Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 389, Issue 4, pp 244–249 | Cite as

Effect of postoperative pain treatment on outcome—current status and future strategies

  • Henrik Kehlet
Current Concepts in Clinical Surgery

Abstract

Background and aims

The effect of postoperative pain relief on morbidity and hospital stay is reviewed.

Results

Beneficial effects of postoperative pain relief by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) opioids on morbidity and hospital stay have not been documented. The clinical outcome effects of the 20%–30% opioid sparing by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents have not been defined, but recent data suggest hastened recovery in cholecystectomy and knee surgery. The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on morbidity and hospital stay remains controversial except for improved pulmonary outcome. However, existing randomised trials on continuous epidural analgesia have insufficient design due to predominantly opioid-based epidural analgesia and the lack of a revision of perioperative care programmes to take advantage of the beneficial physiological effects of balanced epidural analgesia.

Conclusion

The effects of pain relief on outcome remains debatable, despite beneficial effects of pathophysiological responses. Future outcome studies are required where optimised dynamic pain relief is integrated with a multimodal rehabilitation programme.

Keywords

Postoperative pain Morbidity and hospital stay Epidural analgesia Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents Opioids 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant from the Danish Research Council (22-01-0160).

References

  1. 1.
    Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kehlet H, Dahl JB (2003) Anaesthesia, surgery and challenges for postoperative recovery. Lancet 362:1921–1928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walder B, Schafer M, Henzi I, Tramer MR (2001) Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled opioid analgesia for acute postoperative pain. A quantitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:795–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beattie WS, Badner NH, Choi P (2001) Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 93:853–858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S, Suarez T, Lau J, Chalmers TC, Angelillo IF, Mosteller F (1998) The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 86:598–612Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kehlet H, Holte K (2001) Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth 87:62–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holte K, Kehlet H (2003) Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcome—a research agenda. In: Tramèr MR (ed) Evidence-based resource in anaesthesia and analgesia, 2nd edn. BMJ Books, pp 175–183Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S (2000) Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 321:1493–1497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilmore DW (2002) From Cuthbertson to fast-track surgery: 70 years of progress in reducing stress in surgical patients. Ann Surg 236:643–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kehlet H (1998) Modification of responses to surgery by neural blockade: clinical implications. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PS (eds) Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp 129–175Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holte K, Kehlet H (2002) Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia – effects on surgical stress responses and implications for postoperative nutrition. Clin Nutr 21:199–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holte K, Kehlet H (2002) Perioperative single-dose glucocorticoids administration: pathophysiologic effects and clinical implications. J Am Coll Surg 195:694–748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S, Dahl JB (2002) Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Update Software, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kehlet H, Rung GW, Callesen T (1996) Postoperative opioid-analgesia: time for a reconsideration? J Clin Anesth 8:441–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Power I, Barrett S (1999) Analgesic agents for the postoperative period. Non-opioids. Surg Clin N Am 79:275–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buvanendran A, Kroin JS, Tuman KJ, Lubenow TR, Elmofty D, Moric M, Rosenberg AG (2003) Effects of perioperative administration of a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor on pain management and recovery of function after knee replacement. A randomised controlled trial. JAMA 290:2411–2418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gan TJ, Joshi GP, Viscusi E, Cheung RY, Dutsch W, Fort JD, Chen C (2004) Preoperative parenteral parecoxib and follow up oral valdecoxib reduces length of stay and improve quality of patient recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Anesth Analg (in press)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2003) Preoperative dexamethasone improves surgical outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 238:651–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sauerland S, Nagelschmidt M, Malmann P, Neugebauer EA (2000) Risks and benefits of preoperative high-dose methylprednisolone in surgical patients: a systematic review. Drug Saf 23:449–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henzi I, Walder B, Tramèr MR (2000) Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 90:186–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK (2001) Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Ann Surg 234:560–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Norris EJ, Beattie C, Perler BA, Martinez EA, Meinert CL, Anderson GF, Grass JA, Sakima NT, Gorman R, Achuff SC, Martin BK, Minken SL, Williams GM, Traystman RJ (2001) Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology 95:1054–1067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, Collins KS, MASTER Anaesthesia Trial Study Group. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:1276–1282Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peyton PJ, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Rigg JA, Jamrozik K, Parsons R (2003) Perioperative epidural analgesia and outcome after major abdominal surgery in high-risk patients. Anesth Analg 96:548–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    de Leon-Casasola OA (2003) When it comes to outcome, we need to define what a perioperative epidural technique is. Anesth Analg 96:315–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H (2002) Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth 89:622–632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ørding H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, the Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy (Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen P-E, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F) (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens. A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238:641–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K, Schricker T, Trudel J, Belliveau P (2002) Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology 97:540–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2000) Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 93:1123–1133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Macrae WA (2001) Chronic pain after surgery. Br J Anaesth 87:88–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgical Gastroenterology 435Hvidovre University HospitalHvidovreDenmark

Personalised recommendations