Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 395, Issue 8, pp 1025–1030 | Cite as

Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage

  • Stefanie Kudszus
  • Christian Roesel
  • Alexander Schachtrupp
  • Jörg J. Höer
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Up to 19% of all colorectal resections develop clinically apparent insufficiencies. Insufficient perfusion of the anastomosis is recognized as an important risk factor. As tissue perfusion can be objectified intraoperatively using laser fluorescence angiography (LFA), its effect on the rate of anastomotic complications was evaluated in a retrospective matched-pairs analysis.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2008, all anastomosis or resection margins in colorectal cancer resections were investigated intraoperatively using LFA (LFA group). Patients with colorectal cancer resections between 1998 and 2003 without LFA served as the control group. Four hundred two patients were matched for age, T-stage, type of resection and anastomosis, defunctioning stoma, administration of blood, emergency conditions, and body mass index. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher and the Wilcoxon tests.

Results

Twenty-two surgical revisions were necessary due to anastomotic leakage, seven (3.5%) in the LFA group and 15 (7.5%) in the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed that in elective resections the rate of revision was 3.1% (LFA group) and 7.7% (control group) (p = 0.04, risk of revision (ROR) reduced by 60%). In patients older than 70 years, the rate of revision was 4.3% (LFA group) compared to 11.9% (control group) (p = 0.04, ROR reduced by 64%). After hand-sewn anastomosis, the rate of revision was 1.2% (LFA group) and 8.5% (control group) (p = 0.03, ROR reduced by 84%). Hospital stay was significantly reduced in the LFA group (Wilcoxon test; p = 0.01).

Conclusion

There was an overall reduction in the absolute revision rate of 4% in the LFA group and a significantly reduced rate of revision in the subgroup analysis of patients undergoing elective colorectal resections, in patients older than 70 years and in patients with hand-sewn anastomosis. This demonstrates that LFA is a method that may significantly reduce not only the rate of severe complications in colorectal surgery but also the hospital length of stay.

Keywords

Anastomosis Colorectal surgery Complications Laser fluorescence angiography Indocyanine green 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication is dedicated to Prof. Christian Töns, our venerated teacher and surgical chief, coinventor of the IC-View® system, who died during his surgical work in November 2008. His untiring efforts to introduce the IC-View® system into clinical practice were sadly interrupted. It would have been his wish to see this study published.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Geldere D, Fa-Si-Oen P, Noach LA, Rietra PJ, Peterse JL, Boom RP (2002) Complications after colorectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation. J Am Coll Surg 194(1):40–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjödahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2):207–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49(11):1719–1725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wong NY, Eu KW (2005) A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 48(11):2076–2079CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grzebieniak Z, Szynglarewicz B (2006) Anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Przegl Lek 63(7):543–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, Baas PC, van Dam GM (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheridan WG, Lowndes RH, Young HL (1987) Tissue oxygen tension as a predictor of colonic anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 30(11):867–871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Höer J, Töns C, Schachtrupp A, Anurov M, Titkova S, Oettinger A, Wetter O, Schumpelick V (2002) Quantitative evaluation of abdominal wall perfusion after different types of laparotomy closure using laser- fluorescence videography. Hernia 6(1):11–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kologlu M, Yorganci K, Renda N, Sayek I (2000) Effect of local and remote ischemia–reperfusion injury on healing of colonic anastomoses. Surgery 128(1):99–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chung RS (1987) Blood flow of colonic anastomoses. Effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg 206:335–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Still J, Law E, Dawson J, Bracci S, Island T, Holtz J (1999) Evaluation of reconstructive flaps using laser-induced fluorescence of indocyanine green. Ann Plast Surg 42:266–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foster ME, Brennan SS, Morgan A, Leaper DJ (1985) Colonic ischaemia and anastomotic healing. Eur Surg Res 17(3):133–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asteria CR, Gagliardi G, Pucciarelli S, Romano G, Infantino A, La Torre F, Tonelli F, Martin F, Pulica C, Ripetti V, Diana G, Amicucci G, Carlini M, Sommariva A, Vinciguerra G, Poddie DB, Amato A, Bassi R, Galleano R, Veronese E, Mancini S, Pescio G, Occelli GL, Bracchitta S, Castagnola M, Pontillo T, Cimmino G, Prati U, Vincenti R (2008) Anastomotic leaks after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer: survey of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery. Tech Coloproctol 12(2):103–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, Kim DD, Park IJ, Kim HC, Kim JC (2008) Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51(6):902–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Testini M, Margari A, Amoruso M, Lissidini G, Bonomo GM (2000) The dehiscence of colorectal anastomoses: the risk factors. Ann Ital Chir 71(4):433–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD (2009) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction. Surg Today 39(3):183–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jǿrgensen T, Harling H (2010) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis 12:37–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR, Merrie AE (2006) Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at higher risk. ANZ J Surg 76(7):579–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gonçalves CG, Groth AK, Ferreira M, Matias JE, Coelho JC, Campos AC (2009) Influence of preoperative feeding on the healing of colonic anastomoses in malnourished rats. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 33(1):83–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Komen N, Dijk JW, Lalmahomed Z, Klop K, Hop W, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H, Ruud Schouten W, Lange JF (2009) After-hours colorectal surgery: a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(7):789–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biondo S, Pares D, Kreisler E, Rague JM, Fraccalvieri D, Ruiz AG, Jaurrieta E (2005) Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left- sided colonic emergencies. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2272–2280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rodriguez-Ramirez SE, Uribe A, Ruiz-Garcia EB, Labastida S, Luna-Perez P (2006) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer. Rev Invest Clin 58(3):204–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Willis S, Krones HF, CJ TA, Schumpelick V (2006) Evaluation of anastomotic microcirculation after low anterior rectal resection: an experimental study with different reconstruction forms in dogs. Tech Coloproctol 10:222–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cui Y, Chen H (2003) The effect of tension on esophagogastric anastomotic wound healing in rats. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 44(6):775–778Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, Radaelli G, Malvezzi L, Di Carlo V (2000) Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):76–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shikata J, Shida T (1986) Effects of tension on local blood flow in experimental intestinal anastomoses. J Surg Res 40(2):105–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilker D, Sklarek J, Waldner H, Izbicki JR, Siebeck M (1988) Early phase of healing of anastomoses with special reference to peritonitis and ischemia. Langenbecks Arch Chir 373(4):217–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Attard JA, Raval MJ, Martin GR, Kolb J, Afrouzian M, Buie WD, Sigalet DL (2005) The effects of systemic hypoxia on colon anastomotic healing: an animal model. Dis Colon Rectum 48(7):1460–1470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Toens C, Krones CJ, Blum U, Fernandez V, Grommes J, Hoelz F, Stumpf M, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2006) Validation of IC-VIEW fluorescence videography in a rabbit model of mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:332–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parsons HM (1974) What happened at Hawthorne? New evidence suggests the Hawthorne effect resulted from operant reinforcement contingencies. Science 183:922–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefanie Kudszus
    • 1
  • Christian Roesel
    • 2
  • Alexander Schachtrupp
    • 3
  • Jörg J. Höer
    • 4
  1. 1.Kaiserswerther Diakonie DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Marien Hospital DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  3. 3.Chirurgische Universitätsklinik AachenAachenGermany
  4. 4.Chirurgische Klinik I, Hochtaunuskliniken Bad HomburgBad HomburgGermany

Personalised recommendations