Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 389, Issue 2, pp 97–103 | Cite as

Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients

  • O. Schwandner
  • S. Farke
  • F. Fischer
  • C. Eckmann
  • T. H. K. Schiedeck
  • H.-P. Bruch
Original Article

Abstract

Background

It was the aim of this prospective study to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease.

Methods

All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular disease within a 10-year period were prospectively entered into a PC database registry. Indications for laparoscopic surgery were acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey stages I and IIa), chronically recurrent diverticulitis, sigmoid stenosis or outlet obstruction caused by chronic diverticulitis. Surgical procedures (sigmoid and anterior resection, left colectomy and resection rectopexy) included intracorporeal dissection and colorectal anastomosis. Parameters studied included age, gender, stage of disease, procedure, duration of surgery, intraoperative technical variables, transfusion requirements, conversion rate, total complication rate including major (requiring re-operation), minor (conservative treatment) and late-onset (post-discharge) complication rates, stay on ICU, hospitalisation, mortality, and recurrence. For objective evaluation, only laparoscopically completed procedures were analysed. Comparative outcome analysis was performed with respect to stage of disease and experience.

Results

A total of 396 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy. Conversion rate was 6.8% (n=27), so that laparoscopic completion rate was 93.2% (n=369). Most common reasons for conversion were directly related to the inflammatory process, abscess or fistulas. The most common procedure was sigmoid resection (n=279), followed by anterior resection (n=36) and left colectomy (n=29). Total complication rate was 18.4% (n=68). Major complication rate was 7.6% (n=28), whereas the most common complication requiring re-operation was haemorrhage in 3.3% (n=12). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 1.6% (n=6). Minor complications were noted in 10.7% (n=40), late-onset complications occurred in 2.7% (n=10). Mortality was 0.5% (n=2). Mean duration of surgery was 193 (range 75–400) min, return to normal diet was completed after 6.8 (range 3–19) days. Mean hospital stay was 11.8 (range 4–71) days. No recurrence of diverticulitis occurred.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is safe, feasible and effective. Therefore, laparoscopic colectomy has replaced open resection as standard surgery for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis at our institution.

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery Diverticulitis Sigmoid colectomy Conversion Complications 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. C. Killaitis for processing the prospective PC database registry and for statistical evaluation. The work was supported by a grant from Stiftung Coloplast, Hamburg, Germany.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1189–1194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruch HP, Schiedeck THK, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a five-year experience. Dig Surg 16:45–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O, Bruch HP (1998) Laparoscopic sigmoid resection in diverticulitis (in German). Chirurg 69:846–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner SD (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15:827–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Le Moine MC, Fabre JM, Vacher C, Navarro F, Picot MC, Domergue J (2003) Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Br J Surg 90:232–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Koehler L, Baerlehner E, Koeckerling F, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwandner O, Schiedeck THK, Bruch HP (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13:151–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Germer CT, Buhr HJ (2002) Sigmoid diverticulitis. Surgical indications and timing (in German). Chirurg 73:681–689Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koehler L, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E (1999) Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease: results of a consensus development conference. The Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 13:430–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makela J, Vuolio S, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (1998) Natural history of diverticular disease: when to operate? Dis Colon Rectum 41:1523–1528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poulin EC, Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA (2000) Should enteric fistulas from Crohn’s disease or diverticulitis be treated laparoscopically or by open surgery? A matched cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:621–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chautems RC, Ambrosetti P, Ludwig A, Mermillod B, Morel P, Soravia C (2002) Long-term follow-up after first acute episode of sigmoid diverticulitis: is surgery mandatory? A prospective study of 118 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:962–966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Makela J, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2002) Prevalence of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis is increasing. Dis Colon Rectum 45:955–961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (1998) Anastomosis level and specimen length in surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc 12:1149–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thaler K, Baig MK, Berho M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Arnaud JP, Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R (2003) Determinants of recurrence after sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:385–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berthou JC, Charbonneau P (1999) Elective laparoscopic management of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results in a series of 110 patients. Surg Endosc 13:457–460Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bouillot JL, Aouad K, Badawy A, Alamowitch B, Alexandre JH (1998) Elective laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for diverticular disease. A prospective study in 50 patients. Surg Endosc 12:1393–1396Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruce CJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Rusir LC (1996) Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 39 [Suppl]:S1–6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA, de Brauw LM, Sietses C (1997) Elective laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 11:750–753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Franklin MEJ, Dorman JP, Jacobs M, Plasencia G (1997) Is laparoscopic surgery applicable to complicated colonic diverticular disease? Surg Endosc 11:1021–1025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koeckerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Koehler L, Baerlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (1999) Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results of a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 13:567–571Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koehler L, Rixen D, Troidl H (1998) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:43–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sher ME, Agachan F, Bortul M, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 11:264–267Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sirisier F (1999) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for diverticular sigmoiditis. A single-surgeon prospective study of 65 patients. Surg Endosc 13:811–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smadja C, Sbai Idrissi M, Tahrat M, Vons C, Bobocescu E, Baillet P, Franco D (1999) Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 13:645–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stevenson ARL, Stitz R, Lumley J, Fielding G (1998) Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 227:335–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vargas HD, Ramirez RT, Hoffman GC, Hubbard GW, Gould RJ, Wohlgemuth SD, Ruffin WK, Hatter JE, Kolm P (2000) Defining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1726–1731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bergamaschi R, Tuech JJ, Cervi C, Arnaud JP (2000) Re-establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection? Randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 43:771–774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bergamaschi R, Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP (2000) Intracorporeal vs laparoscopic-assisted resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc 14:520–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bouillot JL, Berthou JC, Champault G, Meyer C, Arnaud JP, Samama G, Collet D, Bressler P, Gainant A, Delaitre B (2002) Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease. Results of a multicenter study in 179 patients. Surg Endosc 16:1320–1323Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10:15–18Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Menenakos E, Hahnloser D, Nassiopoulos K, Chanson C, Sinclair V, Petropoulos P (2003) Laparoscopic surgery for fistulas that complicate diverticular disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:189–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:503–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Dissanaike S, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Faynsod M, Stamos MJ, Arnell T, Borden C, Udani S, Vargas H (2000) A case–control study of laparoscopic vs open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg 66:841–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lawrence DM, Pasquale MD, Wasser TE (2003) Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg 69:499–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Trebuchet G, Lechaux D, Lecalve JL (2002) Laparoscopic left colon resection for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 16:18–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tuech JJ, Regenet N, Hennekinne S, Pessaux P, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2001) Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 15:1427–1430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2000) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1031–1033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Schwandner
    • 1
  • S. Farke
    • 1
  • F. Fischer
    • 1
  • C. Eckmann
    • 1
  • T. H. K. Schiedeck
    • 1
  • H.-P. Bruch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck CampusLuebeckGermany

Personalised recommendations