Promoter methylation status of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT genes in colorectal cancer associated with adenoma–carcinoma sequence
- 380 Downloads
Epigenetic silencing of the DNA mismatch repair genes has been poorly described in colorectal carcinomas showing the classic adenoma–carcinoma pathway of carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the methylation status of MutL homolog 1 (hMLH1), MutS homolog 2 (hMSH2), and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in a series of colorectal carcinomas that contain both adenomas and carcinomas.
Promoter methylation of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT was evaluated in normal mucosa, adenoma, and carcinoma samples from 112 colorectal cancer patients. Methylation was assessed by bisulfite modification and methylation-specific PCR. Expression of the gene products was also examined by immunohistochemistry.
Of the 112 adenomas, methylation was detected for hMLH1 (2, 1.8%), hMSH2 (9, 8.0%), and MGMT (38, 33.9%). In the carcinoma samples, methylation was seen in hMLH1 (2, 1.8%), hMSH2 (15, 13.4%), and MGMT (53, 47.3%). In normal mucosa, hMSH2 (6, 5.4%) and MGMT (12, 10.7%) were methylated, whereas hMLH1 was not. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed abnormal hMLH1 (14, 12.5%), hMSH2 (11, 9.8%), and MGMT (53, 47.3%) expression with a significant correlation between aberrant MGMT methylation and a loss of MGMT expression.
These data suggest that CpG island methylation in hMSH2 and MGMT, but not hMLH1, is closely related to carcinogenesis in colorectal carcinomas presenting with a conventional adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Therefore, the detection of hMSH2 and MGMT methylation may have clinical significance in the evaluation of colon cancer patients and in tumor-specific management of the disease.
KeywordsMethylation DNA mismatch repair hMLH hMSH2 MGMT Colorectal carcinoma
This study was sponsored by grants from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (0720570) and the Brain Korea 21 Project, Center for Biomedical Human Resources at Chonnam National University.
Conflicts of interest
- 4.Thiagalingam S, Lengauer C, Leach FS, Schutte M, Hahn SA, Overhauser J, Willson JK, Markowitz S, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1996) Evaluation of candidate tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 18 in colorectal cancers. Nat Genet 13(3):343–346. doi: 10.1038/ng0796-343 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Esteller M, Risques RA, Toyota M, Capella G, Moreno V, Peinado MA, Baylin SB, Herman JG (2001) Promoter hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase is associated with the presence of G:C to A:T transition mutations in p53 in human colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 61(12):4689–4692PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Shen L, Kondo Y, Rosner GL, Xiao L, Hernandez NS, Vilaythong J, Houlihan PS, Krouse RS, Prasad AR, Einspahr JG, Buckmeier J, Alberts DS, Hamilton SR, Issa JP (2005) MGMT promoter methylation and field defect in sporadic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(18):1330–1338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller CG, Morrow M (eds) (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.Shi SR, Cote RJ, Yang C, Chen C, Xu HJ, Benedict WF, Taylor CR (1996) Development of an optimal protocol for antigen retrieval: a 'test battery' approach exemplified with reference to the staining of retinoblastoma protein (pRB) in formalin-fixed paraffin sections. J Pathol 179(3):347–352. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199607)179:3<347::AID-PATH559>3.0.CO;2-L PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Herman JG, Umar A, Polyak K, Graff JR, Ahuja N, Issa JP, Markowitz S, Willson JK, Hamilton SR, Kinzler KW, Kane MF, Kolodner RD, Vogelstein B, Kunkel TA, Baylin SB (1998) Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(12):6870–6875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kim YH, Petko Z, Dzieciatkowski S, Lin L, Ghiassi M, Stain S, Chapman WC, Washington MK, Willis J, Markowitz SD, Grady WM (2006) CpG island methylation of genes accumulates during the adenoma progression step of the multistep pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 45(8):781–789. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20341 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Veigl ML, Kasturi L, Olechnowicz J, Ma AH, Lutterbaugh JD, Periyasamy S, Li GM, Drummond J, Modrich PL, Sedwick WD, Markowitz SD (1998) Biallelic inactivation of hMLH1 by epigenetic gene silencing, a novel mechanism causing human MSI cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(15):8698–8702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Goel A, Nagasaka T, Arnold CN, Inoue T, Hamilton C, Niedzwiecki D, Compton C, Mayer RJ, Goldberg R, Bertagnolli MM, Boland CR (2007) The CpG island methylator phenotype and chromosomal instability are inversely correlated in sporadic colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 132(1):127–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Jung SH, Kim HC, Kim JS, Choi J, Yu CS, Kim JC (2006) Efficacy of hMLH1/hMSH2 immunohistochemical staining as representative index for microsatellite instability status in sporadic colorectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 22(3):184–191Google Scholar
- 33.Park JW, Chang HJ, Park S, Kim BC, Kim DY, Baek JY, Kim SY, Oh JH, Choi HS, Park SC, Jeong SY (2010) Absence of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression as a stage-dependent prognostic factor in sporadic colorectal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 17(11):2839–2846. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1135-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Rigau V, Sebbagh N, Olschwang S, Paraf F, Mourra N, Parc Y, Flejou JF (2003) Microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinoma. The comparison of immunohistochemistry and molecular biology suggests a role for hMSH6 [correction of hMLH6] immunostaining. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127(6):694–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Overbeek LI, Ligtenberg MJ, Willems RW, Hermens RP, Blokx WA, Dubois SV, van der Linden H, Meijer JW, Mlynek-Kersjes ML, Hoogerbrugge N, Hebeda KM, van Krieken JH (2008) Interpretation of immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins is only reliable in a specialized setting. Am J Surg Pathol 32(8):1246–1251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Kim YH, Lee HC, Kim SY, Yeom YI, Ryu KJ, Min BH, Kim DH, Son HJ, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, Kim HC, Chun HK, Grady WM, Kim YS (2011) Epigenomic analysis of aberrantly methylated genes in colorectal cancer identifies genes commonly affected by epigenetic alterations. Ann Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1573-y Google Scholar