Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. However, the laparoscopic approach has remained controversial for patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) because of technical difficulties that, compared with open cholecystectomy (OC), might lead to higher complication rates, particularly common bile duct (CBD) injuries and infection.
We reviewed recent clinical findings on feasibility, safety and potential benefits of LC in patients with AC. An electronic search using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was performed using the terms laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy and acute cholecystitis. Pertinent references from articles and books not identified by the search engines were also retrieved. Relevant surgical textbooks were also reviewed.
The early laparoscopic approach has been shown to be technically feasible and at least equally as safe as the open approach. However, extensive inflammation, adhesions and consequent increased oozing can make laparoscopic dissection of Calot’s triangle and recognition of the biliary anatomy hazardous and difficult. Therefore, conversion to OC remains an important treatment option to secure patient safety in such difficult conditions. The question of whether intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) should be used routinely or only selectively has never been resolved. Proponents for each side have put forward compelling arguments.
KeywordsAcute cholecystitis Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Indication Technique Complications
- 1.Langenbuch C (1882) Ein Fall von Exstirpation der Gallenblase wegen chronischer Cholelithiasis: Heilung. Berlin Klin Wochenschr 19:725–726Google Scholar
- 2.Mühe C (1986) Cholecystectomie durch das Laparoskop. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir 369:804Google Scholar
- 8.National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (1993) Am J Surg 165:390–398Google Scholar
- 13.Miller RE, Kimmelstiel FM (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 7:296–299Google Scholar
- 14.Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RT, Toouli J (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg 218:630–634Google Scholar
- 21.Paul A, Millat B, Holthausen U, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S.). Surg Endosc 12:856–864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Jarvinen HJ, Hastbacka J (1980) Early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. A prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 1991:501–505Google Scholar
- 32.Schaefer D, Barth H, Thon K, Jostarndt L, Maroske D (1980) Early or delayed operation in patients with acute cholecystitis. Results of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Chir Forum Exp Klin Forsch 1980:149–153Google Scholar
- 35.Misra MC, Khanna S, Khosla A, Berry M, Kapur BM (1988) Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Jpn J Surg 4:384–389Google Scholar
- 37.Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467Google Scholar
- 49.Klaiber C, Metzger A (1995) Manual der laparoskopischen Chirurgie. Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
- 50.Krähenbühl L, Frei E (1996) Five years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a reappraisal. In: Büchler MW, Frei E, Klaiber C, Krähenbühl L (eds) Progress in surgery. Karger, Basel, pp 98–102Google Scholar
- 51.Singer JA, McKeen RV (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or gangrenous cholecystitis. Am Surg 60:326–328Google Scholar
- 54.Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL (1993) Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 217:233–236Google Scholar
- 60.Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (1997) Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc 11:1198–1201Google Scholar
- 66.Gigot J, Etienne J, Aerts R, Wibin E, Dallemagne B, Deweer F, Fortunati D, Legrand M, Vereecken L, Doumont J, Van Reepinghen P, Beguin C (1997) The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients. Surg Endosc 11:1171–1178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 67.Fountain AH, Gotten D, Evans D (1989) The utility of intraoperative cholangiography with acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 55:392–395Google Scholar
- 68.Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar