreas 35(4):302–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR, Gangarosa LM, Ringel Y, Thiny MT et al (2006) The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Am J Gastroenterol 101(9):2128–2138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101(10):2379–2400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Besselink MG, Van Santvoort HC, Boermeester MA, Nieuwenhuijs VB, van Goor H, Dejong CH et al (2009) Timing and impact of infections in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 96(3):267–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petrov MS, Shanbhag S, Chakreborty M et al (2010) Organ failure and infection of pancreatic necrosis as determinants of mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 139:813–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology, Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (2005) UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 54 Suppl 3:iii1–iii9Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mao EQ, Tang YQ, Fei J, Qin S, Wu J, Li L et al (2009) Fluid therapy for severe acute pancreatitis in acute response stage. Chin Med J (Engl) 122(2):169–173Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Warndorf MG, Kurtzman JT, Bartel MJ, Cox M, Mackenzie T, Robinson S, Burchard PR, Gordon SR, Gardner TB (2011) Early fluid resuscitation reduces morbidity among patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:705–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH et al (2010) A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 362(16):1491–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eckerwall GE, Tingstedt BB, Bergenzaun PE, Andersson RG (2007) Immediate oral feeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis is safe and may accelerate recovery–a randomized clinical study. Clin Nutr 26(6):758–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petrov MS, Zagainov VE (2007) Influence of enteral versus parenteral nutrition on blood glucose control in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Clin Nutr 26(5):514–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petrov MS, Loveday BP, Pylypchuk RD, McIlroy K, Phillips AR, Windsor JA (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition formulations in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 96(11):1243–1252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Vries AC, Besselink MGH, Van der Kraats CIB, Buskens E, van Erpecum KJ, Gooszen HG (2005) Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute necrotising pancreatitis: methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in relation to outcome. Gut 54(Supplement VII):A38–A39Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wittau M, Mayer B, Scheele J, Henne-Bruns D, Dellinger EP, Isenmann R (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 46(3):261–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Besselink MGH, van Santvoort HC, Buskens E, Boermeester MA, van Goor H, Timmerman H, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Witteman BJ, Rosman C, Ploeg RJ, Brink M, Schaapherder AF, van Dejong CH, Wahab PJ, van Laarhoven CJHM, van der Harst E, van Eijck CHJ, Cuesta MA, Akkermans LMA, Gooszen HG (2008) Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 371(9613):651–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luiten EJ, Hop WC, Lange JF, Bruining HA (1995) Controlled clinical trial of selective decontamination for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 222(1):57–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petrov MS, Van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, van der Heijden GJ, van Erpecum KJ, Gooszen HG (2008) Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus conservative management in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Surg 247(2):250–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, De Vries AC, Boermeester MA, Fischer K, Bollen TL et al (2009) Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 250(1):68–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mier J, Luque-de León E, Castillo A, Robledo F, Blanco R (1997) Early versus late necrosectomy in severe pancreatitis. Am J Surg 173(2):71–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cheatham ML, Malbrain ML, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Parr M, De Waele J et al (2007) Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome II. Recommendations. Intensive Care Med 33(6):951–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zerem E, Imamovic G, Omerovic S, Imsirovic B (2009) Randomized controlled trial on sterile fluid collections management in acute pancreatitis: should they be removed? Surg Endosc 23:2770–2777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Besselink MG, Van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL, Gooszen HG (2010) Draining sterile fluid collections in acute pancreatitis? Primum non nocere! Surg Endosc 25(1):331–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Baal MC, Van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Gooszen HG et al (2011) Systematic review of percutaneous catheter drainage as primary treatment for necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 98(1):18–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raraty MG, Halloran CM, Dodd S, Ghaneh P, Connor S, Evans J et al (2010) Minimal access retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy: improvement in morbidity and mortality with a less invasive approach. Ann Surg 251(5):787–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Horvath K, Freeny P, Escallon J, Heagerty P, Comstock B, Glickerman DJ et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected pancreatic collections: a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 study. Arch Surg 145(9):817–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Horvath KD, Kao LS, Wherry KL, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN (2010) A technique for laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess. Surg Endosc 15(10):1221–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Santvoort HC, Besselink MGH, Horvath KD, Sinanan M, Bollen TL, Ramshorst B et al (2007) Videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement in infected necrotizing pancreatitis. HPB 9(2):156–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Papachristou GI, Takahashi N, Chahal P, Sarr MG, Baron TH (2007) Peroral endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg 245(6):943–951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W, Jurgensen C, Will U, Gerlach R et al (2009) Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut 58(9):1260–1266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Voermans RP, Bruno MJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Fockens P (2007) Review article: translumenal endoscopic debridement of organized pancreatic necrosis—the first step towards natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26(Suppl 2):233–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S, Geskus RB, Besselink MG, Bollen TL et al (2012) Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 307(10):1053–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rau B, Bothe A, Beger HG (2005) Surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis by necrosectomy and closed lavage: changing patient characteristics and outcome in a 19-year, single-center series. Surgery 138(1):28–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rodriguez JR, Razo AO, Targarona J, Thayer SP, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL et al (2008) Debridement and closed packing for sterile or infected necrotizing pancreatitis: insights into indications and outcomes in 167 patients. Ann Surg 247(2):294–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Besselink MG, Verwer TJ, Schoenmaeckers EJ, Buskens E, Ridwan BU, Visser MR et al (2007) Timing of surgical intervention in pancreatitis. Arch Surg 142(12):1194–1201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group, van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL, Besselink MG, Ahmed Ali U, Schrijver AM et al (2011) A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology 141(4):1254–1263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nealon WH, Bawduniak J, Walser EM (2004) Appropriate timing of cholecystectomy in patients who present with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collections. Ann Surg 239(6):741–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hein G. Gooszen
    • 1
  • Marc G. H. Besselink
    • 2
  • Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
    • 3
  • Thomas L. Bollen
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Operating Rooms-Evidence based surgeryRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of RadiologySt. Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations