Advertisement

Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 113, Issue 1–2, pp 149–159 | Cite as

An optimal control approach for blood pressure regulation during head-up tilt

  • Nakeya D. Williams
  • Jesper Mehlsen
  • Hien T. Tran
  • Mette S. OlufsenEmail author
Original Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents an optimal control approach to modeling effects of cardiovascular regulation during head-up tilt (HUT). Many patients who suffer from dizziness or light-headedness are administered a head-up tilt test to explore potential deficits within the autonomic control system, which maintains the cardiovascular system at homeostasis. This system is complex and difficult to study in vivo, and thus we propose to use mathematical modeling to achieve a better understanding of cardiovascular regulation during HUT. In particular, we show the feasibility of using optimal control theory to compute physiological control variables, vascular resistance and cardiac contractility, quantities that cannot be measured directly, but which are useful to assess the state of the cardiovascular system. A non-pulsatile lumped parameter model together with pseudo- and clinical data are utilized in the optimal control problem formulation. Results show that the optimal control approach can predict time-varying quantities regulated by the cardiovascular control system. Our results compare favorable to our previous study using a piecewise linear spline approach, less a priori knowledge is needed, and results were obtained at a significantly lower computational cost.

Keywords

Cardiovascular dynamics modeling Head-up tilt Non-pulsatile model Orthostatic intolerance Optimal control 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

Williams and Olufsen were supported in part by the virtual rat physiology project under grant NIH-NIGMS #1P50GM094503. Tran and Olufsen were supported by NSF under the grant NSF/DMS #1022688. Tran was also supported in part by NIAID under grant NIAID 9R01AI071915. Williams was also supported form the Department of Mathematical Sciences of the United States Military Academy at West Point. This research was performed while Williams held an NRC Research Associateship award at the Army Research Lab.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted.

Data

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Batzel JJ, Kappel F, Timischl-Teschl S (2005) A cardiovascular-respiratory control system model including state delay with application to congestive heart failure in humans. J Math Biol 50:293–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batzel JJ, Kappel F, Schneditz D, Tran HT (2007) Cardiovascular and respiratory systems: modeling, analysis, and control. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betts JT (1998) Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. J Guid Control Dyn 21:93–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton AC (1972) Physiology and biophysics of the circulation, 2nd edn. Year Book Medical Publishers, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. David JA (2007) Optimal control, estimation, and shape design: analysis and applications. PhD Dissertation, NC State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  6. De Pillis LG, Radunskaya A (2003) The dynamics of an optimally controlled tumor model: a case study. Math Comput Model 37:1221–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grodins FS (1959) Integrative cardiovascular physiology: a mathematical synthesis of cardiac and blood vessel hemodynamics. Q Rev Biol 34:93–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellwein LM (2008) Cardiovascular and respiratory modeling. PhD Thesis, NC State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  9. Engelsone A (2006) Direct transcription methods in optimal control: theory and practice. PhD Dissertation, NC State University, Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  10. Fink M, Batzel JJ, Kappel F (2004) An optimal control approach to modeling the cardiovascular-respiratory system: an application to orthostatic stress. Cardiovasc Eng 4:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lanier JB, Mote MB, Clay EC (2011) Evaluation and management of orthostatic hypotension. Am Fam Phys 84:527–536Google Scholar
  12. Levick JR (2010) An introduction to cardiovascular physiology, 5th edn. Hodder Arnold Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Matzuka B, Mehlsen J, Tran HT, Olufsen MS (2015) Using Kalman filtering to predict time-varying parameters in a model predicting baroreflex regulation during head-up tilt. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62:1992–2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller TH, Kruse JE (2005) Evaluation of syncope. Am Fam Phys 72:1492–1500Google Scholar
  15. Murray W, Gill PE, Saunders MA (2002) SNOPT: an SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J Optim 12:979–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mutsaers M, Bachar M, Batzel JJ, Kappel F, Volkwein S (2007) Receding horizon controller for the baroreceptor loop in a model for the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc Eng 206:14–22Google Scholar
  17. Nagaiah C, Kunisch K, Plank G (2013) Optimal control approach to termination of re-entry waves in cardiac electrophysiology. J Math Biol 67:359–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neilan RM, Lenhart S (2010) An Introduction to optimal control with an application in disease modeling. DIMACS Ser Discret Math Theor Comput Sci 75:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parklikar TA, Heldt T, Ranade GV, Verghese GC (2007) Model-based estimation of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance. Comput Cardiol 34:379–382Google Scholar
  20. Rao AV, Benson DA, Darby CL, Patterson MA, Francolin C, Sanders I, Huntington GT (2010) Algorithm 902: GPOPS, a MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using the gauss pseudo-spectral method. ASM Trans Math Softw 22:1–39Google Scholar
  21. Rao AV, Benson DA, Huntington GT (2011) User’s manual for GPOPS version 5.0 : a MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive pseuodpectral methods. http://www.gpops.org
  22. Robertson DW, Low PA, Polinsky RJ (2004) Primer on the autonomic nervous system, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. Kappel F, Fink M, Batzel JJ (2007) Aspects of control of the cardiovascular-respiratory system during orthostatic stress induced by lower body negative pressure. Math Biosci 206:273–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rowell LB (2004) Ideas about control of skeletal and cardiac muscle blood flow (1876–2003): cycles of revision and new vision. J Appl Physiol 97:384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saunders MA, Gill PE, Murray W, Wright MH (1986) User’s guide for NPSOL (version 4.0): a FORTRAN package for nonlinear programming. Tech Rep Dept Oper Res, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  26. Shoucri RM (1991) Pump function of the heart as an optimal control problem. J Biomed Eng 13:384–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith JJ, Kampine JP (1990) Circulatory physiology-the essential. The Williams & Wilkins Company, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  28. Stryk O, von and Burlirsch R (1992) Direct and indirect methods for trajectory optimization. Ann Oper Res 37:357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wesseling KH, Jansen JRC, Settels JJ, Screuder JJ (1993) Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear three-element model. J Appl Physiol 74:2566–2573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams ND, Tran HT,Olufsen MS (2013) Cardiovascular dynamics during head-up tilt assessed via a pulsatile and non-pulsatile model. Proc 3rd Int conf on simulation and modeling methodologies, technologies and applications, SciTePress, Sci Technol PubGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams ND, Wind-Willassen O, Mehlsen J, Ottesen JT, Olufsen MS (2014) REU-Program. Math Med Biol 31:365–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zaidi A, Benitez D, Gaydecki PA, Vohra A, Fitzpatrick AP (2000) Haemodynamic effects of increasing angle of head up tilt. Heart 83:181–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zarei H, Kamyad AV, Effati S (2010) Multiobjective optimal control of HIV dynamics. Math Prob Eng 568315:29.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/568315
  34. Zhang J, Critchley LAH, Lee DCW, Shaw KS, Lee SWY (2016) The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults. J Clin Monit Comput 30:519–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nakeya D. Williams
    • 1
  • Jesper Mehlsen
    • 2
  • Hien T. Tran
    • 3
  • Mette S. Olufsen
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.United States Military AcademyNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg HospitalFrederiksbergDenmark
  3. 3.NC State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations