Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 391, Issue 1, pp 1–3 | Cite as

Impact of modern technologies on quality of thyroid surgery

  • Henning Dralle
Editorial

There exists no uniform definition of “conventional” vs “modern” thyroid surgery, and moreover, there are only few studies analyzing the efficacy of and outcome after thyroid surgery comparing conventional technique with “modern” types of thyroidectomy. The introduction of new technologies in thyroid surgery during the last decade, such as intraoperative monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, minimally invasive surgery, preparation and resection with harmonic scalpel, vessel dissection without ligatures, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement, has led to several questions regarding the indication to and application of these methods: How to use? What about costs? What about patient selection and allocation? What about quality of surgery in terms of patient comfort and postoperative outcome? By applying new technologies, does the surgeon give up his key role as the most important factor of surgically related morbidity? Do new technologies such as intraoperative...

References

  1. 1.
    Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Bossola M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Alesina PF, Traini E (2002) Video-assisted vs. conventional thyroid lobectomy. Arch Surg 137:301–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Boscherini M, Alesina PF, Princi P (2002) Central neck lymph node removal during minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a feasible and safe procedure. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 12:181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dralle H, Sekulla C, Haerting J, Timmermann W, Neumann HJ, Kruse E, Grond S, Mühlig HP, Richter C, Voß J, Thomusch O, Lippert H, Gastinger I, Brauckhoff M, Gimm O (2004) Risk factors of paralysis and functional outcome after recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery. Surgery 136:1310–1322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dralle H, Sekulla C, Lorenz K, Grond S, Irmscher B (2004) Ambulante und kurzzeitstationäre Schilddrüsen-und Nebenschilddrüsenchirurgie. Chirurg 75:131–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Kan S, Niimi M (2002) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and lymphadenectomy for micropapillary carcinoma of the thyroid. J Surg Oncol 80:218–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kruse E (1981) Der Mechanismus der Taschenfaltenstimme. Eine kritische alternative Erwiderung auf die Vorstellungen Rethi’s. Folia phoniatr 41:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindblom P, Westerdahl J, Bergenfelz A (2002) Low parathyroid hormone levels after thyroid surgery: a feasible predictor of hypocalcemia. Surgery 131:515–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G, Baldacci S, Rossi G (2001) Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 130:1039–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miccoli P, Elisei R, Materazzi G, Capezzone M, Galleri D, Pacini F, Berti P, Pinchera A (2002) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study of its completeness. Surgery 132:1070–1074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Minuto M, Barellini L (2004) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: five years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 199:243–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Randolph GW (2003) Surgical anatomy of the recurrent layngeal nerve. In: Randolph GW (ed) Surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, pp 300–342Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takami H, Ikeda Y (2003) Total endoscopic thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg 26:82–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Testini M, Nacchiero M, Piccinni G, Portincasa P, Di Venere B, Lissidini G, Bonomo GM (2004) Total thyreoidectomy is improved by loupe magnification. Microsurgery 24:39–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomusch O, Machens A, Sekulla C, Ukkat J, Brauckhoff M, Dralle H (2003) The impact of the surgical technique on postoperative hypoparathyroidism in bilateral thyroid surgery: a multivariate analysis of 5846 consecutive patients. Surgery 133:180–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thomusch O, Sekulla C, Machens A, Neumann HJ, Timmermann W, Dralle H (2004) Validity of intra-operative neuromonitoring signals in thyroid surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:499–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Timmermann W, Hamelmann WH, Meyer TH, Timm S, Schramm C, Hoppe F, Thiede A (2002) Der Ramus externus des Nervus laryngeus superior (RELS): ein Stiefkind in der Chirurgie der Schilddrüse. Zentralbl Chir 127:425–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Voutilainen PE, Haglund CH (2000) Ultrasonically activated shears in thyroidectomies. Ann Surg 231:322–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walz MK, Lederbogen S, Limmer JC, Peitgen K, Mann K (2001) Die videoskopisch-assistierte Hemithyreoidektomie. Operative Technik und erste Ergebnisse. Chirurg 72:1054–1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamashita H, Murakami T, Noguchi S, Shiiba M, Watanabe S, Uchino S, Kawamoto H, Toda M, Murakami N (1999) Postoperative tetany in graves disease. Important role of vitamin D metabolites. Ann Surg 229:237–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General, Visceral and Vascular SurgeryMedical Faculty, University of HalleHalleGermany
  2. 2.Department of General, Visceral and Vascular SurgeryUniversity of HalleHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations