Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 390, Issue 4, pp 312–318 | Cite as

Patterns of neoplastic foci and lymph node micrometastasis within the mesorectum

  • Cun Wang
  • Zongguang Zhou
  • Zhao Wang
  • Yangchun Zheng
  • Gaoping Zhao
  • Yongyang Yu
  • Zhong Cheng
  • Daiyun Chen
  • Weiping Liu
Original Article


Background and aims

Local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery is conceived to result from microscopically incomplete resection. We aimed to investigate the patterns of mesorectal neoplastic foci, and examined the involvement and micrometastasis of lymph nodes.


Observation of large tissue slice and analysis of tissue microarray were integrated in the pathological study of 31 total mesorectal excision (TME) specimens.


Altogether, 349 mesorectal neoplastic foci were examined from 18 specimens. Almost 33% of them were in the outer layer of mesorectum. Concerning position of primary tumor, ipsilateral neoplastic foci were significantly more than contralateral neoplastic foci. Distal mesorectal spread was found in four patients with the distance ranging from 1 to 3.5 cm. Four specimens were diagnosed to have circumferential margin involved. Nine hundred seventy-two lymph nodes were harvested with 128 involved by tumor. No significant difference in occurrence of micrometastasis was observed among tumors of different stage.


Combination of large tissue slice and tissue microarray provided a more detailed method in studying the metastasis of rectal cancer. Complete excision of the mesorectum with fascia propria circumferentially intact is essential. Circumferential margin involvement and micrometastasis suggested that tumor spread may go beyond the scope of a single TME procedure.


Rectal cancer Mesorectum Micrometastasis 



This study was supported by The Key Project of National Outstanding Youth Foundation of China (grant number 39925032).


  1. 1.
    Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP (1984) Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer. I. The overall picture. Br J Surg 71:12–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1:1479–1482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D, Dixon MF, Quirke P (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344:707–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott N, Jackson P, al-Jaberi T, Dixon MF, Quirke P, Finan PJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision and local recurrence: a study of tumour spread in the mesorectum distal to rectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:1031–1033PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Haas-Kock DF, Baeten CG, Jager JJ, Langendijk JA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Arends JW (1996) Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:781–785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruch HP, Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Roblick UJ (1999) Actual standards and controversies on operative technique and lymph-node dissection in colorectal cancer. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 384:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goudet P, Roy P, Arveux I, Cougard P, Faivre J (1997) Population-based study of the treatment and prognosis of carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 84:1546–1550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hainsworth PJ, Egan MJ, Cunliffe WJ (1997) Evaluation of a policy of total mesorectal excision for rectal and rectosigmoid cancers. Br J Surg 84:652–656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Topor B, Acland R, Kolodko V, Galandiuk S (2003) Mesorectal lymph nodes: their location and distribution within the mesorectum. Dis Colon Rectum 46:779–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T, Okuno K (1997) Lymph node metastases detected in the mesorectum distal to carcinoma of the rectum by the clearing method: justification of total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg 184:584–588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T (1995) Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery. Cancer 76:388–392Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cawthorn SJ, Parums DV, Gibbs NM, A’Hern RP, Caffarey SM, Broughton CI, Marks CG (1990) Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet 335:1055–1059PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall NR, Finan PJ, al-Jaberi T, Tsang CS, Brown SR, Dixon MF, Quirke P (1998) Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent. Predictor of survival but not local recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 41:979–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, Norstein J, Eide TJ, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:327–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, Pathology Review Committee, Cooperative Clinical Investigators (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Abbott CR, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D, Quirke P (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 235:449–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scott KW, Grace RH (1989) Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg 76:1165–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, Tom P, Namiki TS (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2896–2900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldstein NS, Weldon S, Coffey M, Layfield LJ (1996) Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 106:209–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH, Dent O, Gathright B, Hardcastle JD, Hermanek P, Jass JR, Newland RC (1991) Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:325–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gusterson B (1992) Are micrometastases clinically relevant? Br J Hosp Med 47:247–248PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cun Wang
    • 1
  • Zongguang Zhou
    • 1
  • Zhao Wang
    • 1
  • Yangchun Zheng
    • 1
  • Gaoping Zhao
    • 1
  • Yongyang Yu
    • 1
  • Zhong Cheng
    • 1
  • Daiyun Chen
    • 2
  • Weiping Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Institute of Digestive Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Pathology, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations