Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 389, Issue 1, pp 53–59 | Cite as

Hip joint contact forces during stumbling

  • G. Bergmann
  • F. Graichen
  • A. Rohlmann
Original Article



To determine whether load directions for stumbling are similar to those for common activities and whether stumbling can be realistically simulated under laboratory conditions without endangering the patients.


The magnitudes and directions of hip contact forces were measured during real and simulated stumbling and compared with those found during various other everyday activities. Measurements were obtained by use of hip implants with built-in load sensors and telemetry.


Peak forces are approximately twice as high during real stumbling as during any other activity and may range higher than eight-times the body weight. Simulated stumbling leads to much lower contact forces, especially if this happens after a warning. Accidental stumbling in everyday situations should, therefore, be avoided, especially in patients with hip replacements or arthrosis.


The directions of peak hip contact forces relative to the femoral bone are nearly constant for any activity, including real stumbling. This observation supports the assumption that muscle and bone anatomy plus muscle function are optimized in order to minimize stresses in bone and muscles. Any impairment of such a mechanically balanced system will increase the musculoskeletal loads. Malposition of total hip implants or muscle deficits caused by the surgical approach must, therefore, be avoided or minimized.


Hip Joint Force Implant Endprosthesis Stumbling Telemetry Load 



This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (BE 804-11).


  1. 1.
    Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1995) Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants? J Biomech 28:535–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heller M, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Claes L, Haas NP, Duda GN (2001) Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. Clin Biomech 16:644–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rydell NW (1966) Forces acting in the femoral head-prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 7 [Suppl 88]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davy DT, Kotzar GM, Brown RH, Heiple KGSR, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG Jr, Berilla J, Burstein AH (1988) Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 70-A:45–50Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergmann G, Graichen F, Siraky J, Jendrzynski H, Rohlmann A (1988) Multichannel strain gauge telemetry for orthopaedic implants. J Biomech 21:169–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graichen F, Bergmann G, Rohlmann A (1999) Hip endoprosthesis for in vivo measurement of joint force and temperature. J Biomech 32:1113–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graichen F, Bergmann G (1991) Four-channel telemetry system for in vivo measurement of hip joint forces. J Biomed Engineering 13:370–374Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1998) Loads acting at the hip joint. In: Sedel L, Cabanela ME (eds) Hip surgery—new materials and developments. Dunitz, London, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1993) Hip joint forces during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 26:969–990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1997) Hip joint forces during load carrying. Clin Orthop 335:190–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bergmann G, Kniggendorf H, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1995) Influence of shoes and heel strike on the loading of hip implants. J Biomech 28:817–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34:859–871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bergmann G (ed) (2001) HIP98—Loading of the hip joint. Free University of Berlin. Compact disc, ISBN 3980784800Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heller M, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Dürselen L, Pohl M, Claes L, Duda GN (2001) Musculo-skeletal loading conditions during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 34:883–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolff J (1892) Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Hirschwald, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomechanics LaboratoryCharité-University Medicine, BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations