Extended preoperative patient education using a multimedia DVD—impact on patients receiving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial

  • D. Wilhelm
  • S. Gillen
  • H. Wirnhier
  • M. Kranzfelder
  • A. Schneider
  • A. Schmidt
  • H. Friess
  • H. Feussner
Controlled Prospective Clinical Trials

Abstract

Purpose

The informed consent is a legal requirement prior to surgery and should be based on an extensive preoperative interview. Multimedia productions can therefore be utilised as supporting tool. In a prospective randomised trial, we evaluated the impact of an extended education on patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Materials and methods

For extended patient information, a professionally built DVD was used. After randomisation to either the DVD or the control group, patients were informed with or without additional presentation of the DVD. The quality of education was evaluated using a purpose-built questionnaire.

Results

One hundred fourteen patients were included in the DVD and 98 in the control group. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly despite a higher educational level in the DVD group. The score of correctly answered questions was higher in the DVD group (19.88 vs. 17.58 points, p < 0.001). As subgroup analysis revealed, particular patient characteristics additionally impacted on results.

Conclusion

Patients should be informed the most extensively prior to any surgical procedure. Multimedia productions therefore offer a suitable instrument. In the presented study, we could prove the positive impact of an information DVD on patients knowledge. Nevertheless, multimedia tools cannot replace personal interaction and should only be used to support daily work.

Keywords

Informed consent Surgery Multimedia DVD Education 

References

  1. 1.
    Etchells E (1999) Informed consent in surgical trials. World J Surg 23(12):1215–1219. doi: 10.1007/s002689900650 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kayser MC, von Harder Y, Friemert B, Scherer MA (2006) On informed patient consent. Chirurg 77(2):139–149. doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1101-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edwards MH (1990) Satisfying patients’ needs for surgical information. Br J Surg 77(4):463–465. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770431 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Askew G, Pearson KW, Cryer D (1990) Informed consent: can we educate patients? J R Coll Surg Edinb 35(5):308–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan Y, Irish JC, Wood SJ et al (2002) Patient education and informed consent in head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(11):1269–1274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lavelle-Jones C, Byrne DJ, Rice P, Cuschieri A (1993) Factors affecting quality of informed consent. BMJ 306(6882):885–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hekkenberg RJ, Irish JC, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ (1997) Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember? J Otolaryngol 26(3):155–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klima S, Hein W, Hube A, Hube R (2005) Multimedia preoperative patient information. Chirurg 76(4):398–403. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0917-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luck A, Pearson S, Maddern G, Hewett P (1999) Effects of video information on precolonoscopy anxiety and knowledge: a randomised trial. Lancet 354(9195):2032–2035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10495-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hermann M (2002) 3-dimensional computer animation—a new medium for supporting patient education before surgery. Acceptance and assessment of patients based on a prospective randomized study—picture versus text. Chirurg 73(5):500–507. doi: 10.1007/s00104-001-0416-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Done ML, Lee A (1998) The use of a video to convey preanesthetic information to patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 87(3):531–536. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen HH, Yeh ML, Yang HJ (2005) Testing the impact of a multimedia video CD of patient-controlled analgesia on pain knowledge and pain relief in patients receiving surgery. Int J Med Inform 74(6):437–445. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.04.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yeh ML, Chen HH, Liu PH (2005) Effects of multimedia with printed nursing guide in education on self-efficacy and functional activity and hospitalization in patients with hip replacement. Patient Educ Couns 57(2):217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kessler TM, Nachbur BH, Kessler W (2005) Patients’ perception of preoperative information by interactive computer program-exemplified by cholecystectomy. Patient Educ Couns 59(2):135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.10.009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Danino AM, Chahraoui K, Frachebois L et al (2005) Effects of an informational CD-ROM on anxiety and knowledge before aesthetic surgery: a randomised trial. Br J Plast Surg 58(3):379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.10.020 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stergiopoulou A, Birbas K, Katostaras T, Diomidous M, Mantas J (2006) The effect of a multimedia health educational program on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Stud Health Technol Inform 124:920–925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stergiopoulou A, Birbas K, Katostaras T, Mantas J (2007) The effect of interactive multimedia on preoperative knowledge and postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Inf Med 46(4):406–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herrmann C, Brand-Driehorst S, Buss U, Ruger U (2000) Effects of anxiety and depression on 5-year mortality in 5,057 patients referred for exercise testing. J Psychosom Res 48(4–5):455–462. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00086-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Williams OA (1993) Patient knowledge of operative care. J R Soc Med 86(6):328–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fell D, Derbyshire DR, Maile CJ et al (1985) Measurement of plasma catecholamine concentrations. An assessment of anxiety. Br J Anaesth 57(8):770–774. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.8.770 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kulik JA, Mahler HI (1987) Effects of preoperative roommate assignment on preoperative anxiety and recovery from coronary-bypass surgery. Health Psychol 6(6):525–543. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.6.6.525 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ivarsson B, Larsson S, Luhrs C, Sjoberg T (2005) Extended written pre-operative information about possible complications at cardiac surgery—do the patients want to know? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28(3):407–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.05.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McEwen A, Moorthy C, Quantock C, Rose H, Kavanagh R (2007) The effect of videotaped preoperative information on parental anxiety during anesthesia induction for elective pediatric procedures. Paediatr Anaesth 17(6):534–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02173.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knobel A, Hassfeld S (2005) Preoperative information. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 9(2):109–115. doi: 10.1007/s10006-005-0593-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Wilhelm
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Gillen
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. Wirnhier
    • 2
  • M. Kranzfelder
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Schneider
    • 2
  • A. Schmidt
    • 3
  • H. Friess
    • 1
  • H. Feussner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Klinikum r.d.IsarTechnische UniversitätMunichGermany
  2. 2.Workgroup for Minimal Invasive Therapy and Intervention (MITI), Klinikum r.d. IsarTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  3. 3.Institute for media informaticsLudwig-Maximilian Universität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations