Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 391, Issue 2, pp 68–71 | Cite as

Video-assisted thyroidectomy: indications and results

  • Paolo Miccoli
  • Piero Berti
  • Gian Luca Frustaci
  • Carlo Enrico Ambrosini
  • Gabriele Materazzi
Current Concepts in Endocrine Surgery

Abstract

Background and aims

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) was set up and introduced in our department in 1998. Its results, after an acceptable relapse, can now be evaluated, also speculating on new possible indications.

Patients and methods

The procedure is based on a unique incision in the central neck, 2 cm above the sternal notch, using small conventional retractors and needlescopic (2 mm) reusable instruments. Haemostasis is achieved by a harmonic scalpel. Patients, 833, underwent MIVAT since June 1998. There were 715 females and 118 males (ratio 4:1). Lobectomy was carried out in 323 (38.7%) patients, total thyroidectomy in 510 (61.2%) patients.

Results

Mean operative time of lobectomy was 36.2 min (range: 20–120); for total thyroidectomy, 46.1 min (30–130). Conversion to standard cervicotomy was required in 16 cases (1.9%); Operative complications were represented by transient monolateral recurrent nerve palsy in eight cases (0.9%), definitive monolateral recurrent nerve palsy in seven cases (0.8%). Twenty patients exhibited a hypoparathyroidism, which corresponds to 3.9% of total thyroidectomies performed, but only two showed permanent hypoparathyroidism (0.3%).

Conclusion

MIVAT can be considered a safe operation offering significant cosmetic advantages with possible new promising indications such as prophylactic thyroidectomy in rearranged during transfection (RET) gene mutation carriers. It is still limited to a minority of patients, in particular, in endemic goitre countries.

Keywords

Endoscopic thyroidectomy Video-assisted thyroidectomy Minimally invasive thyroid surgery Papillary thyroid carcinoma RET gene mutation 

Supplementary material

(MPEG 36 mb)

References

  1. 1.
    Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Marcocci C (1999) Minimally invasive surgery for small thyroid nodules: preliminary report. J Endocrinol Invest 22:849–851PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gagner M, Inabnet WB (2001) Endoscopic thyroidectomy for solitary thyroid nodules. Thyroid 11:161–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shimizu K, Akira S, Jasmi AY, Kitamura Y, Kitagawa W, Akasu H, Tanaka S (1999) Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of thyroid tumors with a very minimal neck wound. J Am Coll Surg 188:697–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ohgami M, Ishii S, Ohmori T, Noga K, Furukawa T, Kitajima M (2000) Scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach better cosmesis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:1–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ikeda Y, Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Kan S, Niimi M (2000) Endoscopic neck surgery by the axillary approach. J Am Coll Surg 191:336–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G, Baldacci S, Rossi G (2001) Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 130:1039–1043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Bossola M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Alesina PF, Traini E (2002) Video-assisted vs conventional thyroid lobectomy: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 137(3):301–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Niimi M, Kan S (2002) Comparative studies of thyroidectomies: endoscopic surgery vs conventional open surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 16:1741–1745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duh QY (2003) Presidential address: minimally invasive endocrine surgery-standard of treatment or hype? Surgery 134(6):849–857CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miccoli P, Elisei R, Materazzi G, Capezzone M, Galleri D, Pacini F, Berti P, Pinchera A (2002) Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study about its completeness. Surgery 132:1070–1074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitigawa W, Shimizu K, Akasu H, Tanaka S (2003) Endoscopic neck surgery with lymph node dissection for papillary carcinoma of the thyroid using a totally gasless anterior neck skin lifting method. J Am Coll Surg 196:990–994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miccoli P, Materazzi G (2004) Minimally invasive, video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT). Surg Clin North Am 84(3):735–741, JunCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mourad M, Pugin F, Elias B, Malaise J, Coche E, Jamar F, Maiter D, Daumerie Ch, Squifflet JP (2002) Contributions of the video-assisted approach to thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Acta Chir Belg 102:323–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shimizu K, Kitagawa W, Akasu H, Hatori N, Hirai K, Tanaka S (2002) Video-assisted endoscopic thyroid and parathyroid surgery using a gasless method of anterior neck skin lifting: a review of 130 cases. Surg Today 32(10):862–868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Miccoli
    • 1
  • Piero Berti
    • 1
  • Gian Luca Frustaci
    • 1
  • Carlo Enrico Ambrosini
    • 1
  • Gabriele Materazzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di ChirurgiaUniversità di PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations